Page 6 of 30 FirstFirst ... 234567891011162126 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 894

Thread: The Sea View (D15, Freehold, Wheelock Properties)

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    263

    Default

    goodprice for that

  2. #152
    ocean Guest

    Default

    this is from ura's database as well, that's why u have all the full details... but such database are sold to property firms, not available to general public..

    the database should be accurate, barring typo errors by whoever that logged the info with the authorities...

    pulled out 2 entries on #14-15 for those interested to analyse ...

    Contract Date Project Name Property Type Tenure
    : : : :
    Postal (Old/New) Floor (Area/Rate) Land (Area/Rate) Price : : : :

    35, AMBER RD, 14-15 Record 273434
    1,410 $ 1,018,302.00 THE SEA VIEW / 29/05/2008 APT FH 1543 439945 131.00 S.F / $722 P.S.F S.M / P.S.M S.F / P.S.F S.M / P.S.M $7,773.30

    35, AMBER RD, 14-15 Record 269665
    1,410 $ 1,621,500.00 THE SEA VIEW / 20/03/2008 APT FH 1543 439945 131.00 S.F / $1,150 P.S.F S.M / P.S.M S.F / P.S.F S.M / P.S.M $12,377.86

    ========================== reformat

    Report Print on 12/06/2008
    Provider assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content of its website. You are using the website at your own risk. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required,
    the services of a competent professional person should be sought. The provider is not responsible for the results of any actions taken on the basis of information in this service, nor for any error in or
    omission from this service.
    SISV-REALink CaveatPlus
    Brief Report Format - Strata Title Property
    District Project Name Location Unit # Type Flr SqFt Flr $PSF Cont Date Transacted Tenure
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 14-15 APT 1,410 $722 29/05/2008 $1,018,302 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 29 AMBER RD 20-04 APT 1,647 $1,200 23/05/2008 $1,976,400 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 33 AMBER RD 16-12 APT 1,410 $1,280 21/05/2008 $1,804,800 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 14-09 APT 1,410 $1,277 09/05/2008 $1,800,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 16-09 APT 1,410 $1,277 06/05/2008 $1,800,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 37 AMBER RD 02-18 APT 1,410 $1,160 06/05/2008 $1,635,600 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 19-06 APT 1,216 $1,290 02/05/2008 $1,568,640 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 33 AMBER RD 02-13 APT 1,647 $1,032 29/04/2008 $1,700,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 20-09 APT 1,410 $1,250 29/04/2008 $1,762,500 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 16-16 APT 1,410 $1,200 28/04/2008 $1,692,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 29 AMBER RD 11-04 APT 1,647 $756 18/04/2008 $1,245,280 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 39 AMBER RD 03-24 APT 1,518 $1,173 09/04/2008 $1,780,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 14-16 APT 1,410 $1,149 08/04/2008 $1,620,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 29 AMBER RD 13-01 APT 1,647 $1,214 08/04/2008 $2,000,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 03-14 APT 1,647 $725 03/04/2008 $1,194,009 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 33 AMBER RD 15-11 APT 1,410 $801 28/03/2008 $1,128,902 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 16-06 APT 1,216 $1,270 24/03/2008 $1,544,320 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 14-15 APT 1,410 $1,150 20/03/2008 $1,621,500 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 14-07 APT 560 $1,281 19/03/2008 $716,800 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 12-06 APT 1,216 $1,250 18/03/2008 $1,520,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 37 AMBER RD 19-20 APT 560 $1,193 18/03/2008 $668,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 37 AMBER RD 03-21 APT 1,216 $1,200 03/03/2008 $1,459,200 FH
    District Project Name Location Unit # Type Flr SqFt Flr $PSF Cont Date Transacted Tenure
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 14-15 APT 1,410 $722 29/05/2008 $1,018,302 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 29 AMBER RD 20-04 APT 1,647 $1,200 23/05/2008 $1,976,400 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 33 AMBER RD 16-12 APT 1,410 $1,280 21/05/2008 $1,804,800 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 14-09 APT 1,410 $1,277 09/05/2008 $1,800,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 16-09 APT 1,410 $1,277 06/05/2008 $1,800,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 37 AMBER RD 02-18 APT 1,410 $1,160 06/05/2008 $1,635,600 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 19-06 APT 1,216 $1,290 02/05/2008 $1,568,640 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 33 AMBER RD 02-13 APT 1,647 $1,032 29/04/2008 $1,700,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 20-09 APT 1,410 $1,250 29/04/2008 $1,762,500 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 16-16 APT 1,410 $1,200 28/04/2008 $1,692,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 29 AMBER RD 11-04 APT 1,647 $756 18/04/2008 $1,245,280 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 39 AMBER RD 03-24 APT 1,518 $1,173 09/04/2008 $1,780,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 14-16 APT 1,410 $1,149 08/04/2008 $1,620,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 29 AMBER RD 13-01 APT 1,647 $1,214 08/04/2008 $2,000,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 03-14 APT 1,647 $725 03/04/2008 $1,194,009 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 33 AMBER RD 15-11 APT 1,410 $801 28/03/2008 $1,128,902 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 16-06 APT 1,216 $1,270 24/03/2008 $1,544,320 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 14-15 APT 1,410 $1,150 20/03/2008 $1,621,500 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 14-07 APT 560 $1,281 19/03/2008 $716,800 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 12-06 APT 1,216 $1,250 18/03/2008 $1,520,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 37 AMBER RD 19-20 APT 560 $1,193 18/03/2008 $668,000 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 37 AMBER RD 03-21 APT 1,216 $1,200 03/03/2008 $1,459,200 FH
    District Project Name Location Unit # Type Flr SqFt Flr $PSF Cont Date Transacted Tenure
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 31 AMBER RD 17-07 APT 560 $1,306 12/11/2007 $730,800 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 08-14 APT 1,647 $1,438 09/11/2007 $2,368,386 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 35 AMBER RD 08-14 APT 1,647 $1,438 09/11/2007 $2,368,386 FH
    D15 THE SEA VIEW 39 AMBER RD 10-26 APT 1,647 $743 07/11/2007 $1,223,836 FH
    Copyright (C) 2007 SISV Services Pte Ltd. All rights reserved, No reproduction in any form are allowed.
    Copyright (C) 2007 Singapore Land Authority. All rights reserved.
    Average PSF(S$)
    Average Floor Area
    Average Transacted(S$)
    1,143.00
    1,589,556.00

  3. #153
    Unregistered123 Guest

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by ocean
    pulled out 2 entries on #14-15 for those interested to analyse ...

    Contract Date Project Name Property Type Tenure
    : : : :
    Postal (Old/New) Floor (Area/Rate) Land (Area/Rate) Price : : : :

    35, AMBER RD, 14-15 Record 273434
    1,410 $ 1,018,302.00 THE SEA VIEW / 29/05/2008 APT FH 1543 439945 131.00 S.F / $722 P.S.F S.M / P.S.M S.F / P.S.F S.M / P.S.M $7,773.30

    35, AMBER RD, 14-15 Record 269665
    1,410 $ 1,621,500.00 THE SEA VIEW / 20/03/2008 APT FH 1543 439945 131.00 S.F / $1,150 P.S.F S.M / P.S.M S.F / P.S.F S.M / P.S.M $12,377.86
    Hi Mr Ocean, thanks a lot for the sharing!

    Look at this transaction, this owner has made more than half Million ($600K) profit for this #14-15 unit, and it faces rose garden with strong afternoon sun, what a lucky guy!

  4. #154
    Star Investor Guest

    Default

    Looking at the contract dates, it looks like a loss of $600K, haha. Maybe the previous owner striked TOTO or become bankrupt!

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    138

    Default

    That looks like a loss to me too, at 722 psf, why so low?

  6. #156
    ocean Guest

    Default

    for the uninitiated (to such data), i shared Unregistered123's interpretation that, despite the dates, $722 P.S.F was developer's sale and $1,150 P.S.F was the second transaction.. that's why different data on the same unit was pulled out for study instead of just relying on the latest (dated) info...

  7. #157
    Unregistered...... Guest

    Default The Esta Vs. The Seaview - cheap and good?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered888
    The first impression when I collected my Type E unit, was, rooms are too small. It is still small, nevetheless, we mount the beds over the baywindow, and build storage under the mattress, the bed room now look so much more spacious with more storage space.

    This is a wonderful project. I have seen many many new condo in the last two years, all bedrooms are about the same size unless the 4 bedrooms come more than 2000 sq ft like Sky@Eleven..
    Hi, the Esta thread re-actived now. Do you want to comment the Esta 4 bedder Type C2 vs. Seaview Type E, and the 3+1 Type B4 vs. Seaview Type C?
    http://www.mclland.com.sg/images/pro...ed_type_c2.jpg
    http://www.mclland.com.sg/images/pro...ed_type_b4.jpg

    Does Esta's rooms seem bigger than the Seaview, while the living hall not that small also?

  8. #158
    Sniper Guest

    Default

    If still can find $722 psf at the Seaview, I would not hestitate to give my downpayment chq to the seller. ;-)

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ocean
    for the uninitiated (to such data), i shared Unregistered123's interpretation that, despite the dates, $722 P.S.F was developer's sale and $1,150 P.S.F was the second transaction.. that's why different data on the same unit was pulled out for study instead of just relying on the latest (dated) info...
    Thanks for enlightening me

  10. #160
    Uregistered Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered......
    Hi, the Esta thread re-actived now. Do you want to comment the Esta 4 bedder Type C2 vs. Seaview Type E, and the 3+1 Type B4 vs. Seaview Type C?
    http://www.mclland.com.sg/images/pro...ed_type_c2.jpg
    http://www.mclland.com.sg/images/pro...ed_type_b4.jpg

    Does Esta's rooms seem bigger than the Seaview, while the living hall not that small also?
    The floorplans are not to scale.

    My interpretation of Esta floorplan is that the living dining area is cramped and the kitchen is very small, wasted foyer space at entrance in comparison to SeaView Type E which has a very spacious living dining and the kitchen is huge in comparison to new developments which have a "one way street" type of kitchen.

    Also note Bath 2 in Esta is without the WC but instead there is a powder room so one need to go in and out.....

    Type E in SeaView has 3 good size bathrooms and one tiny wc cum shower in the yard area.

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    263

    Default

    overall seaview look nice

  12. #162
    JR Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uregistered
    The floorplans are not to scale.

    My interpretation of Esta floorplan is that the living dining area is cramped and the kitchen is very small, wasted foyer space at entrance in comparison to SeaView Type E which has a very spacious living dining and the kitchen is huge in comparison to new developments which have a "one way street" type of kitchen.

    Also note Bath 2 in Esta is without the WC but instead there is a powder room so one need to go in and out.....

    Type E in SeaView has 3 good size bathrooms and one tiny wc cum shower in the yard area.
    "The floorplans are not to scale."

    Though the floorplan may not be to scale, the same goes for every other project including Seaview.

    "My interpretation of Esta floorplan is that the living dining area is cramped and the kitchen is very small, wasted foyer space at entrance in comparison to SeaView Type E which has a very spacious living dining and the kitchen is huge in comparison to new developments which have a "one way street" type of kitchen."

    On the contrary, i feel that the living & dining area of Esta would be more spacious than Seaview Type E, as less space is wasted on the huge balcony in Seaview. Kitchen is small for Esta? U kidding me? Esta kitchen has a full U shape whereas Seaview is a L shape. Not sure whether u cook but i personally prefer more space to put my ingredients during preparation.

    Abt the foyer, one plus pt is we can leave the door open n let air circulate so it is more windy and at the same time neightbours won't be able to see our family activities unless they step into the house.

    "Also note Bath 2 in Esta is without the WC but instead there is a powder room so one need to go in and out"

    In fact, i find it a plus point for Esta design. Unless one has a attached toilet, else Esta design is useful, so that 2 or more pple in the hse can do different activities at the same time, eg. Morning i shower while my brother passing motion at same time, np both in time to leave the hse for work.

    "Type E in SeaView has 3 good size bathrooms(with Rain-shower) and one tiny wc cum shower in the yard area."

    I am not sure whether u have been to the actual unit at the Seaview, but u mean showering at the tiny wc cum shower in the yard area? C'mon...

    Yes agree that Seaview has 3 bathrooms. I am not sure abt others but i personally spend less than 1 hr each day in the bathrm shower + poo poo, maybe even less. Asking me to pay above $1k psf for bathroom space using less than 1hr everyday?

    No offence to anyone this is just my personal opinion

  13. #163
    JR Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered......
    Hi, the Esta thread re-actived now. Do you want to comment the Esta 4 bedder Type C2 vs. Seaview Type E, and the 3+1 Type B4 vs. Seaview Type C?
    http://www.mclland.com.sg/images/pro...ed_type_c2.jpg
    http://www.mclland.com.sg/images/pro...ed_type_b4.jpg

    Does Esta's rooms seem bigger than the Seaview, while the living hall not that small also?
    For the 3 bedrm, i personally prefer Esta over Seaview both 1410sqft as:
    1) Esta has more "useful" space than Seaview. For Seaview a lot of space is wasted on the balcony. SV balcony easily 70+ sqft at $1300psf paying close to $100k for balcony?? whereas Esta balcony size is still ok and stretches from one end of dinning to the other end of living rm, like a natural extension of dining n living combined. It makes them seems even larger.

    2) Both projects has wasted space in the entrace, but personally i prefer the Esta's foyer has it act as a natural "shield" against neighbour that peer into your hse, while i can keep the door open to let air circulate to be more windy.

    3) Esta has an added study room with space saved from redundantly big balcony. Can be converted into guest room with a foldable bed. Not sure whether can heck the study rm wall down then have a giant master bedrm.

  14. #164
    Esta Better Fei Shui Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JR
    For the 3 bedrm, i personally prefer Esta over Seaview both 1410sqft as:
    1) Esta has more "useful" space than Seaview. For Seaview a lot of space is wasted on the balcony. SV balcony easily 70+ sqft at $1300psf paying close to $100k for balcony?? whereas Esta balcony size is still ok and stretches from one end of dinning to the other end of living rm, like a natural extension of dining n living combined. It makes them seems even larger.

    2) Both projects has wasted space in the entrace, but personally i prefer the Esta's foyer has it act as a natural "shield" against neighbour that peer into your hse, while i can keep the door open to let air circulate to be more windy.

    3) Esta has an added study room with space saved from redundantly big balcony. Can be converted into guest room with a foldable bed. Not sure whether can heck the study rm wall down then have a giant master bedrm.
    Esta has better fei shui as the entry foyer is a clever design. SW's case hard to retain $$$.

    See the below explainations:

    玄关在佛教中被称为入道之门。佛经云:“玄关大启,正眼流通。”而在住宅结构中,玄关则特指居所的外门,是进出房屋的必经之地,是亚洲传统建筑的重要组成部分。
    玄关是住宅内核最重要组成部分之一,可说是住宅的咽喉地带,它给予进入者的感觉相当与人与人之间的第一印象。据心理学分析,第一印象通常产生于前七秒,而这与进入住宅内部审视、玄关调整气息的时间基本相同。在西方,玄关就代表家庭的金钱运,对宅运吉凶具有决定性的影响。
    玄关是从大门进入客厅的缓冲区域,让运动的进入者静气敛神,同时是引气入屋必经之道,因此它的布置好坏可直接影响住宅的风水。

    从风水的角度来看,从大门入宅的旺气与财气应尽可能在屋内回旋,为住宅充分利用后,才慢慢流出屋外。

    ***倘若大门与阳台或窗户形成一直线,则从大门流入之旺气与财气便会迅速从阳台或窗口流走,旺气直入直出,是“泄水”之局,令家中的人及钱财均难一积聚。如果没有实墙,则在进门之处即可将阳台客厅一眼望穿,即形成俗称“前通后通,人才两空”的格局,对家居不利。***

    客厅是一家大小日常安坐聚首的所在,是家庭的活动中心,所以不能太暴露。如果客厅无遮掩,缺乏私密性,家中各人的一举一动均为外人在大门外一览无余,那便缺乏安全感,从风水角度来说亦非吉兆。
    而玄关即是大门与客厅的缓冲地带,基本上起到了遮掩的作用,令外人不能随便在大门外观察到屋内的活动,就可解决以上的问题。有玄关在旁护持,在客厅里会感受到安全性大增,同时也不怕私隐外露。

    Esta has foyer as a good 玄关, but SV does not have!

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,014

    Default

    This means SeaView is not good and not worth to buy ??? How is it doing now on the secondary market ? Anyone willing to sell and at what price /psf ?

  16. #166
    nregistered Guest

    Default

    its a case of sour grapes trying to run down the condo so they can buy it cheap..... but for everyone's info 99.99% of SeaView owners are not the kiasu type to sell at giveaway prices.

  17. #167
    Unregistered123 Guest

    Talking Fei Shui talk

    Those who follow Fei Shui still have not make it that why still look look see see. Can't even buy Esta yet.

    We already make it so No need to follow those Fei Shui Master talk. If they know better they already be Sea View owner than now talk about Fei Shui la.

    Sour Grapes : All SeaView Owner are having good profit now compare to Esta owner.

  18. #168
    Unregistered11 Guest

    Default

    You should visit the carpark at SeaView. Lots of expensive cars like Ferrari parked there. So FengShui there should be good since everyone is so rich to be able to afford luxury cars.

  19. #169
    Unregistered222 Guest

    Talking

    Jus txn a deal for 3 bedder 1313sqft at $855psf.

    If Esta is better than Sea View they will not having Fire Sales now for $ 855 psf !!!!

    Esta has better fei shui as the entry foyer is a clever design. SW's case hard to retain $$$. ----??????

    This Fei Shui Master can not make it la........He He He...

  20. #170
    Unregistered123 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered123
    Those who follow Fei Shui still have not make it that why still look look see see. Can't even buy Esta yet.

    We already make it so No need to follow those Fei Shui Master talk. If they know better they already be Sea View owner than now talk about Fei Shui la.

    Sour Grapes : All SeaView Owner are having good profit now compare to Esta owner.
    when you sell high high and got silly ppl buy in such sky high price, then you can declare you make profit, now just a paper value! you are kind of sour grapes, nobody want to buy your unit, dispirited by the huge housing loan, business no good, job no secure.... haha!

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    24

    Default

    The lowest prices register is 1028psf. There is nothing such as 7XX psf. So do bullshit. IDA may be going after you soon for misleading the public. This is a crime under the Information ACT.

  22. #172
    Unregistered123 Guest

    Talking You can't even offer min $ 1,300psf of course can't stay in Sea View lor....

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered123
    when you sell high high and got silly ppl buy in such sky high price, then you can declare you make profit, now just a paper value! you are kind of sour grapes, nobody want to buy your unit, dispirited by the huge housing loan, business no good, job no secure.... haha!
    So many potential buyer been giving offer for $ 1,300psf...But most of the Sea View owner is looking at min $ 1,400psf man. Not like Esta even $ 855psf still no taker...this is sour grapes ???? HA HA...

    You can't even offer min $ 1,300psf of course can't stay in Sea View lor....

  23. #173
    Unregistered? Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smartinvest
    The lowest prices register is 1028psf. There is nothing such as 7XX psf. So do bullshit. IDA may be going after you soon for misleading the public. This is a crime under the Information ACT.
    Halo! anybody mention 7XX psf? this is SV thread, my friend!

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Maron Please read earlier reply before anyhow post

    Originally Posted by ocean
    35, AMBER RD, 14-15
    Project Name : THE SEA VIEW Postal (Old/New) : 1543/439945
    Contract Date : 29/05/2008 Floor (Area/Rate) : 1410 S.F / $ 722 P.S.F
    Property Type : APT Land (Area/Rate) : S.F / P.S.F
    Tenure : FH Price : $ 1,018,302

  25. #175
    dakota sucks Guest

    Default

    New launch at St michael Rd from 600psf, 999yr leasehold. Dakoda buyers are screwed now!!!!!!!!!!!

  26. #176
    Uregistered Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smartinvest
    Maron Please read earlier reply before anyhow post

    Originally Posted by ocean
    35, AMBER RD, 14-15
    Project Name : THE SEA VIEW Postal (Old/New) : 1543/439945
    Contract Date : 29/05/2008 Floor (Area/Rate) : 1410 S.F / $ 722 P.S.F
    Property Type : APT Land (Area/Rate) : S.F / P.S.F
    Tenure : FH Price : $ 1,018,302

    This is a case of the owner taking possession of the unit upon TOP and
    its a delayed posting of the caveat. Most likely a defered payment case.

  27. #177
    Kovan Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dakota sucks
    New launch at St michael Rd from 600psf, 999yr leasehold. Dakoda buyers are screwed now!!!!!!!!!!!
    Haha.... look at the other thread, new launch at Kovan this weekend, 500+ units, 99-year, minimum $900psf, makes Dakota Residences a steal!

  28. #178
    UnregĄstered Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dakota sucks
    New launch at St michael Rd from 600psf, 999yr leasehold. Dakoda buyers are screwed now!!!!!!!!!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Kovan
    Haha.... look at the other thread, new launch at Kovan this weekend, 500+ units, 99-year, minimum $900psf, makes Dakota Residences a steal!
    2 idiots talking cock here!

    Wake up! This thread is not for St Michael nor Dakota.

  29. #179
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    62

    Default Wow... over 1k psf

    Quote Originally Posted by smartinvest
    The lowest prices register is 1028psf. There is nothing such as 7XX psf. So do bullshit. IDA may be going after you soon for misleading the public. This is a crime under the Information ACT.
    Just browsing the paper, I can see Anchorage across IKEA Alexander and near ABC market and Tiong Bahru for 1k psf without any negotiation. Why live so far from city when you can buy one 10 min from Orchard with potential for en bloc in future?

    But one bad thing is it's old and needs renovation... but I'm sure there are other places which are newer ard that area for ard that price if you want new...

    I think a more realistic/reasonable price would be 800psf for this area.

  30. #180
    UnregĄstered Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oxboy99
    Just browsing the paper, I can see Anchorage across IKEA Alexander and near ABC market and Tiong Bahru for 1k psf without any negotiation. Why live so far from city when you can buy one 10 min from Orchard with potential for en bloc in future?

    But one bad thing is it's old and needs renovation... but I'm sure there are other places which are newer ard that area for ard that price if you want new...

    I think a more realistic/reasonable price would be 800psf for this area.
    Siow lah!
    $800psf. You have brain damage or what?
    No fúcking guts!

    It's more like $80psf.
    Just say it. We will support you.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    -: 19-03-12, 14:20
  2. CEO of Wheelock Properties dies
    By reporter2 in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 1
    -: 11-03-12, 19:28
  3. Ardmore II (D10, Freehold, Wheelock Properties)
    By bananarama in forum District 10
    Replies: 40
    -: 08-03-11, 14:41
  4. Orchard View (D9, Freehold, Wheelock Properties)
    By meesiammaihum in forum District 9
    Replies: 25
    -: 18-02-10, 09:27
  5. Wheelock to launch Orchard View in Q1
    By mr funny in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 20-01-10, 11:02

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •