Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: En bloc sales bring out the worst in Singaporeans

  1. #1
    mr funny is offline Any complaints please PM me
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Default En bloc sales bring out the worst in Singaporeans

    June 1, 2008

    En bloc sales bring out the worst in Singaporeans

    By Jessica Cheam

    After a most spectacular year for the en bloc market last year, sales activity has finally frizzled out and for most parties involved, it is a welcome time-out. While property agents may lament the slowdown, one group of home-owners can heave a sigh of relief, as the threat of being forced to sell their homes retreats into oblivion.

    Well, for most, anyway.

    The recent debacle at the annual general meetings of two of the most iconic condominiums on the East Coast - Bayshore Park and Mandarin Gardens - proves that while the market has gone dead, en bloc woes have not, and will not, go away.

    Some points of contention that arose at the meetings were the use of proxy votes to influence decisions, and conflicts of interest arising over the roles of management councils and sales committees.

    In the course of my job, I have covered my fair share of en bloc deals, and as a non-partisan observer of proceedings, I have come to one conclusion about the 'uniquely Singapore' phenomenon that is the en bloc.

    It is ugly. And it brings out the worst in Singaporeans.

    Recent developments have also highlighted weaknesses in the law regarding collective sales and a private property owner's rights. This is despite the tightening of en bloc rules that kicked in last October, which ensure, among other things, that sales committees are properly elected, and collective sales agreements witnessed by lawyers.

    This has no doubt cooled the en bloc fever which gripped the nation last year, with a total of 116 collective sales generating record investment sales of $13.64billion.

    But some glaring flaws in the en bloc process remain. They include the distribution of sale proceeds, the role of the management council versus the sales committee, and the use of proxy votes at annual and extraordinary meetings.

    Let me elaborate.

    Firstly, owners should be compensated according to their flat attributes - height, cost of renovation, view.

    I have found that pro-en bloc types usually own low-floor units, with average furnishings and view. Anti-en bloc types, by contrast, typically own beautifully renovated top-floor units with stunning views - it is no wonder that these owners want more compensation or refuse to sell, according to how much they have invested in their homes.

    Current laws favour the average owner, who receives a pay-out equal to that of his top-floor neighbour, which is obviously unfair and has been the root of many conflicts and arguments.

    The Strata Titles Board (STB) has also previously ruled that renovations, along with interest, are not a 'deductible expense', which means your renovations count for nothing in a collective sale.

    To create a level playing field, provision should be made so that owners get fair value for their homes, perhaps by a government-appointed independent valuer.

    Secondly, the management council and sales committee should be kept separate by law, since the role of the former is to maintain the upkeep of the estate, while the other's role is to sell it.

    Current laws allow a sales committee member to be on the management council as well, but this has caused unhappiness at many estates - not just at Bayshore and Mandarin - where suspicion breeds among residents towards those who carry both positions.

    On the issue of proxy votes, it is theoretically democratic. But it also allows decisions to be skewed one way, because residents who want certain things changed will attend meetings and get proxies from similar-minded neighbours to achieve the results they desire.

    Meetings currently require only 30per cent of the total share value held by residents of an estate to attend, which enables decisions to be made without majority consent.

    This should be looked at. One solution could be to raise the minimum requirement of residents present to 80per cent, or instead to do away with proxy votes altogether so that voting cannot be manipulated - perhaps via an online or e-mail voting system.

    My advice in the meantime?

    Don't buy into a strata-titled property if you do not want to be forced to sell your home. Current laws do not ensure you will be able to live in your condominium unit until your dying days - even though, in my opinion, you should be able to.

    Most countries in the world allow this basic right, why can't we?

    Perhaps the lawmakers could take some of these issues into consideration when compiling the next set of refinements.

    Beyond the economic value of urban rejuvenation or boosting shareholder value for property developers, the en bloc phenomenon has ripped apart the moral fibres and harmony of our society.

    Is this a cost our society is willing to pay?

    On the one hand, I can sympathise with those who want to sell: they may be approaching retirement, or perhaps have plans to move away, and want to get the best price.

    But there are people who have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars beautifying their homes to be their retirement nests, plus those who value the environment they live in beyond any amount of realisable value.

    Do the former have the right to determine if the latter lose their homes? Owners still have a choice to sell their homes on the open market.

    In terms of 'specuvestors' who swoop in to snap up units in the hope of making a quick collective sale buck, their motivation is even more inexcusable. It is okay to want to make money, but do it without hurting someone else.

    It's not just Singaporeans who become embroiled in controversial sales, but also foreigners and permanent residents.

    I just hope that my estate never has to go through this nightmare. It is sure to do permanent damage to relationships which have taken years to build up, but which take only a sale notice to destroy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008


    I write from real experience. Living in a small strata titile development is pure hell. Worst are those with say 8 to 25 units. You can get the worst collection of human beings: Selfish, ignorant, stupid, petty and selfcentred. They do not want to put in effort by holding positions in the MC and yet are full of comments.

    If u have lived in such a development before, You will sure agree that it is pure bliss if you shift to large development(200 to 300 units) or the ultimate the HDB! Such a peace of mind is priceless!

    My advice : Never live in small strata developments. It is a killer environment full of stupid people and back stabbing rubbish!

  3. #3
    mr funny is offline Any complaints please PM me
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Default En bloc blues? There's hope, says support group

    June 12, 2008

    En bloc blues? There's hope, says support group

    WE REFER to the report, 'En bloc sales bring out the worst in Singaporeans' (June 1) by Ms Jessica Cheam.

    We are a group of concerned friends who love Singapore and the estates in which we live. While we welcome progress, we also cherish the old and familiar.

    Our cityscape has improved enormously in the past decades, thanks to the vision of Singaporeans and its leaders.

    But for our communities to forge together in good-neighbourliness, roots to grow deeper and future generations to see Singapore as home, we need to preserve our homes. We need to retain the kampung spirit that binds us.

    The recent spate of attempts in en bloc sales have impacted us in a way that is counter-productive to our nesting instincts and identity as a gracious society.

    We need to stop perpetuating these negative experiences. We want to be free from the constant worry of losing our homes to those who see them as mere financial tools for increasing wealth.

    In this spirit of proud home ownership and community living, we have formed an online community called Hope for Stayers ( where we share our experiences and educate others on the whole process of an en bloc sale.

    As 'stayers', we hope that we can contribute to the ethos and values needed to enable Singapore to evolve into a truly first-class progressive nation, where the term 'prosperity' reflects more than dollars and cents.

    Lastly, we agree with Ms Cheam's view that it would be prudent to consider a requirement for an 80 or 90 per cent quorum for an extraordinary general meeting to decide whether to push for en bloc sale. This is consistent with the current 80 or 90 per cent requirement for an en bloc sale to succeed.

    This would establish whether an estate has such support from the very outset. The current system of 30 per cent quorum encourages a possible abuse of MCST funds in repeated and wasteful attempts at the en bloc 'lottery' and results in the depletion of funds meant primarily to maintain the estate.

    We also hope that the entire en bloc sale process is tightened in such a way that it reflects and acknowledges the need for fair play and the deep-rooted sentiment that we have for our homes.

    Dai Qiujin

    (This letter carries 12 other names)

Similar Threads

  1. New condo sales in 2014 bring little cheer
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 16-01-15, 14:17
  2. Replies: 1
    -: 20-11-14, 15:23
  3. Developer sales in Q3 lowest since worst phase of global crisis
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 16-10-14, 12:54
  4. Bring in FT to help aging population?
    By westman in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 40
    -: 16-09-11, 23:21
  5. En-bloc sales: Review law on sales committees
    By mr funny in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 17-12-08, 16:50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts