Why far right, pro-Russia Le Pen could win French presidential poll

Apr 11, 2022

Andrew Hammond

FAR right, pro-Russia and anti-Nato leader Marine Le Pen emerged in a strong second place on Sunday (Apr 11) and will face off against incumbent Emmanuel Macron for the French presidency on Apr 24 in what could be a nail-biter.

While Macron emerged in first place on Sunday with around 28 per cent, it was not the overwhelming victory that polls as late as last month projected. Le Pen scored her highest percentage of the vote of any of the 3 presidential campaigns she has been involved in, with approximately 23.5 per cent.

It is almost certain that Macron will not win close to the 66 per cent of the second round vote he secured in 2017. Indeed, a poll on Sunday night from Ifop Fiducial indicated that the second round ballot could be a nail-biter with a 51-49 per cent win for Macron. This is similar to a Harris poll last week which put Macron on 51.5 per cent to Le Pen's 48.5 per cent.

To be sure, Macron remains the favourite to beat her in the second-round, two-way run-off, and become the first re-elected president for some 2 decades. But French politics is volatile, not least with the impact of the Ukraine conflict.

Support for the far right in Sunday's first round was at its highest point yet: Le Pen and her extreme-right rival Eric Zemmour, a former talk show pundit, won around 33 per cent of support between them. It seems likely that most of Zemmour's voters will opt for Le Pen in 2 weeks.

Macron has been endorsed by the centre-left Socialists, who secured a historic low of 2 per cent on Sunday, and the centre-right Republicans who won just 5 per cent.

What will now help determine the outcome of the Apr 24 ballot is where the supporters of hard-leftist Jean-Luc Melenchon go. He secured around 20 per cent of the vote and while he has urged his supporters not to vote for Le Pen, he stopped short of endorsing Macron.

So, while Macron may appear in the home straight, French politics may still have a surprise or two in store in the two weeks to come. The unusual political times are highlighted by the fact that as Macron and Le Pen face off against each other, this is only the second time in the country's modern history that none of the mainstream centre-right, Republican, or centre-left, Socialist parties that have governed for almost all of the post-war era have qualified for the final round.

So further unexpected twists and turns cannot be ruled out - especially in a context of distrust of the political class, and of economic pain for many. Small wonder that financial markets have been jittery.

So with Europe in its most volatile period in years - if not decades - post-Ukraine invasion, Macron is by no means guaranteed re-election. So far, he has only partially succeeded in his goal of reducing the unemployment rate and re-industrialising France through innovation-led policies.

There remains widespread anti-establishment discontent - including the so-called yellow-shirt protests - fuelled by economic pain which could now be intensified following the sanctions against Russia; and significantly higher gas, electricity and food prices are likely.

French voters have for months already cited the cost of living and purchasing power as their No 1 concern ahead of the elections, as inflation surges on the back of rising commodity prices and tight supply chains. This is despite the fact that the government estimates gross disposable income - which economists use as a gauge of purchasing power - grew twice as fast under Macron's presidency as under that of his 2 predecessors.

Le Pen will seek to double down now on tapping into this economic pain - including a proposal to cut taxes on fuel - presenting herself as an anti-globalisation champion, including opposition to international trade and Nato. Her wider platform is centred on an anti-immigration project to prioritise native French people over non-French for housing, jobs and benefits, and to ban the Muslim headscarf from all public spaces - despite the fact that this is against the French constitution.

That she did so well on Sunday will dismay many in France - as well as internationally too. Should she pull off a victory in 2 weeks, it would be a severe blow for Brussels given her euroscepticism and France's eurozone membership, and that, alongside Germany, the country has traditionally been the twin-engine of EU integration.

Macron will hope to recapture the mood of last month when he was surging in the polls, styling himself as a wartime leader following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That he slipped in opinion surveys since then has been attributed to him devoting so much time to diplomatic talks with world leaders and coordination with European and other Western allies.

Aware of this critique, he is going after Le Pen hard in the last phase of the campaign, including on Russia; and she has had to distance herself from Russian President Vladimir Putin. Campaign leaflets that showed Le Pen shaking Putin's hand, of which over 1 million copies media claim had been printed, have reportedly been withdrawn by her campaign team.

Macron's main goal - now he has filled the vacuum of power in the political centre ground created by the collapse in support for the Socialists and Republicans - will be to make a pitch for the 26 per cent of voters who abstained, plus other non-mainstream voters, especially the approximately 20 per cent who voted for Melenchon. Macron's pitch is that, despite his faults, he is the better choice for the left and centre-right than Le Pen.

Nevertheless, markets will continue to be on edge for another 2 weeks as Macron and Le Pen seek to build a broader coalition of voters in a one-on-one stand-off. The yield on France's 10-year bonds rose to a 7-year high last week on concerns that Le Pen, with longstanding sympathies for Russia, may take power in the middle of the Ukraine war.

Taken together, this may make for a highly unpredictable finish to the campaign. While Macron has an edge, his lead is not insurmountable in what is a shifting sands socio-economic context.

The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics