Originally Posted by
Bionic Leek
There is a fallacy in the arguments being put up above regarding condo age. I'm going to explain things in a fairly broad scenario - meaning we assume that the macro economic situation stays on low to moderate growth throughout the years.
Guys, you should try to understand what i wrote before flaming. Of course if you buy a property at the most recent peak of the cycle and you try to sell it at the base of the very next economic crisis you can't get the price. I don't even know why you bother quantifying that. Its a given. But over time you'll still make money. The only question to ask is, how much time?
I'm only saying that given a flat growth over time, (which is exactly the kind of chart Singapore's growth has been since the dawn of the country) property prices will definitely trend upwards.
However, each peak over time gets higher, and each trough gets higher too. So prices WILL trend up, and what I was sharing will happen.
For example, this recession is what many called the mother of all recessions, and its impact was global and felt keenly by the most powerful economies in the world. Yet, at the lowest (march/april 09), the property market prices generally dipped to 2006 levels. We didn't even see 2004 kinds of lows, not to mention 199X whatever troughs. And it lasted all of 3 months before prices are now somewhere between 2007 and 2008 levels again. Mass market has already overtaken 2007, prime is around 2008 levels.
So in general, the trend about price movements I was trying to explain to people who were asking about pre/post TOP pricing and the ensuing premiums holds true.
Cheers
Have you met my more successful sibling 'Super Potato'?