I already say..don't get confused leh...y u still get confused all the time..its Thursday so...its no more Monday..
Please check my previous comments...
1) I never say the journalist report is wrong...how can that be so in Singapore reporting? I say the report gives a general statement that's all...and i say it is popular with home buyers....but not people like me who is an investor...please check my previous treads to confirm again if you are all mixed up by others' comments..
The report can also say Toyota is popular...but that does not tell u popular with who? If you have budget, you wouldnt want to buy toyota n=but preferred BMW or Merc right? If you have more budget, then Mersarati is a popular choice right? So, popular here does not mean much to me in this case unless it tell us it is popular with what type of buyers..
2) Second, there is a lot of the statements you made is totally wrong and i am here to correct as it is misleading to people...
Eg...You stated in your comments that Singapore is so small and that there is no such thing as prime district...this is the single most stupid statement i have ever heard from anyone who knows about property and i presume yoiu should be since you are writing in this forum..but this statement of yours is totally idiotic...and i replied that if that is the case, we should not be buying property at different prices..and Mr Mah Bow Tan should set all pries the same...totally laughable..
3) Your latest statement is also full of flaws that I felt that I need to correct you once again...
You say "
But yet, I still stress that not all D9, D10, D11 properties can command high price. District segregation is just a formality. What can sell high and what cannot depends largely on the location, project and the surrounding amenities."
The above is wrong....The most important attributes is the location which officially meant district....the rest is debatable and has much less impact on pricing...(District segregation is never a formality..it is a differientiator, don't come back and tell me district 22 is not difference to district 15...because I wont buy it....and many people don't and I am not sure about u)..Therefore, district 9,10, 11 is undisputed in terms of better location than 15...no argument about that...and so, in general, the prices there will always command a higher quantum than 15...you dont have to argue about this fact.....because it is a fact...don't tell me this project in district 15 is selling higher than that project in district 9,10 and 11....cos than, I will tell u another project will sell higher in district 9,10,11 than in district 15 and there is no end...
In general, projects in 9,10 and 11 sell higher than 15 and that is my statement and this cannot be disputed...full stop..
4) Your comment "A G2000 boutique located just beside a LV boutique does not mean G2000 can also sell LV prices." clearly shows your still lack of clear mind and good argument in this topic of property pricing..
The product you are talking is fashion goods....not about location my friend....here, fashion goods has no part to play in whether it is situated in a good location or bad...the product the boutiques are trying to sell is fashion good...LV being a premium fashion brand sell higher than G2000 which is mass market product...Don't get confused leh....
Please think properly before you respond in the future because it is very tiring trying to correct every mistakes you made...and theer are so many flaws in your statement and it gets me wonder why are you even trying to write something....