Only 2 sentences:
1. Meeting Singapore’s long term needs.
2. Never allowing Teddy to have an actual example of a 99 LH that has run to 0 years and zero value. At least not in his lifetime.
Originally Posted by
teddybear
Since the house has a 99-years lease, obviously the developers have a obligation to ensure that the building can last at least 99 years right?
If can last at least 99 years, why tear down when they are only 20 years old?
A waste of manpower, resources, damaging to environment right?!
The three laws of Kelonguni:
Where there is kelong, there is guni.
No kelong no guni.
More kelong = more guni.