![Quote](images/SultanThemeVB4R/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Unregistered
Excuse me for saying so, but you are indeed quite green.
Let me, a seasoned property investor, teach you how to read caveats.
Firstly, you must stop using free-of-charge databases and sign up for the paid version of SISV Realink21 Caveat Database, where they will show you details like the floor and also which unit is being transacted.
I don't have the time to type out the whole thing here because it's very tedious, but just to give you some examples of transactions regarding Ardmore II.
The examples I use are mid-floor units because recently there had not been any transactions for the high-floor units.
Ardmore II
27 Dec 07 #10-01 : 2,024 sf at S$5,816,125 (S$2,874 psf)
3 Mar 08 #10-01 : 2,024 sf at S$4,242,231 (S$2,096 psf)
It's the same unit.
Before you get too happy again, jumping up and down, that the price has fallen by 27% in three months, let me tell you what is going on because you have obviously not bought a property before.
Even in the 1997 crash, the price doesn't decrease by 27% in three months, especially when the URA statistics in fact show that prices in the Core Central Region have gone up more than 4.4%.
What happened is that the "later" price of S$4,242,231 (S$2,096 psf) transacted on 3 Mar 08 is actually a duplicate submission of the caveat for the developer's sale to the first buyer (or speculator/flipper) when Ardmore II was launched in September 06.
Whereas the "earlier" price of S$5,816,125 (S$2,874 psf) transacted on 27 Dec 07 is the caveat for the speculator/flipper selling to another party as TOP nears.
Hence the flipper would have made $1,573,894 (or 37% profits) over a period of 1 years and 7 months.
Around the same time of the transaction, the lawyers for both transactions (i.e. developer vs flipper and flipper vs next buyer) will lodge the caveats, but sometimes one lawyer is slower (especially those that are on the bank's panel who are underpaid and which I have now stopped using, preferring to use my own even if they cost more), and the earlier caveat ended up appearing first.
Another thing is, you cannot compare high floor with low floor. Your free-of-charge caveat does not show the floor or unit. Those $3,000+ psf are on the very high floors. Unfortunately, there is no transaction for such units since the beginning of the year, so I can't compare.
Let me show you a few samples (before and after sub-prime). Since I am talking about mid-floor above (#10-01) let's choose some floors around this level.
Before Sub-Prime
15 Jun 07 #11-04 : 2,024 sf at $5,150,000 (S$2,545 psf)
After Sub-Prime
6 Feb 08 #11-01 : 2,024 sf at S$5,675,000 ($2,804 psf)
So what we see here is that prices are firm after sub-prime, if you compare units at the same level. This is also what the government statistics from URA showed you.
You can go and see other caveats like Newton Suites where you will find a lot of caveats being lodged recently at around $900+ psf when in fact everyone knows that the price of Newton Suites should be $1,800+ psf. Those $900+ psf actually refer to the developer's sale price to the speculator/flipper three years ago.
Let me show you three examples here.
Newton Suites
7 Jan 08 #27-01 : 797 sf at S$1,440,000 ($1,808 psf)
10 Jan 08 #30-01 : 797 sf at S$759,000 ($953 psf)
10 Jan 08 #17-03 : 1,238 sf at S$2,277,000 (1,839 psf)
To a green property investor like you, you may conclude that the price has plunged from $1,808 psf to $953 psf (47% "crash") within 3 days (from 7 Jan 08 to 10 Jan 08) and then within the same day (10 Jan 08) "surged" again to $1,839 psf 93% gain.
Let me assure you that I have been around for a long time, and have never seen property prices plunging by 47% within 3 days, nor rising by 93% within the same day.
I hope you have learned something. Every one starts out green but if you are humble and willing to learn, then one day you will also become a successful property investor like me.
Good night.