Hi, anyone interested in a 2+1 units: 1141 psf, blk 81, 2nd floor, facing the green? Call HP96333784.
Hi, anyone interested in a 2+1 units: 1141 psf, blk 81, 2nd floor, facing the green? Call HP96333784.
Forgot to mention: only 10 units of 2+1 in this project.
Since the owner paid only 450 sqf for it and all the 2+1 units were more or less transacted at that price, I doubt you can get valuation above 500 psf for the unit. Unless you can get valuation close to the selling price, the purchaser would need to come up additional cash to cover the differences which could be an issue for many prospective buyersOriginally Posted by Unregistered
According to a post on another thread, Hillview Regency is asking over $900psf!!!!
Wow! Makes RT look like a bargain....
I thought that is a 22nd story unit, Does RT has 22nd story unit available for sale?Originally Posted by Unregistered
Location is primary, height is secondary.Originally Posted by Unregistered
Let me just put it this way. The 5th storey of The LadyHill is a lot more expensive than the 5th storey of BLVD.
THE RAINTREE BUKIT DRIVE Condominium 118 1270 640,000 Apr-07
Latest transacted price. Likely a sub-sale 'cos developer prices are not so rounded. Push harder guys!
Unlikely to be sub-sales as most new buyers would have gotten from the developer last mth, lodging of caveat prob takes 1-2 mths. I got mine fm developer at discounted round price tooOriginally Posted by Unregistered
there's a posting sometime back whom mentioned that friend got a subsale rail facing unit for 640k, most prob is this one
An Ad in ST today for a 1270 sqf rail facing unit asking for $570 psf, saying that selling below developer unit.Originally Posted by Unregistered
The truth is the rail facing unit were 50-60 psf lower than the pool facing units from day one when the project was launched. I believe developer sold out the last rail facing unit near the end of March at 510 psf. I guess the owner is trying to compare his unit with the last 3+1 unit sold in raintree which is about 650psf
It will be very interesting to watch how much this unit can fetch at subsale market
To be on the accurate side, difference is not $50-60 psf but rather $68-84 psf.Originally Posted by Unregistered
Comparing Blks 87 and 89, pool facing(1335sf) versus rail track facing(1270) units on the same floor, during the developer launch:
The rail facing units were on average $75 psf lower than pool facing units. Average is taken from $70, 68, 81, 84 psf. Note comparison based on same block and same floor, difference being rail vs pool facing.
Can't compare to the 3+1 pricing, but this chap will pocket over $100k easily if he lets go above $550psfOriginally Posted by Unregistered
At $550psf, most ppl will grab at it :P
Since he is only asking for 570psf, I supposed he is prepare to lower it. If it is true many folks are willing to grap it at 550psf, he should be able to sell it easily if he is willing lower it some more. Let's seeOriginally Posted by Unregistered
Any thoughts on pros/cons for coastal living versus living on high ground?
As the risks arising from tusnamis, global warming/green house effect are increasing, wonder whether it's safer to live on higher ground?
Then again, mudslide/landslide/soil erosion are imminent problems for hillside living?
Recent reports in Jan this year on mudslide cases are around Hillview areas. Any incidents in the past of mudslide affecting residential areas at BT hill?
Last weekend, an agent did advertise for a rail facing unit (1270 sf) asking for 620 psfOriginally Posted by Unregistered
In this type of market, every owner asking for a lot, many agents told me they are quite fed up with it. In one case, the agent couldn't get the price near the owner wanted and yet owner asked him to raise the price by another 3% and advertise again
Typical of a seller marketOriginally Posted by Unregistered
Buy Singapore Press HoldingOriginally Posted by Unregistered
The agent needs to spend a quite a bit on advertising before can close a deal, who gain? you figure
Anyone know what's the two convenience shops selling? Are they occupying one or 2 units on the ground floor? Heard the management office is going to occupy one whole unit, true?
There are 2 convenience stores in Raintree???
According to the site plan that was at the show flat, block 95 will have the change room, shop, multi purpose room and management office below the ground floor units.
believe shops will be facing the landscape garden/pond. its in the brochure?Originally Posted by Makelele
LOriginally Posted by Unregistered
landscape garden is on elevated ground which is level 3. The ground floor units facing landscape garden is #03-xx. Shops on the other hand is adjacent block and they are below the landscape garden. In fact, the first two levels of blk95 combined to form one level. Residential units for blk 95 on level 3 upwards. That why the shops, multipurpose hall etc have higher ceiling because they are actually 2 levels combined.
Out of curiousity, what type of shops would you like?
Maybe 1 convenient store and a clinic/salon/pet groomer?
This size condo cannot sustain a clinic ...I'm a GP . I've sent an email to enquire about shops , will let u know if I get a response. Tried to call, but no one answering phone.Originally Posted by lincoln
1 convenience store and 1 eatery/ice-cream palour and a mini-salon would be nice.Originally Posted by lincoln
a 24 hr GP in the area would be great! Captive market man.Originally Posted by Unregistered
Hi all neighbours
I did a search on the new road Bukit Drive, refer to link below:
http://www.map.gov.sg/SD_LQ/INLIS_SD...indhede%20road
Notice that the new road Bukit Drive is "above" instead of "below" Le Wood in 2D-map? Wrote an email to inform SLA that the road Bukit Drive should be "below" Le Wood and join the old Hindehede road to form a Y-shaped instead, leaving no gap. Guy from SLA returned my query saying that their map is correct, the new road Bukit Drive should start between Le Wood and the public car park for nature reserve and then run behind Le Wood to end at Raintree. That's according to their proposal plan they have on hand.
Wonder whether there's any miscommunication between our developer and SLA? Hopefully they won't have to "tear down" the newly built Bukit Drive and built it further in.
Tried calling FCT but no one answer. Anybody bother to clarify with developer?
I have a feeling SLA is right and developer is wrong.