Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 62

Thread: Value of leasehold properties over time

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    97

    Default Value of leasehold properties over time

    A general question.

    99 years leasehold property, what happens to its value when it has only 60 years or even 50 years on the lease?

    Is it true that the value will drop because banks are more unwilling to lend?

    Some of the older leasehold properties may be in this situation. Has their market value dropped?

    Thanks for your views.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,420

    Default

    Read this.... Especially the table.

    http://www.sla.gov.sg/doc/ser/DP%20p...Jul%202000.pdf

    Value is leasehold land falls to zero in 99 years at an accelerating rate. Even if you go enbloc, the amount SLA charges increases exponentially as the lease runs out. Good luck to those who think LH is as good as FH.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,569

    Default

    Location Location Location.

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/singa...istings/sale/1

    39 yrs old

    Marine Parade 28 06 to 10 123.00 Standard 1975 $860,000.00 May 2013

    16 yrs old

    Geylang 28 16 to 20 120.00 Improved 1998 $785,000.00 Mar 2014
    Geylang 30 01 to 05 120.00 Improved 1998 $795,000.00 Mar 2014

    13 yrs old

    Sembawang 354C 11 to 15 113.00 Improved 2001 $525,000.00 Mar 2014

    old airport road
    3R Standard 06 to 10 56 1969 $388,000 Mar 2013
    Last edited by Arcachon; 23-04-14 at 03:17.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sh View Post
    Read this.... Especially the table.

    http://www.sla.gov.sg/doc/ser/DP%20p...Jul%202000.pdf

    Value is leasehold land falls to zero in 99 years at an accelerating rate. Even if you go enbloc, the amount SLA charges increases exponentially as the lease runs out. Good luck to those who think LH is as good as FH.
    Look at queens vs anchorage

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/project/queens-164


    Look at pearl bank

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/proje...-apartment-437

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    120

    Default

    It all depends what the leasehold property means to you. For self stay, for rental, for capital appreciation, for hedging, for parking idle money???

    There's so many and various reasons. Gone are the days where you throw a stone to pick a property and wait for money to grow. Textbook or googled information are not closely relevant now. Got to be in the market to feel it and due your own due diligence. No answers here in the forum will dictate and confirm your buy as a positive move.

    If you think London is for you, buy at all means. No one is bearing the liability for your decision.
    "How to make a fool useful for your properties? Let him continue to blow up Jurong prices and all other areas will keep up"

  6. #6
    xebay11 is offline New Launch Project Specialist
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcachon View Post
    Location Location Location.

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/singa...istings/sale/1

    39 yrs old

    Marine Parade 28 06 to 10 123.00 Standard 1975 $860,000.00 May 2013

    16 yrs old

    Geylang 28 16 to 20 120.00 Improved 1998 $785,000.00 Mar 2014
    Geylang 30 01 to 05 120.00 Improved 1998 $795,000.00 Mar 2014

    13 yrs old

    Sembawang 354C 11 to 15 113.00 Improved 2001 $525,000.00 Mar 2014

    old airport road
    3R Standard 06 to 10 56 1969 $388,000 Mar 2013
    HDB seems to buck the trend. PCs will drop in value.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    Landed Terrace at City-fringe, $280k only! 6 years lease left... If this is freehold, it would fetch $1.3 - $1.5 mil at least.

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...lang-singapore

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    390

    Default

    wah 6 years a bit extreme. i suppose buyer need to partition and subdivide and rent to workers.

    In any case, all else being equal, FH will fetch more than LH, my 3 yr old kid also know.

    but nothing is equal in life, and a lot of people made a lot of money from property that are leasehold in the last cycle.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Singapore is too young to witness the final stage of LH99 properties. And no one's investment horizon is more than 30yrs.

    The value of FH is only pronounced when the ownership last generations. Plus, you need a government that last that long, with recognition of land title that last as long.

    In UK, plenty of private owned LH pties expire the lease and the owner practically ask whoever on the land to get out. even the building sitting on top belongs to the owner if you do not demolish it. (UK is a good example because the kingdom last centuries, survived all the wars, and land title has been recognized throughout. )

    In SG, if this gov does not fall , in 50yrs time you will start to see pties worth 0. And only near then ppl start to really appreciate the meaning of FH. Today, whatever you say, ppl dun really give a sh**.

    HDB is different and special : gov guarantee to enbloc you when it gets old. It's the gov's obligation. It's almost like FH. (In fact you never even "lease" it. You really just "rent an apartment" from Gov).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    Singapore is too young to witness the final stage of LH99 properties. And no one's investment horizon is more than 30yrs.

    The value of FH is only pronounced when the ownership last generations. Plus, you need a government that last that long, with recognition of land title that last as long.

    In UK, plenty of private owned LH pties expire the lease and the owner practically ask whoever on the land to get out. even the building sitting on top belongs to the owner if you do not demolish it. (UK is a good example because the kingdom last centuries, survived all the wars, and land title has been recognized throughout. )

    In SG, if this gov does not fall , in 50yrs time you will start to see pties worth 0. And only near then ppl start to really appreciate the meaning of FH. Today, whatever you say, ppl dun really give a sh**.

    HDB is different and special : gov guarantee to enbloc you when it gets old. It's the gov's obligation. It's almost like FH. (In fact you never even "lease" it. You really just "rent an apartment" from Gov).
    If the aging leasehold property gets enbloc, the next group of buyers will have to pay for the renewed lease, and it is not going to be cheap. There is a possibility that renewal could be on 60-year basis to keep houses affordable. The premium for new SERS flats may also go up.

  11. #11
    xebay11 is offline New Launch Project Specialist
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    HDB is different and special : gov guarantee to enbloc you when it gets old. It's the gov's obligation. It's almost like FH. (In fact you never even "lease" it. You really just "rent an apartment" from Gov).
    HDB "almost freehold", never thought if it that way, maybe next time enblocees will be given shorter lease and will be according to what you originally had left as balance.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xebay11 View Post
    HDB "almost freehold", never thought if it that way, maybe next time enblocees will be given shorter lease and will be according to what you originally had left as balance.
    HDB cannot play play. There are a lot of political costs.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Unless the leasehold property is more than 70 years old, the decrease in value as a percentage of freehold is actually quite gradual. A leasehold property that is more than 40 years old for example still has about 80% of the freehold value. So its not true that leasehold will drop drastically once it becomes aged. In Sg, i think its safe to assume that when a private leasehold property crosses the 50+ years mark (still has about 75% of the freehold value), enbloc or some form of redevelopment (conservation like in Pearl bank case) would have already taken place.

    Though it is true that the lease top up and Differential Premium (DP) would increase over time when an old devt is up for redevelopment, one must not forget that this is a direct result of the increase in the value of land which the property sits on over time, leasehold regardless. Do you think the value of land 40 years from now will be the same as today? With the potential for enbloc or redevelopment for leasehold property as they get older, there will always be value for leasehold props in SG.

    End of the day, one must never forget that SG is just an island.

    cheers all.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Singapore government biggest income comes from selling LH lands, and it will be in the government's interest to ensure that their customers' interest are protected.

    One way to do that, is to constantly invest in infrastructure to boost the land value, especially for LH estate. And this should give older LH property a chance to get en bloc before 99 years lease expire.

    Having said that, Singapore government can only continue to do that if they are given strong support for their policies, so come 2016 Singaporeans, should cast their vote wisely.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  15. #15
    xebay11 is offline New Launch Project Specialist
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33 View Post
    Singapore government biggest income comes from selling LH lands, and it will be in the government's interest to ensure that their customers' interest are protected.
    Even if the customer's interest are not protected what can you do about it? See LHL's reply on the pinoy party to be held in NA City, he is more worried about what the world thinks then what his people think and it is the people who are doing the voting.....so?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33 View Post
    Singapore government biggest income comes from selling LH lands
    this statement is factually incorrect. land sale proceeds are not income of the gov. you can check the budget.

    and let's really not mix HDB into this LH->FH story. HDB is so special, it has "no lease".

    another thing, dun assume (or take it for granted) the end of a LH pty is enbloc. Again in UK, many such LH owners simply let the lease lapse and never bother to sign on "enbloc", for which the existing "leasee" will get a payoff. In SG so far all the enbloc can happen easily because the owner is the Gov. If the land is owned privately, you can be sure the "enbloc" will be very different. Think what FEO will do with its Silversea 30ys down the road. It can ask whatever it wants. Again SG is too young to see this.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    460

    Default

    In a bull market, people does not care whether it is LH or FH as the price difference is not so pronounced. But when the tide turns, people will see the value of FH when you compare them, especially when the 2 properties are in close proximity.

    Again there are many points of contention when it comes to valuing the land, and location/ surrounding plays a most important part.

    Whether or not LH becomes worthless or not, only time will tell
    When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    11

    Default

    There is no doubt that FH land is more valuable than LH given all else are the same. Its a no brainer cos with FH land there is no need for lease top up, only intensification of use if the plot ratio changes. But to say that LH land drecreases exponentially in value over time or its worth '0' in 50 years time is an overstatement as no owners are so stupid to let the lease lapse and do nothing about it. That is unless of course they are sited on some wasteland that has not appreciated in value for the last 50 years or govt has some other use for the land and does not approve the lease renewal.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    this statement is factually incorrect. land sale proceeds are not income of the gov. you can check the budget.

    and let's really not mix HDB into this LH->FH story. HDB is so special, it has "no lease".

    another thing, dun assume (or take it for granted) the end of a LH pty is enbloc. Again in UK, many such LH owners simply let the lease lapse and never bother to sign on "enbloc", for which the existing "leasee" will get a payoff. In SG so far all the enbloc can happen easily because the owner is the Gov. If the land is owned privately, you can be sure the "enbloc" will be very different. Think what FEO will do with its Silversea 30ys down the road. It can ask whatever it wants. Again SG is too young to see this.

    http://www.transitioning.org/2012/07...-in-singapore/
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boonlaysg View Post
    There is no doubt that FH land is more valuable than LH given all else are the same. Its a no brainer cos with FH land there is no need for lease top up, only intensification of use if the plot ratio changes. But to say that LH land drecreases exponentially in value over time or its worth '0' in 50 years time is an overstatement as no owners are so stupid to let the lease lapse and do nothing about it. That is unless of course they are sited on some wasteland that has not appreciated in value for the last 50 years or govt has some other use for the land and does not approve the lease renewal.
    FH property is only worth the title if you can keep it forever. For those who own FH apartment or condo, you are only acting as a custodian for the land for as long as the apartment is still standing. Once its en bloc, its doesnt belongs to you and developer will not pay for the the future value of your FH land.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,163

    Default

    Do u want your FH to last forever? Most properties become very old and high maintenance fee kicks in. Most likely rot when 50yrs old and living condition is bad, u get leaking pipes, rusty water pipes, sewage problem.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    290

    Default

    What are the options when lease gets shorter?

    And how to calculate the cost?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    ??? Even this sensational article you quoted also said :

    "In Singapore, income from government land sales is booked directly into reserves and not reflected as revenue in the annual budgets."

    ????

    As I said earlier, if u dun believe, go check the official budget from MOF site.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,569

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine23 View Post
    What are the options when lease gets shorter?

    And how to calculate the cost?
    This is one of the option.

    http://www.stproperty.sg/articles-pr...ty_News_230414

    Pearl Bank owners bank on conservation order

    http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=358211

    There are 65 years remaining on the leasehold site along North Bridge Road, and it could cost an estimated $8.5 million to top it back up to 99 years.
    Last edited by Arcachon; 23-04-14 at 20:42.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,569

    Default

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/prope...-up-applicatio

    More building owners are likely to seek lease top-ups from authorities as the stock of buildings developed on 99-year leasehold sites sold by the Singaporean government since the late 1960s gets older.

    Since 2007, the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) has processed 56 applications for lease extensions, but only 60 percent were approved and the rest were rejected.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    637

    Default

    http://www.orangetee.com/Research/RE...ldAnalysis.pdf

    regardless of what someone wants to believe - there are clear differences between the two.

    common sense dictates it.

    However common sense is sometimes not that common.


    I have enbloc'd 99 Yr LH and enbloc'd FH - If you think you don't get more from a developer because they don't have to pay development charges and leasehold top for FH - best of luck to you.
    Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon - it knocks over the pieces, craps on the board and flies back to it's flock to claim victory.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    ??? Even this sensational article you quoted also said :

    "In Singapore, income from government land sales is booked directly into reserves and not reflected as revenue in the annual budgets."

    ????

    As I said earlier, if u dun believe, go check the official budget from MOF site.
    Why do we even need to talk about budget or no budget. Obviously it is in the government interest keep the land revenue away from the budget so they can tell you that they are steering a very tight ship, and they need to be prudent about spending and tax more.

    Ultimately, its just left and right pocket, money still goes to government.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine23 View Post
    What are the options when lease gets shorter?

    And how to calculate the cost?
    Actually is not overly cumbersome to calculate what a potential enbloc property is worth. Basically you just have to factor in lease renewal cost and intensification of land use cost. SLA website has one example on how this can be calculated. Also land sales information is aplenty in the public domain and one can have an estimate of how much the chief valuer will value that piece of land which the property sits on. Its a very worth while exercise because if a particular property is selling below its fair value, then it represents a buying opportunity and to wait for the en-bloc which as I have suggested earlier, will definitely come. just a matter of time. In fact there is more urgency or impetus for leasehold owners to consider ennbloc as the property ages since the cost to developer will only go up (albeit gradually) as the property ages. For FH, as there is no so called time frame, owners might be less keen to consider the enbloc route. I think many bros here have missed a key fact about aged property, It is not the building units that holds the value. It is that piece of grassy land underneath them.

    Cheers.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boonlaysg View Post
    There is no doubt that FH land is more valuable than LH given all else are the same. Its a no brainer cos with FH land there is no need for lease top up, only intensification of use if the plot ratio changes. But to say that LH land drecreases exponentially in value over time or its worth '0' in 50 years time is an overstatement as no owners are so stupid to let the lease lapse and do nothing about it. That is unless of course they are sited on some wasteland that has not appreciated in value for the last 50 years or govt has some other use for the land and does not approve the lease renewal.
    Sure or not bro?

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...-lor-3-geylang

    Terrace at $210k only! 6+ yrs lease left. Nothing else they can do leh except rent or sell and see it become $0

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leesg123 View Post
    Sure or not bro?

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...-lor-3-geylang

    Terrace at $210k only! 6+ yrs lease left. Nothing else they can do leh except rent or sell and see it become $0
    landed property really has got no choice because government will just let it lapse before revising the plot ratio. So always avoid buying LH landed property
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

Similar Threads

  1. Leasehold properties sitting on freehold land
    By Arcachon in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 25-12-21, 10:39
  2. Residents of leasehold properties sitting on freehold land
    By Arcachon in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 22-01-20, 13:24
  3. Replies: 0
    -: 16-09-18, 08:25
  4. Time to revisit SLA Leasehold Table amid collective sale fever?
    By reporter2 in forum En Bloc Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 23-04-18, 19:11
  5. Prices of leasehold non-landed homes more resilient than freehold properties: Study
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 16-04-15, 18:05

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •