Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: Government encourages more Singapore PRs to take up citizenship

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    532

    Default Government encourages more Singapore PRs to take up citizenship

    SINGAPORE: The Singapore Government is moving to encourage more Permanent Residents in the country to take up citizenship.

    Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said some PRs will be approached to become citizens and if they don't do so, their status will not be renewed.

    Immigration was one of many issues tackled during a dialogue session with over 200 residents from Marine Parade to gather feedback on the Prime Minister's National Day Rally.

    SM Goh did not give details on getting PRs to take up citizenship.

    "Moving forward, we are going to approach some of them to take up Singapore citizenship, if they don't then their PR will not be renewed. That's a better way.

    "We now have quite a few PRs, 500,000 in Singapore, so hopefully maybe 50,000 can be selected to become Singapore citizens, the rest can be PRs, contributing to Singapore's economy," he said.

    SM Goh was responding to a suggestion from a participant who said Employment Pass holders should take up citizenship which he believed will discourage foreign talents from working in Singapore.

    Besides, SM Goh pointed out that Employment Pass holders serve as buffers where their numbers can be reduced during a downturn.

    Another radical suggestion put forward was to bar foreigners from buying private property but SM Goh noted developers would just build more high-rise private apartments to counter it.

    "At the moment, our policy will be, condominium, private sector. They want to buy, let them buy because they actually bring in money for Singapore. They may not actually stay there but they bring in money.

    "They buy from locals, locals are happy to get the money but it's not actually adding to space. In fact, that's actually ideal. They buy here, they don't drive cars, they don't live here, we just get their money! They're buying air!" laughed SM Goh.

    Separately, SM Goh revealed it will cost S$1 billion to upgrade the train signalling system to increase capacity and reduce the waiting time for commuters.

    He said problems can be resolved rationally but noted that for every solution, there are consequences.

    Citing overcrowding in trains, SM Goh said the problem is expected and can be addressed.

    In this case, resources have to be put in place to upgrade the system.

    The cost may not be passed down to commuters directly, but SM Goh pointed out that it has to be defrayed.

    Similarly, there are consequences with measures introduced in the property sector.

    SM Goh acknowledged the situation has resulted in many unhappy Singaporeans, and he sought to put things in perspective.

    "Those who missed out, those who can't buy this, who can't upgrade and so on, so we are really feeling the unhappiness, question is was the policy good?

    "Unhappiness, those who are happier, in total there's net happiness, there's no such thing called total happiness, don't believe in it. It's whether we create net happiness in all this," said SM Goh.

    He added it is "very difficult to satisfy everybody" and in politics, trying to make everybody happy is "impossible".

    They key, said SM Goh is to "make the most number of people happy, the most number of times".

    Another idea worth considering in managing transport woes is to have a "zero vehicular traffic growth".

    "Let the COE take care of the number for cars on the road so when the number of cars cannot grow when the COE is so high then the roads will be freer so it's a combination of high COEs and low ERP.

    "But we have opted in the last 10 years or so to give Singaporeans the 4 wheels so we have opted for 3% growth in vehicle population and therefore use ERP to tweak it because one can argue that's fairer." he said.

    The question is to decide which is the best way forward, said the Senior Minister.

    He also answered questions on why the $9,000 award to recognise the contributions of NSmen is not extended to all who have served the country.

    SM Goh said authorities can consider giving older Singaporeans a token for their contributions.

    "I think the old days, the financial sacrifices were much more because you were paid just a nominal sum but there were other benefits. If you were born earlier, maybe you bought your HDB flat cheaper! So you cannot argue.

    "Your point is whether we can recognise in some way, token well I think we take note so that in future, they can remember the older ones, just a token, maybe past 55, help them with their medical top ups, I think that's possible. It's a suggestion we will take note."

    SM Goh was relaxed and candid in his answers. At several points, he threw questions back, seeking a consensus on issues.

    His message - that Singapore's problems can be resolved rationally, no matter how complex, with a good dose of the Singapore Spirit. - CNA/fa

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    532

    Default

    i think its politically incorrect to force citizenships on people.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    i think its politically incorrect to force citizenships on people.
    selective lah..

    the super rich pr, left alone

    the not so rich pr, ask to convert and soak up the hdb

    the middle ones, shift them to buy EC, after 5 years can sell EC and buy private. Their kids can buy HDB.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    i think its politically incorrect to force citizenships on people.

    i think is it is overall not right to offer hdb to people who are not committed to be citizen...

    garmen right move i like it, i would love it if they can only allow citizen to buy HDB, PR allow only to buy pte and rent...alternatively, limit their transaction on HDB and impose tax on HDB property sale if they are allow to buy HDB...

    this will keep hdb price in check and pte pty price up trend , rental uptrend, mass singaporeans who want to own hdb will be happy, pte pty owners will also be happy...when singpaoreans happy, pay and pay will be happy ad not worried about thier own friendly challenger from PP...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    532

    Default

    but aren't the people on the stree already not happy with immigrants taking up citizenship and competing with local born for public housing?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    i think the govt should give citizenship to PRs on a merit basis since we are a meritocratic society. We can start by only accepting graduate PRs with a degree or PRs without degrees by with net worth of at least US$1 million to become citizens. Our country is so small and yet we are opening doors to the whole world and govt is blaming speculators for runaway pty prices. If we really want to have PRs converted to citizens here, we need to be selective of the better ones and not any chapalang PRC who have their kids studying in a school here

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    but aren't the people on the stree already not happy with immigrants taking up citizenship and competing with local born for public housing?

    usng the analogy, my thought is the qty of the overall HDB flats is the same at this moment assuming...original number of HDB hunters is X+Y(where Y is singaporean) , now with X minus (not converted to citizen) = converted citizen(let call it Y1), if only ciztizens allow to buy, now the number will be Y1 + Y definitely will be << X+Y

    so more HDB choices..so those not covnerted to citizen are additional customers that are only allowed to buy private and rental...pte pty and rental up... swee swee, OMG (oh my God)pls implement it if you hear my prayer(read the forum here) ...it is for benefit of all singaporeans...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peterng8
    OMG (oh my God)pls implement it if you hear my prayer(read the forum here) ...it is for benefit of all singaporeans...
    Well I know our leaders are worshipped by some, but this ....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peterng8
    usng the analogy, my thought is the qty of the overall HDB flats is the same at this moment assuming...original number of HDB hunters is X+Y(where Y is singaporean) , now with X minus (not converted to citizen) = converted citizen(let call it Y1), if only ciztizens allow to buy, now the number will be Y1 + Y definitely will be << X+Y

    so more HDB choices..so those not covnerted to citizen are additional customers that are only allowed to buy private and rental...pte pty and rental up... swee swee, OMG (oh my God)pls implement it if you hear my prayer(read the forum here) ...it is for benefit of all singaporeans...

    Original situation

    1. Private = PR + SC + Foreign
    2. New HDB = SC or [SC + PR]
    3. Resale HDB = SC + PR

    New Situation

    1. Private = PR + SC + Foreign + New SC + New PR
    2. New HDB = SC or [SC + PR] + New SC + [New SC + PR] + [New SC + New PR]
    3. Resale HDB = SC + PR + New SC + New PR + [New SC + New SC] + [New SC + New PR] + [New PR + New PR]

    More population is better. New is better right?

    The impact will be

    1. PR and new PR = convert to new SC = more demand for HDB and EC
    2. New PR = more demand for EC and private
    3. PR buying HDB to PR buying private
    4. New SC buying New HDB.

    The concept of switching class and swapping segment.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver

    SM Goh did not give details on getting PRs to take up citizenship.

    "Moving forward, we are going to approach some of them to take up Singapore citizenship, if they don't then their PR will not be renewed. That's a better way.

    "We now have quite a few PRs, 500,000 in Singapore, so hopefully maybe 50,000 can be selected to become Singapore citizens, the rest can be PRs, contributing to Singapore's economy," he said.

    SM Goh was responding to a suggestion from a participant who said Employment Pass holders should take up citizenship which he believed will discourage foreign talents from working in Singapore.
    Well what is the thought behind this policy? Assuming only the "better" PRs will be offered citizenship, is the gov prepared to force out the "better" PR and keep only the lesser ones as a result of this "offer"?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by valkri
    Well what is the thought behind this policy? Assuming only the "better" PRs will be offered citizenship, is the gov prepared to force out the "better" PR and keep only the lesser ones as a result of this "offer"?
    I would think it is answered above.

    Just add water... more and more water will raise the boat higher and higher. No need rocket science.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cashrich
    Original situation

    1. Private = PR + SC + Foreign
    2. New HDB = SC or [SC + PR]
    3. Resale HDB = SC + PR

    New Situation

    1. Private = PR + SC + Foreign + New SC + New PR
    2. New HDB = SC or [SC + PR] + New SC + [New SC + PR] + [New SC + New PR]
    3. Resale HDB = SC + PR + New SC + New PR + [New SC + New SC] + [New SC + New PR] + [New PR + New PR]

    More population is better. New is better right?

    The impact will be

    1. PR and new PR = convert to new SC = more demand for HDB and EC
    2. New PR = more demand for EC and private
    3. PR buying HDB to PR buying private
    4. New SC buying New HDB.

    The concept of switching class and swapping segment.
    oh...in this way..the PR joins singapore for 5 years first and ask the choice to be converted to citizen(must support SM Goh ma), if they want can buy HDB, than if they dont want...continue to rent or continue to given a choice to buy pte pty lo..so lai that buay confuse ma... in the meantime, pte pty continue to be high, rental to be good...so bo bian LL must become citizen..so HDB price can be controlled to raise gradually and also buy time for more new HDB to be built...

  13. #13
    xebay11 is offline New Launch Project Specialist
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    What ever it is, I hope they invite (force) more Male PRs to become citizens, I believe we have too many female PR to citizen converts already.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Easy, get those doing ns now to convert after ns.

    Very easy to get them as they need to study thereafter and if they don't convert, have to pay PR school fee or lose their seats in school. If no need to study, take away their PR status as useless to Singapore.

    They will convert.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    88

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peterng8
    i think is it is overall not right to offer hdb to people who are not committed to be citizen...

    garmen right move i like it, i would love it if they can only allow citizen to buy HDB, PR allow only to buy pte and rent...alternatively, limit their transaction on HDB and impose tax on HDB property sale if they are allow to buy HDB...

    this will keep hdb price in check and pte pty price up trend , rental uptrend, mass singaporeans who want to own hdb will be happy, pte pty owners will also be happy...when singpaoreans happy, pay and pay will be happy ad not worried about thier own friendly challenger from PP...
    u sound like a loser under government policy...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jasonyap
    u sound like a loser under government policy...

    depend on how you look at it lo....but with the new ruling of property... very hard to find winner except FT(how to check if decalre no property overseas)when buy hdb.....he he

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    i think its politically incorrect to force citizenships on people.
    they shld be happy that they qualify to be citizens lol ~
    whether they decide to take up citizenship or not is still up to them, where got force?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by valkri
    Well what is the thought behind this policy? Assuming only the "better" PRs will be offered citizenship, is the gov prepared to force out the "better" PR and keep only the lesser ones as a result of this "offer"?
    i think there will be many incentives to support this...we can bet on this...garmen very smart one...maybe reduce those incentives under present PR policy and make them juicier to those who they will propose to be citizen...just wait and see...maybe HDB ownership is one of the incentives as mentioned, HDB unit is a sure profitable assest in this land scarce country...so small 5 million..and keep on increasing in near future if economy becomes better..

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,035

    Default

    left turn cannot

    right turn cannot

    how? go straight also cannot

    if like tat die lor...the car (Singapore) will not move...and remain stagnant

    grow up everyone and face the challenges..

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmonddd
    left turn cannot

    right turn cannot

    how? go straight also cannot

    if like tat die lor...the car (Singapore) will not move...and remain stagnant

    grow up everyone and face the challenges..

    he he alot of them already grown up...some of them old enough to become ah gong liao...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by august
    they shld be happy that they qualify to be citizens lol ~
    whether they decide to take up citizenship or not is still up to them, where got force?
    not all foreigners want to give up their own nationality.
    imagine angmoh earning a lot and paying local tax, if PR withdrawn because he/she refuse to give up his own nationality, then they revert to employment pass and no longer get local tax benefits....
    then all these foreign talent run to HK.... so Singapore lose out rite?
    left with blue collar PRs..

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,739

    Default

    it will be interesting if garmen allow dual citizenship.
    but this will be like moving back to square one?
    singaporean still lose out?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    "At the moment, our policy will be, condominium, private sector. They want to buy, let them buy because they actually bring in money for Singapore. They may not actually stay there but they bring in money.

    "They buy from locals, locals are happy to get the money but it's not actually adding to space. In fact, that's actually ideal. They buy here, they don't drive cars, they don't live here, we just get their money! They're buying air!" laughed SM Goh.
    PROPERTISM Rule No. 2 - Land is more valuable than air.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,739

    Default

    chances are they will sell back the air to local....

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Komo
    it will be interesting if garmen allow dual citizenship.
    oops...ur wish may come true.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    not all foreigners want to give up their own nationality.
    imagine angmoh earning a lot and paying local tax, if PR withdrawn because he/she refuse to give up his own nationality, then they revert to employment pass and no longer get local tax benefits....
    then all these foreign talent run to HK.... so Singapore lose out rite?
    left with blue collar PRs..
    i will be hesitant to use the word 'talent' so loosely
    the pap govt uses it to fulfill a political motive, in reality these 'talents' are just workers, no more no less

    in the long run Spore does not need and wont benefit from these fair weather types.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peterng8
    he he alot of them already grown up...some of them old enough to become ah gong liao...
    Ahh u r right. The message is targeted at those uncles aunties ah gongs and popos who hv been here many many years.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmonddd
    Ahh u r right. The message is targeted at those uncles aunties ah gongs and popos who hv been here many many years.
    hahaha

    we need more people at the national day parade swear in ?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl0ver
    not all foreigners want to give up their own nationality.
    imagine angmoh earning a lot and paying local tax, if PR withdrawn because he/she refuse to give up his own nationality, then they revert to employment pass and no longer get local tax benefits....
    then all these foreign talent run to HK.... so Singapore lose out rite?
    left with blue collar PRs..
    singapore wont lose out one...singapore opportunities and sweeteners to FT are too great to resist...alot of FT are trying to come in as worldwide job recovery is not fully restored...so this is right moment to implement whatever need to implement to FT...

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Komo
    it will be interesting if garmen allow dual citizenship.
    but this will be like moving back to square one?
    singaporean still lose out?

    dual citizenship..ha ha what an idea??IF I am FT, again for my own benefit, I will suggest this...enjoy both worlds(like got one legal wife(own country) and a mistress(host countyr, ie singapore), can enjoy both sides, song song, if singapore implement dual citizenship, a lot of singaporeans will show their disapproval during th big ticket day...

    dual citizenship will have far more impact and ramifications , singaporeans can give up already? why ? think about it...every privileges singaporeans have are now shared by FTs( who are dual citizenship), this is even worse than the current property rule now... the singaporean who think of this ougth to be ""saluted"" by rifle team...

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    -: 20-11-21, 11:28
  2. Replies: 0
    -: 07-09-21, 12:11
  3. SEX, ports and government contracts
    By reporter2 in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 5
    -: 08-10-13, 12:11
  4. Are Singaporeans rich? - Singapore household balance sheet - numbers from government
    By economist in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 47
    -: 25-07-13, 07:06
  5. S'porean PR urges court to let him renounce citizenship
    By land118 in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 17
    -: 05-12-11, 21:11

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •