Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: URA to seek feedback on short-term home rentals

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    10,829

    Default URA to seek feedback on short-term home rentals

    http://www.straitstimes.com/archive/...ntals-20141217

    URA to seek feedback on short-term home rentals

    Published on Dec 17, 2014 1:34 AM

    By Yeo Sam Jo


    THE Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) is to seek public feedback on whether rules on short-term rentals of private homes should be changed.

    The move follows a rise in popularity of websites such as Airbnb that let owners rent out their places for short stays - often at prices lower than at hotels.

    In September, Senior Minister of State for National Development Lee Yi Shyan called on the Government to study the implications of this development.

    The URA says current short- term stay guidelines are meant to "safeguard the amenity and living environment" of a residential development, and to ensure residents are not "adversely affected by the frequent turnover of transient occupiers".

    However, it has told The Straits Times it will conduct a survey to gather feedback on the issue. "Given the current public interest (in) the matter, URA will be carrying out a public consultation to assess if there is a need to review the policy," it said.

    It is currently illegal to lease a home for less than six months in Singapore. Private home offenders can be fined up to $200,000 and jailed for up to a year.

    A search on Airbnb, Roomorama and travelmob turned up more than 2,000 local listings.

    "We are thrilled that this conversation is happening," an Airbnb spokesman said.

    "We believe Singapore should join other leading global cities like San Francisco, London, Paris and Amsterdam, which have all reformed outdated housing rules to allow for home sharing."

    Roomorama co-founder Teo Jia En, 32, said a review of the rules could boost her business.

    "The demand for short-term stays is strong. You have tourists and working professionals who are in Singapore for short stints," she said.

    A 41-year-old business owner, who has been letting out a room in her Novena condominium unit via Airbnb since January, described the consultation as encouraging.

    Most of her guests are tourists who stay for a few days. "Many of us host for financial reasons. I'll be relieved if what I'm doing is not considered illegal."

    But such practices pose competition to hotels and serviced apartments, said Singapore Hotel Association executive director Margaret Heng.

    "Critical to the tourism industry... is how we ensure safety, security and hygiene standards in private outfits," she said.

    "If the (rules are revised), then it may be necessary to look at whether there is a need to license private premises that are rented out."

    Since last year, the URA has received 575 complaints involving the alleged rental of individual strata-titled private residential properties for less than six months.

    Most were about privacy and security, due to the presence of transient guests and their use of common facilities.

    [email protected]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    If you can't win them, join them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    I refer to your online feedback dated xx xxx 2014.

    2 We would like to clarify that the current legislation does not prevent URA from taking enforcement action against planning infringements such as short term stay. URA has put in guidelines for private home owners who intend to lease or rent their properties to safeguard the amenity and residential living environment of residential developments. These guidelines also provide clarity and transparency in the exercise of URA’s functions.

    3 The content which you had quoted, was not “URA’s statement”. Rather, we believe this was extracted from a posting by an operator of a short-term rental website (PandaBed). You can find URA’s original response on our website at this link, where we made it clear that we may enforce against infringements if the circumstances of the case warrants actions to be taken.

    http://www.ura.gov.sg/uol/media-room...orum12-07.aspx

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic...Singapore.html

    Two lose HDB flats for renting them to tourists

    http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapo...-them-tourists

    I am so glad this question exists on Quora. I hope to clear up the mass confusion. Upfront disclaimer, I am operating a short-term renting website at PandaBed | Asia's trusted alternative to hotels, which is why I have looked into the matter probably deeper than most. Singapore is only one of the countries the site covers ATM.

    In 2012, I consulted with a reputable law firm (name withheld) that has issued me a written response about the URAs statements on short-term leasing. Here are their findings paraphrased:

    "...the Guideline is not law as it is not codified in a statutory instrument. The URA, in response to a query from the public, made a statement in The Straits Times on 26 May 2012 (Leasing guideline) in which it conceded that the Guideline was not a ‘ruling’, but stressed that the URA “issue[s] guidelines from time to time to provide transparency and clarity on how the URA exercises its functions under the Planning Act”

    http://www.quora.com/Is-it-legal-to-...b-in-Singapore

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

  6. #6
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    Time to codify into LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcachon View Post
    http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic...Singapore.html

    Two lose HDB flats for renting them to tourists

    http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapo...-them-tourists

    I am so glad this question exists on Quora. I hope to clear up the mass confusion. Upfront disclaimer, I am operating a short-term renting website at PandaBed | Asia's trusted alternative to hotels, which is why I have looked into the matter probably deeper than most. Singapore is only one of the countries the site covers ATM.

    In 2012, I consulted with a reputable law firm (name withheld) that has issued me a written response about the URAs statements on short-term leasing. Here are their findings paraphrased:

    "...the Guideline is not law as it is not codified in a statutory instrument. The URA, in response to a query from the public, made a statement in The Straits Times on 26 May 2012 (Leasing guideline) in which it conceded that the Guideline was not a ‘ruling’, but stressed that the URA “issue[s] guidelines from time to time to provide transparency and clarity on how the URA exercises its functions under the Planning Act”

    http://www.quora.com/Is-it-legal-to-...b-in-Singapore

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,089

    Default URA needs more time to study short-term stays issue

    PUBLISHED7 HOURS AGO (19 May 2016)
    Yeo Sam Jo

    'No clear consensus' in public consultation on such stays in private residential properties, it says.

    After holding a public consultation on short-term rentals last year, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) said yesterday that it needs more time to review the issue.

    Results of the consultation, held from January to April last year, were "split, with no clear consensus", the URA revealed.

    "This issue on short-term stays is complex, multi-faceted, has wide- ranging implications and it warrants a careful and balanced review," it said, adding that it "needs more time to study the issue".

    Last year, the authority conducted the consultation to assess whether there is a need to review the policy on short-term rentals in private residential properties.

    It is illegal to lease a home for less than six months in Singapore. Private home offenders can be fined up to $200,000 and jailed for up to a year. Despite this, listings for short-term rentals have sprung up on home-sharing websites like Airbnb, PandaBed and Roomorama.

    The consultation came in two forms. The first was an online survey open to the public, which ran from January to February and had about 2,000 respondents.

    Discussions were also held with close to 100 stakeholders, including home-sharing portals, hotel and serviced apartment representatives, neighbourhood committees of private housing estates and condominium management corporations.

    The URA said that while participants acknowledged the need to accommodate the demand for short- term home sharing, there was also "strong endorsement" of existing controls on subletting.

    These controls are intended to "preserve the privacy and sanctity valued by the vast majority of home owners", it added.

    Noting that hotel and serviced apartment operators are subject to business taxes and requirements to ensure the safety and well-being of their occupants, the URA said: "There was important feedback that any change in rules should ensure a level playing field."

    It stressed that while the review is ongoing, the six-month rule still stands and enforcement will be taken against misuse.

    In 2013, 2014 and 2015, the URA received 231, 375 and 377 complaints on short-term stays respectively. From January to April this year, there were 161 complaints.

    A spokesman for Airbnb said: "We are disappointed that after more than a year since URA concluded its public consultation, there has not been a revision to URA's guidelines. We encourage Singapore to adopt fair and progressive rules to allow regular people to share their homes."

    PandaBed chief executive James Chua, 36, hopes that any change in regulation will consider the interests of all parties involved. "There are tourists who find home-sharing a bona fide better alternative to hotel rooms," he said. "The regulations need to take into account what the Internet brings to the market."

    Singapore Hotel Association executive director Margaret Heng said the consultation results indicate that there is concern relating to short-term rentals, especially in the areas of safety and security.

    "The hotel industry shares the same concern as these two factors are critical for the continued growth of the tourism industry in Singapore," said Ms Heng.

    A 43-year-old business owner, who wanted to be known only as Ms Chew, said the condominium unit next to hers has been used for short-term stays for a few years.

    "This did not bother us until my daughter's bicycle was stolen from outside our house in January.

    "I am not against short-term rentals but landlords should put in place adequate checks and balances, like making sure visitors are registered. I have three young kids in the house and am worried for their safety."

    Freelance property broker Alex Poh, 62, said short-term rentals could be regulated "like Grab and Uber", referring to the ride booking apps. He said: "It'll boost tourism and be good for our economy."

    http://www.straitstimes.com/singapor...rm-stays-issue
    Last edited by maisonjai; 19-05-16 at 13:24.

  8. #8
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    A lot of self-interests like those of AirBnB and similar companies at play here in lobbying to remove restrictions for short-term rental for private apartments!!!!!!!

    AirBnB and the like want to be responsible for the costs of contact tracing, costs of containing disease, and sterilizing of private estates if issues like SARS happened again in Singapore???
    Think about what would be the dire consequences and inability to do contact tracing and screen off SARS suspects if SARS hit Singapore at a time when short-term leasing of private apartments and HDB flats are allowed!
    So, URA better don't listen to them.........
    Otherwise URA may end up having to do MOH job............ (and MOH can push all responsibility to URA)................


    Quote Originally Posted by maisonjai View Post
    PUBLISHED7 HOURS AGO (19 May 2016)
    Yeo Sam Jo

    'No clear consensus' in public consultation on such stays in private residential properties, it says.

    After holding a public consultation on short-term rentals last year, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) said yesterday that it needs more time to review the issue.

    Results of the consultation, held from January to April last year, were "split, with no clear consensus", the URA revealed.

    "This issue on short-term stays is complex, multi-faceted, has wide- ranging implications and it warrants a careful and balanced review," it said, adding that it "needs more time to study the issue".

    Last year, the authority conducted the consultation to assess whether there is a need to review the policy on short-term rentals in private residential properties.

    It is illegal to lease a home for less than six months in Singapore. Private home offenders can be fined up to $200,000 and jailed for up to a year. Despite this, listings for short-term rentals have sprung up on home-sharing websites like Airbnb, PandaBed and Roomorama.

    The consultation came in two forms. The first was an online survey open to the public, which ran from January to February and had about 2,000 respondents.

    Discussions were also held with close to 100 stakeholders, including home-sharing portals, hotel and serviced apartment representatives, neighbourhood committees of private housing estates and condominium management corporations.

    The URA said that while participants acknowledged the need to accommodate the demand for short- term home sharing, there was also "strong endorsement" of existing controls on subletting.

    These controls are intended to "preserve the privacy and sanctity valued by the vast majority of home owners", it added.

    Noting that hotel and serviced apartment operators are subject to business taxes and requirements to ensure the safety and well-being of their occupants, the URA said: "There was important feedback that any change in rules should ensure a level playing field."

    It stressed that while the review is ongoing, the six-month rule still stands and enforcement will be taken against misuse.

    In 2013, 2014 and 2015, the URA received 231, 375 and 377 complaints on short-term stays respectively. From January to April this year, there were 161 complaints.

    A spokesman for Airbnb said: "We are disappointed that after more than a year since URA concluded its public consultation, there has not been a revision to URA's guidelines. We encourage Singapore to adopt fair and progressive rules to allow regular people to share their homes."

    PandaBed chief executive James Chua, 36, hopes that any change in regulation will consider the interests of all parties involved. "There are tourists who find home-sharing a bona fide better alternative to hotel rooms," he said. "The regulations need to take into account what the Internet brings to the market."

    Singapore Hotel Association executive director Margaret Heng said the consultation results indicate that there is concern relating to short-term rentals, especially in the areas of safety and security.

    "The hotel industry shares the same concern as these two factors are critical for the continued growth of the tourism industry in Singapore," said Ms Heng.

    A 43-year-old business owner, who wanted to be known only as Ms Chew, said the condominium unit next to hers has been used for short-term stays for a few years.

    "This did not bother us until my daughter's bicycle was stolen from outside our house in January.

    "I am not against short-term rentals but landlords should put in place adequate checks and balances, like making sure visitors are registered. I have three young kids in the house and am worried for their safety."

    Freelance property broker Alex Poh, 62, said short-term rentals could be regulated "like Grab and Uber", referring to the ride booking apps. He said: "It'll boost tourism and be good for our economy."

    http://www.straitstimes.com/singapor...rm-stays-issue

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    Who know maybe URA somebody got something from them. Time to call CPIB to check URA.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    https://www.techinasia.com/evictions...l-sites-airbnb

    Interestingly, James Chua, CEO of Singapore-based Pandabed, revealed in an answer on Quora that short-term renting for private property is actually not illegal here. Having consulted with a law firm, they found that the six-month minimum rental period stated by the URA is a guideline, and not a law:

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,089

    Default

    Let's see it develops, added this previous article. GEM has triple keys, i am curious why buyers are so keen and ended up balloting for such units.

    Property agents who broker short-term stays playing with fire
    Lynette KhooThe Business TimesSaturday, Apr 09, 2016

    AS hard times hit real-estate agents, some are starting to refer customers to accommodation operators or owners of residential properties for short-term stays.

    This raises the question of whether property agents who play middlemen for leases under six months long are implicated if the lessors they are acting for are indeed flouting the rules.

    The Council of Estate Agencies (CEA) is, however, unequivocal in its warning to agents acting as middlemen for such short-term leases.

    In response to queries from The Business Times, CEA acting deputy director (licensing) Chua Geck Siang said: "If there is evidence that a property agent has facilitated any breach of the rules on short-term leasing, the Council for Estate Agencies will look into the agent's conduct in conjunction with the relevant authorities.

    "Property agents have to be mindful at all times that they are required to comply with the Estate Agents Act (EAA) and its regulations when conducting estate agency work. They should not do anything that abets or facilitates anyone to breach any law or regulation."

    As far as the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) is concerned, it will take the whole chain of property owners, intermediaries and tenants or occupants to task for breaches of its minimum-stay requirement of six months in private residential properties.

    In normal circumstances, the commission earned for closing contracts with short tenures or for making referrals for serviced apartments would be uncompelling; agents typically clock in half-a-month commission for each year of tenancy.

    To be clear, BT's checks with a number of agents suggest that most of them toe the line. Some, however, are willing to take the risk, and may risk losing their CEA sales licence for this.

    Some property agents are found to be referring potential customers for stays of under six months for Oxley Thanksgiving Residence, St Thomas Lodge and Devonshire Apartments - developments that the URA says do not have planning permission to be run as serviced apartments.

    There are also agents who are listing short-term leases for private homes on PropertyGuru.

    Weighing in on this issue, ERA Realty key executive officer Eugene Lim said agents gain little from helping to market condominiums as serviced apartments for short-term stay. The risk they take is disproportionate.

    "Agents who engage in these activities are either desperate or not well-informed. If they want to earn this kind of money, they might as well drive (an) Uber (car) to earn money legally."

    KF Property Network managing director Tan Tee Khoon said that sales people are not supposed to facilitate the breaking of law. This violates CEA's code of ethics and professional client care as well as brings disrepute to the industry.

    "We take a serious view of infringement and have consulted with the URA on what is permissible. When tenancy agreements are submitted to us, we scrutinise them. If there is anything doubtful, we would require our salespersons to discharge themselves from handling the transactions," he said.

    The issue of short-term leases in residential properties is a perennial one.

    While the rules under HDB and URA prohibit the rental of residential properties for less than six months, enforcement is tricky, particularly for private properties.

    Further compounding this issue, home-rental websites such as Airbnb and Homeaway now provide a seamless way to match owners and tenants.

    The proliferation of studio and shoebox units, bought mainly by investors, has arguably contributed to an increase in very short-term lettings.

    Century 21 Singapore CEO Ku Swee Yong said it would help if various government departments came together to define the laws and increase enforcement. "Some landlords interpret URA's guideline to be a 'point of reference', not as a statement of law. This puts us in a difficult position when negotiating between landlords and tenants," he said.

    There has been strong demand for short-term leases, often from foreigners with good profile: they come to Singapore to work for a few months on projects or short-term studies, agents say.

    Agents note that some overseas MBA students come here for only a term or a few months, which is why many condominium units in Dover are offering short-term leases.

    Landlords are becoming less choosy in a soft rental market. Real estate salesperson Chris Choo said landlords ultimately hold the key to how units are rented.

    "They are the ultimate decision makers. If they cannot secure six-month leases, some may start to waver and bring it down to three months. If units are left vacant for months, some landlords may not have financial stability to hold for longer as there are loans to be paid."

    Mr Choo said sophisticated landlords know how to draft standard contracts of six months with early-termination clauses, and it is hard to ascertain whether it is a deliberate plan for tenants to exit early or if these premature departures are the result of unforseen circumstances, such as retrenchments.

    "While there are clear directions from the relevant authorities on letting and subletting rules, I have my doubts on how sharp the enforcement teeth can be, because when it comes to tenancy, it's something very hard to catch."

    http://business.asiaone.com/news/pro...s-playing-fire

  13. #13
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    So James Chua, CEO of Singapore-based Pandabed opening declared that URA lied that short-term renting is illegal?

    So now all of us are confused!
    Did URA lied or James Chua lied?

    I am inclined to believe in URA but URA's silence on such accusation is not comforting, and shouldn't URA do something about it???

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcachon View Post
    https://www.techinasia.com/evictions...l-sites-airbnb

    Interestingly, James Chua, CEO of Singapore-based Pandabed, revealed in an answer on Quora that short-term renting for private property is actually not illegal here. Having consulted with a law firm, they found that the six-month minimum rental period stated by the URA is a guideline, and not a law:

  14. #14
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    Thinking of Renting/Leasing through AirBnB? Beware of dead body in your property or you finding it! Don't let holidaying or being a landlord become a NIGHTMARE!


    Corpse found by group of friends in garden of Airbnb rental in France
    The woman's body was found at the end of the garden and the police are treating her death as murder

    ........................................




  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,089

    Default

    sorry duplicate old posting

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,837

    Default

    to date URA has not published their findings on this issue.


    Why disallow short term leasing, YET allow Airbnb to set up office in Singapore ?

    Government bodies need to get their acts together before they set laws to penalize the people ...

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Its the same with Grab and Uber.

    They ultimately want to let these companies in. The issue is just ironing out how.

    Quote Originally Posted by proud owner View Post
    to date URA has not published their findings on this issue.


    Why disallow short term leasing, YET allow Airbnb to set up office in Singapore ?

    Government bodies need to get their acts together before they set laws to penalize the people ...
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  18. #18
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    Short term home rentals is totally different from Grab and Uber, so they can't be compared altogether.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kelonguni View Post
    Its the same with Grab and Uber.

    They ultimately want to let these companies in. The issue is just ironing out how.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teddybear View Post
    Short term home rentals is totally different from Grab and Uber, so they can't be compared altogether.
    The worst is this. Foreign worker rental.

    each occupant should have at least 10 sqm of space.

    The maximum number of occupants in a residential unit is eight, no matter how big the unit is

    https://www.ura.gov.sg/uol/buy-prope...sidential.aspx

    Cheaper than worker dormitory with free parking, swimming pool, gym and steam room.

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/prope...public-housing

    Foreign workers in certain sectors barred from public housing but not private housing.

    https://sharonanngoh.com/2009/08/01/...reign-workers/

    PRIVATE apartments cannot be used as workers’ dormitories. However, to be classified as a dormitory, a unit needs to accommodate more than eight workers. So it is perfectly legal for a private apartment owner to rent to foreign workers, as long as there are no more than eight of them.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,089

    Default Is your Airbnb host secretly making millions?

    Some hosts in Singapore hold dozens of listings, our research shows

    BY HON JING YI [email protected]ISHED: 6:40 PM, NOVEMBER 14, 2016

    SINGAPORE — Airbnb is now the first website I visit whenever it is time for a vacation.

    I love that its listings often offer properties at only a fraction of the price of a hotel room, and even more that its hosts actually live in the town and city I am visiting. During one of my trips to Nice, my brother and I chose to skip dinner at a crowded restaurant to spend an evening hanging out with our host and his dog over coffee. Every host I have met has also been able to give us recommendations on the best local markets to visit, or trails to hike.

    Experiences such as these represent Airbnb at its very best, and articulate the company’s vision of creating a sense of belonging for every visitor, wherever he or she chooses to visit.

    Yet, those who use Airbnb frequently enough will also find that not every listing is someone’s home, and not every host is a homemaker hoping to make extra cash from a secondary residence, or a frequent traveller renting out his home while he is away.

    In fact, in Singapore alone, over 67 per cent of hosts who list their entire homes on Airbnb have more than one listing, and over 50 per cent of hosts have more than five listings, according to data obtained from Airbnb’s website by American writer Tom Slee in October and analysed by TODAY.

    It is not difficult to imagine why so many people have so many listings. One host known as “Hannah” on the site has as many as 57 listings — all of them entire apartments. She stands to make more than S$4.9 million in revenue, if every single one of her apartments is rented out every single day of the year.

    And she is only one of many hosts who have dozens of listings on the site. There’s “Nicholas” with 49 listings, who stands to make S$4.5 million in revenue a year; “Vincent” with 52 listings, who stands to make more than S$4.2 million; and “Kevin” with 47 listings and S$4.8 million in potential revenue. The list goes on.



    AIRBNB’S CRACKDOWN

    
It is a tricky issue, and one that Airbnb has vowed to deal with. A spokesperson from the company told TODAY that it removes hosts and listings when they “do not reflect our vision for our community and do not offer the authentic experience they seek”.

    “Around the world, the overwhelming majority of our hosts who share their entire home or apartment share only one listing. They are everyday people who open up their homes to travellers to earn a little extra income and pay their bills,” said the spokesperson, who declined to provide exact numbers.

    According to Airbnb, a typical host in Singapore also only makes approximately S$5,120 annually from sharing a home — far lower than the S$4.9 million that could potentially be generated from 57 listings.

    Differentiating between those who are running multi-million-dollar businesses on their site and those who are renting their own homes is a difficult problem, but one that Airbnb has to solve soon before its values are undermined.

    The company is already increasingly facing regulation in cities around the world, including San Francisco, Berlin, Barcelona and Amsterdam.

    In New York, Airbnb is battling a new Bill that would allow the authorities in New York state to crack down on hosts who advertise listings on rental sites like Airbnb for stays of less than 30 days. Lawmakers behind the Bill claim businesses such as Airbnb are disruptive to New York, making it increasingly difficult for those who live in the city to find affordable housing. In return, Airbnb filed a lawsuit against New York state, saying that the new law “ignored the voice of tens of thousands of New Yorkers”.

    “A majority of New Yorkers have embraced home sharing, and we will continue fighting for a smart policy solution that works for the people, not the powerful,” the company said in a statement on its website, adding that 78 per cent of Airbnb hosts in New York earn low, moderate or mid-range incomes.

    Here in Singapore, short-term stays of less than six months are illegal for private residential properties. According to the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), enforcement action was taken against 103 cases of unauthorised short-term subletting in private residential properties from Jan 2014 to June this year. TODAY also understands that while short-term rentals are illegal, it is not illegal to list an apartment on a rental site like Airbnb.

    The government is still reviewing the issue of short-term stays in Singapore, following its public consultation exercise in 2015 in which it sought feedback from the public and stakeholders on whether short-term stays in private residential properties should be allowed.

    “The issue of short-term stays is complex, multi-faceted, and has wide-ranging implications. It warrants a careful and balanced review, without a rush to conclusion,” said a URA spokesperson. “For example, we must carefully study its potential impact on neighbouring residents, vis-a-vis regulatory requirements to ensure the safety and well-being of occupants.”



    THE BENEFITS OF SHARING

    
Yet there are those who believe that hosts on Airbnb should be free to offer whatever resources they have to whomever they choose. As long as Hannah’s visitors and neighbours are happy with the arrangement, why shouldn’t she be allowed to run her business?

    Jim Tan, president of the Sharing Economy Association of Singapore, asserts that “the sharing economy incentivises people to offer their resources, be they existing or additional, which they wouldn’t offer otherwise”.

    “What if underutilised resources still can’t match the demand for sharing? This is where the sharing economy adds value by creating additional supply to match the unmet demand,” said Tan. “Whether or not creating additional supply is meant to merely earn a personal additional income or to make a business is beside the point.”

    Airbnb users are sanguine about hosts raking in the bucks even if they are their very neighbours. “I don’t mind (if my neighbours list their properties on Airbnb even if they don’t live there), as long as their visitors are not a public nuisance,” said Airbnb user Arif Rajab. “They need to abide by the same rules, like no smoking or drinking in the common areas, or keeping the volume of the television inaudible outside their homes, and not harassing their neighbours.”

    Property analysts TODAY spoke to say such a practice is unfair to the industry.

    Ku Swee Yong, CEO of International Property Advisor, suggested that some of these listings could be posted by companies who "lease apartments on a long-term basis, say for two years, and use Airbnb to operate a chain of hotel rooms" on a short-term basis.

    Pointing out that this makes the playing field uneven, Ku said such instances are occurring at the expense of proper hoteliers and service apartment operators, who have complied with strict guidelines under the Hotels Act. "Now we are allowing individual operators, who do not have to comply with the safety and security aspects of things, who are making money at the expense of hoteliers."

    Donald Han, managing director of Chestertons, a real estate consulting company, added that multiple listings could also be the result of some agents who do portfolio risk management, meaning they look after extra properties in some owners' portfolios and attempt to lease them out. While some agents will try to find long-term tenants, he said, "in some cases, they will try to get better rates by using Airbnb's daily or weekly rates".

    "It's against the law. They are playing around with danger," he said.

    http://www.todayonline.com/lifestyle...aking-millions

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    169

    Default

    I am sure SG gov will follow some practices from US city like SF or NY.

    The most important part is probably to ensure every listing owners to be registered with government agency and let Airbnb shares the revenue info directly for tax transparency.

    Others might involve restriction like number of rental days annually and let airbnb enforce it for every listings.

    https://www.cnet.com/news/san-franci...60-days-a-year

Similar Threads

  1. Scope for short-term private home rentals in Singapore: Lawrence Wong
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 13-02-18, 19:02
  2. Government to seek views on home rentals for short term
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 21-02-17, 11:29
  3. What next for short-term home rentals?
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 17-02-17, 17:51
  4. New private home category for short-term rentals under study
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 08-02-17, 19:39
  5. Short-term home rentals illegal, warn authorities
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 4
    -: 11-09-13, 20:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •