Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Developers to get incentives to provide cycling facilities

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    10,829

    Default Developers to get incentives to provide cycling facilities

    http://www.straitstimes.com/singapor...ing-facilities

    Developers to get incentives to provide cycling facilities

    May 11, 2016

    Gross floor area exemptions may be given for facilities like parking, showers and lockers

    Danson Cheong
    Pang Xue Qiang


    Developers will be given incentives to provide facilities such as bicycle parking, showers and locker rooms in their new buildings, as part of a new government plan to encourage people to cycle.

    They may not have to pay for the floor area occupied by these facilities, as the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has said it is prepared to grant gross floor area (GFA) exemptions for such facilities.

    A URA spokesman told The Straits Times such exemptions will complement the Walking and Cycling Plan, adding that "the details are still being studied".

    Under the plan announced last week, cycling and walking facilities will be incorporated when buildings are designed from the get-go, starting from July.

    This is part of an overall effort to make cycling more attractive for the first and last mile of trips.

    On Monday, the Ministry of Transport said in Parliament that it will soon require developers to follow standards for bicycle parking, similar to existing requirements for minimum car parking spaces.

    While developers have welcomed the moves as a step towards a "car-lite" Singapore, they have also asked for concessions.

    Evia Real Estate managing director Vincent Ong said that the Walking and Cycling Plan could impose difficulties on developers, who already deal with tight space constraints.

    For instance, under URA rules, up to 40 per cent of a development's site area would have to be reserved for greenery, leaving little space for anything else, said Mr Ong.

    "The construction costs might not be significant, but what costs money are supporting services (such as ramps and staircases) and how you fit all these facilities into the development," said Mr Ong.

    Mr Terence Seah, divisional director of architecture firm Benoy, points out that many of these facilities - such as bicycle parking - would be built on the ground level, so developers could lose "highly profitable space".

    "If the Government gives some form of incentivisation, if these extra facilities could be GFA-exempt, it would be a more equitable way to encourage developers to take this on board," said Mr Seah.

    For a start, the Walking and Cycling Plan will apply to commercial developments, such as shopping complexes, offices, business parks and schools, but ST understands that it will eventually apply to residential developments too.

    Concerns about costs aside, experts feel that the plan could trigger a "proliferation of cycling" in the city and inspire new architecture.

    The streetscape would change gradually, with more ramps and dedicated paths for cyclists and other mobility devices, said Mr Charles Barguirdjian, studio director of architecture firm Atkins Global.

    National University of Singapore associate professor Cheah Kok Ming feels that there could be an increase in kiosks or counters within buildings, where cyclists could do simple repairs or pump their tyres.

    But Prof Cheah, who is from the department of architecture, also said that developments have to be well-connected to a developed cycling or walking network, if the Government's plan to encourage these modes of transport is to bear fruit. "A building could have bicycle parking and all the facilities, but there is no way a cyclist can get into the building safely if its surrounding is not well-designed," he said.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,837

    Default

    Any incentives to old, existing condos ?


    My condo used to have bicycle racks put up by the council/mcst ...

    subsequently, the following year, the new council chairman , removed it, claiming it violated BCA regulations... where racks put up at common areas required BCA approval ....


    money spent by 1 council....money thrown away by the next council ...


    wonder whats going thru their heads .... having they thought about discussing with BCA first ? before removing them ?


    brainless idiots ...

    wasting money

Similar Threads

  1. URA to developers: Don't get carried away with incentives
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 08-06-16, 19:37
  2. Does executive condo provide an arbitrage opportunity?
    By Kevin Tan in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 08-10-15, 09:40
  3. Ang Mo Kio: A pilot walking, cycling town
    By reporter2 in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 02-01-15, 16:23
  4. Which developers provide OpenNet Fiber Optic Box?
    By TOP in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 24
    -: 17-12-10, 15:56
  5. Some developers want GFA incentives restored
    By mr funny in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 2
    -: 17-09-08, 09:18

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •