Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 63

Thread: Inflating property price to beat LTV restriction?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default Inflating property price to beat LTV restriction?

    Assuming you have only $200K, you want to buy a $1m investment property, buy can only borrow $500k due to LTV.

    Possible solution is that you get the seller to inflate the price to $1.6m so that you can borrow $800,000K from the bank. In return, you take up a short term loan to make round trip of $200K + $600K (short term loan) through the buyer and then you retire the loan.

    Disadvantage is of course you need to pay higher stamp duty, but the advantage is that you could now own a property.

    The above is just a simplified example for discussion sake.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,624

    Default

    So Clever, in the US they did it this way, called Cash Back. You buy 1 million they give you 200,000 back.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    There is such a thing called valuation. I don't think bank can let you inflate loan by so much.

    I doubt anyone wants to increase their loan quantum like this though...
    The three laws of Kelonguni:

    Where there is kelong, there is guni.
    No kelong no guni.
    More kelong = more guni.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelonguni
    There is such a thing called valuation. I don't think bank can let you inflate loan by so much.

    I doubt anyone wants to increase their loan quantum like this though...
    loan quantum is still the same if you are buying your first property

    80% of $1m = 50% of $1.6m = $800k
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    120

    Default

    obviously you can t put this on the s and p. Seller decide to play punk you die jialat jialat

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    The banks valuation can't be that far off, and I believe you need to declare if you have any discount kick backs from seller etc. If found out, they can call back the loan and the buyer's property can go up lorry.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Not possible, for a higher loan quantum, you'd have to be earning much higher for the bank to even grant you that amount.
    Ride or Die

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33
    Assuming you have only $200K, you want to buy a $1m investment property, buy can only borrow $500k due to LTV.

    Possible solution is that you get the seller to inflate the price to $1.6m so that you can borrow $800,000K from the bank. In return, you take up a short term loan to make round trip of $200K + $600K (short term loan) through the buyer and then you retire the loan.

    Disadvantage is of course you need to pay higher stamp duty, but the advantage is that you could now own a property.

    The above is just a simplified example for discussion sake.
    You teach pple go holan.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Autumnwinds
    Not possible, for a higher loan quantum, you'd have to be earning much higher for the bank to even grant you that amount.
    Do you mean its possible if your income could qualify for the loan.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mosaic
    obviously you can t put this on the s and p. Seller decide to play punk you die jialat jialat
    It could possibly be done between family members, partner relatives or friends.

    Assuming your relative is selling and you are want to buy. So you orchestrate this round trip scheme to overcome the LTV restriction.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    616

    Default

    err... you know what LTV stand for?

    I thought it is Loan To Valuation? Do they care what your selling price is?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    317

    Default

    Definitely not possible... the valuer will never give you valuation of 1.6m when it is only worth 1m...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wind30
    err... you know what LTV stand for?

    I thought it is Loan To Valuation? Do they care what your selling price is?
    Why you pichar his pipe dream?

    He haven't say his relative is the property valuer...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Not possible, if caveat shown 1.6m, tax man will go after the seller.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southbank
    Posts
    9,624

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adva181
    Not possible, if caveat shown 1.6m, tax man will go after the seller.
    Why? Is it gov collect more Tax, the Tax man need to investigate, maybe they got noting better to do is it. If I am the Tax man I would say it the job of MAS not IRAS.

    Or maybe you might say the gov will stop you from selling your property too high.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adva181
    Not possible, if caveat shown 1.6m, tax man will go after the seller.
    why would tax man go after seller when there is no such thing as a capital gain tax? The only tax is SSD, which only affect those who sold their property within 4 years from purchase date.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    331

    Wink

    Ya maybe it's MAS and not tax man.
    You just sold ur property for "1.6m"
    But your bank did not reflect the additional "600k".

    My friend sold his condo x 2 and received 12m. The very moment the money is credited into his bank account, the next day Iras called to enquire about the money and transaction.

    And I think the lawyers will not "help"
    you to do so as they need to collect "800k" from you to the seller.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adva181
    Ya maybe it's MAS and not tax man.
    You just sold ur property for "1.6m"
    But your bank did not reflect the additional "600k".

    My friend sold his condo x 2 and received 12m. The very moment the money is credited into his bank account, the next day Iras called to enquire about the money and transaction.

    And I think the lawyers will not "help"
    you to do so as they need to collect "800k" from you to the seller.
    In this case, MAS is only concern about the source of fund, they are not concern if you gamble it away in Casino or give it to your mistress.
    So no issue on the round tripping if you ask me.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    331

    Default

    I rem last time FEO used to do this, if the property cost is 1m and you only have 100k, they can mark up the selling price to 1.1m but you have to pay all the difference in SD n interest.
    It is easier if its direct from developer, but if you do it vs resale owner, I doubts lawyers from both sides will help and bank normally do not give valuation 10% higher than previous sale unit.

    I still rem many years ago when I buy my property in D1, the bank are reluctant to match the valuation unless I took a lower LTV.

    Bank usually bias new launch against resale. Example Corals can sell 3000psf and bank will match the valuation but if you try to buy Carribean at 2500psf, your valuation sure rejected.
    Last edited by Adva181; 10-07-13 at 09:08.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33
    In this case, MAS is only concern about the source of fund, they are not concern if you gamble it away in Casino or give it to your mistress.
    So no issue on the round tripping if you ask me.
    Maybe u try 1st den let us know if successful

    And why last time only FEO doing it is because they are not listed.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33
    Assuming you have only $200K, you want to buy a $1m investment property, buy can only borrow $500k due to LTV.

    Possible solution is that you get the seller to inflate the price to $1.6m so that you can borrow $800,000K from the bank. In return, you take up a short term loan to make round trip of $200K + $600K (short term loan) through the buyer and then you retire the loan.

    Disadvantage is of course you need to pay higher stamp duty, but the advantage is that you could now own a property.

    The above is just a simplified example for discussion sake.
    wah piang, i hope u know that people have been convicted for such practices before.


  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    like that hamilton scott also roundtripping le. from 3000psf suddenly jump to 5000psf.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    317

    Default

    I hope someone will propose this to me when buying my property.

    1mm sell as 1.6mm...

    after execute liao then i decide if i want to return him the 600k.....


    I might even propose to him why not inflat to 3mm? then he no need downpayment at all and still can get 2mm back from the bank....

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    After signing the contract, i will pretend there is no private agreement
    Quote Originally Posted by Condo Kaiser
    I hope someone will propose this to me when buying my property.

    1mm sell as 1.6mm...

    after execute liao then i decide if i want to return him the 600k.....


    I might even propose to him why not inflat to 3mm? then he no need downpayment at all and still can get 2mm back from the bank....

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    like that hamilton scott also roundtripping le. from 3000psf suddenly jump to 5000psf.
    goodness gracious 5000psf!!! for these whales they already do not need to round-trip....

    but at this price i really start to wonder...

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wind30
    err... you know what LTV stand for?

    I thought it is Loan To Valuation? Do they care what your selling price is?
    Maybe you can write to your good friend at IRAS or MAS to ask them to look into this.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Someone just paid $2922psf for a 8902sqft landed property at Sentosa.
    A whopping $26m for a 8902sqft?? And purchaser has got HDB address.

    I am just wondering what is going on there.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  28. #28
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adva181
    Ya maybe it's MAS and not tax man.
    You just sold ur property for "1.6m"
    But your bank did not reflect the additional "600k".

    My friend sold his condo x 2 and received 12m. The very moment the money is credited into his bank account, the next day Iras called to enquire about the money and transaction.

    And I think the lawyers will not "help"
    you to do so as they need to collect "800k" from you to the seller.
    I believe u, I kena called before also.
    Blackjack21trader's 2014 Celestial Prediction: Year of The Crazy Horses. ( Coming This Fall ) www.sglion.com

    "Not just one horse, but the whole bloody herd of crazy horses ! "- The Illuminati

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adva181
    Ya maybe it's MAS and not tax man.
    You just sold ur property for "1.6m"
    But your bank did not reflect the additional "600k".

    My friend sold his condo x 2 and received 12m. The very moment the money is credited into his bank account, the next day Iras called to enquire about the money and transaction.
    ......
    but...but....but...bank accounts is supposed to be private. MAS cannot suka2 any old how check people's bank acct le.

    ooop, i just woke from my dream, USA, land of the free also have massive spying programs, what more authoritarian states like Singapore.
    Remember: your vote is not a secret. 2016, vote PAP.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo33
    Someone just paid $2922psf for a 8902sqft landed property at Sentosa.
    A whopping $26m for a 8902sqft?? And purchaser has got HDB address.

    I am just wondering what is going on there.
    when you sign OTP, S&P, u use what address?
    many foreigner used their property agent's HDB address for correspondence purposes.

    are you really that interested?
    you have squarefoot, you know address already. then pay money lor. no need to wonder anymore.
    Last edited by hopeful; 10-07-13 at 13:42.

Similar Threads

  1. A property trust to beat ABSD? Beware the drawbacks
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 26-09-18, 22:13
  2. Some beat property cooling measures, others redo sums
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 09-07-18, 23:58
  3. Plot Ratio and Height restriction
    By Wolverine23 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 23
    -: 24-05-14, 11:04
  4. Should there be restriction on landed property?
    By Ringo33 in forum Landed Property
    Replies: 99
    -: 24-02-13, 11:45
  5. Valuation the culprit in artificially inflating HDB flat prices
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 3
    -: 28-06-08, 23:58

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •