Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 290

Thread: New Cooling Measures

  1. #151
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemonlaw
    Haha...heng ar...I got 2 fully paid property and 1 under mortgage.

    No impact on me.
    You good lor, win liao lor. I am not over leveraged, but very borderline ! But I still worry lor not for the current CM, but for something else which I hope they missed.

    Woahahahhahahahahhahah

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    So according to your formula, the previous example is :

    600+0 / 10 = 60 ? How can 60 years old borrow for 60 years? Pls enlighten
    Alamak this number is the derived "income weighted age", I.e. such joint applicants are treated as age 60.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk
    Alamak this number is the derived "income weighted age", I.e. such joint applicants are treated as age 60.
    Sigh yo.....you should go MAS lah... Now I understand liao LOL

  4. #154
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    You guys wanna know what is the next thing I scared of. That is, the policy I hope they missed out? Hehhehehhhehhhhh see you guys smart or not.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    You guys wanna know what is the next thing I scared of. That is, the policy I hope they missed out? Hehhehehhhehhhhh see you guys smart or not.
    Hint: this one har, the angmo government or USA very good at one lor...hehehehhehehehhehehehehhe not QE hor!

  6. #156
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    Hint: this one har, the angmo government or USA very good at one lor...hehehehhehehehhehehehehhe not QE hor!
    Hehehehehehe

  7. #157
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    Hehehehehehe
    Those know dun say here hor.heheheheheheheh not interest rates hor....

  8. #158
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    Those know dun say here hor.heheheheheheheh not interest rates hor....
    Hint : This one has the same initials as our previous Prime Minister hor....heheheheheh

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,163

    Default

    This new cooling measure will make it harder for people to buy back after selling. Less people will be selling.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by star
    This new cooling measure will make it harder for people to buy back after selling. Less people will be selling.
    Hey ! U r right ! Why didn't I see that. Good thinking

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    Hint : This one has the same initials as our previous Prime Minister hor....heheheheheh


    I know in US income from home ownership , be in capital gain, rental income etc ..are not taxed as much as profit and dividends from stocks ...

    resulting in a lot of investments in real property ... and partly contributed to subprime


    is this something you are thinking of ?

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smartboy2
    LAI LIAO LOR

    I was still telling my dad earlier that J gateway fully sold and there most probably be a measure soon.


    BUT....... SO SOON!???
    Because some R said Khaw will lim Kopi with Sham while reading condosingapore.
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  13. #163
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Lion king, I can't sleep without knowing the answer to your riddle.
    Is it General Consumption Tax?- whatever that is.

    or maybe Goods Consumption Tax?

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Genuine question, do people really take up to 60% installment??

    I'd consider that over stretching. And I remember that even 50% of total gross income is considered risky, and banks are not as lenient before in granting loans.
    Ride or Die

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    Hint : This one has the same initials as our previous Prime Minister hor....heheheheheh
    But it's pro business sg govt
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  16. #166
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    To know the real impact of this measure, one must know the existing bank policies and usual practices when they give out housing loans.
    If banks have already been adhering to similarly strict policies or practices, say they use medium rate of 3% (slightly less than this time round's 3.5%) to calculate TDSR, then the impact would be minimal.
    If banks have been too lax before, then there will be some impact.

    We need forumers who just took loans in recent years and who have been able to understand how banks assess his TDSR and his eligibility, to contribute here, in order to gauge the impact. This is how a forum can really help.

  18. #168
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    That's capital gain tax !

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    You gave yourself credit. Thanks

    Quote Originally Posted by wind30
    FINALLY.

    borrowers named on a property loan to be the mortgagors of the residential property for which the loan is taken;
    “guarantors” who are standing guarantee for borrowers otherwise assessed by the FI at the point of application for the housing loan not to meet the TDSR threshold for a property loan to be brought in as co-borrowers; and
    in the case of joint borrowers, that FIs use the income-weighted average age of borrowers7 when applying the rules on loan tenure.


    Would you believe I actually spent like close to an hour some months back talking to some MAS officer on the phone, explaining to them the average age problem.

    The stupid officer still keep trying to defend it and they say the banks will use the "proper" age and they will monitor it.

    I was like, duh.... all these measures are in place because the banks cannot be trusted to be prudent. Given clinching a business, they will try to sell the loan by using the youngest age of the borrowers.

    I told them specifically that they have to use the income weighted average age so it is CLEAR CUT. why make it so ambiguous???
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  20. #170
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by princess_morbucks
    That's capital gain tax !
    It is targeted at specific income brackets if u read wiki carefully. Very scary hor!

  21. #171
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    To know the real impact of this measure, one must know the existing bank policies and usual practices when they give out housing loans.
    If banks have already been adhering to similarly strict policies or practices, say they use medium rate of 3% (slightly less than this time round's 3.5%) to calculate TDSR, then the impact would be minimal.
    If banks have been too lax before, then there will be some impact.

    We need forumers who just took loans in recent years and who have been able to understand how banks assess his TDSR and his eligibility, to contribute here, in order to gauge the impact. This is how a forum can really help.
    I second that. Good call

  22. #172
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ecimbew
    Because some R said Khaw will lim Kopi with Sham while reading condosingapore.
    Lol....u must be joking.. Funny.

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Currently Active Users: 2355 (157 members and 2198 guests)
    Most users ever online was 13,691, 12th January 2013 at 01:01 AM.


    Judging from the above number, this CM is not as strong.

  24. #174
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,429

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Currently Active Users: 2355 (157 members and 2198 guests)
    Most users ever online was 13,691, 12th January 2013 at 01:01 AM.


    Judging from the above number, this CM is not as strong.
    People still on vacation?
    Or system not detecting properly?

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default

    Impact is limited to Jurong East only?
    Yee ha! Did I tickle your funny bone?


  26. #176
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ecimbew
    But it's pro business sg govt
    That I agree. That is why I think the chances of it happening is low, but if happens it can impact me the most due to inheritance

  27. #177
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    My personal feel is that it doesn't differ much from the current practice. Why? this is because MAS has been talking with banks since a few months ago, and MAS, as a regulator, wouldn't want to kill banks' business, MAS couldn't even afford the new loans to show year-on-year declines.

    I'm not sure about the current practice as banks never question me when I took loans, however, my guess is that they didn't have a standardized framework to assess TDSR for all loans using 3.5%, what banks did were perhaps only looking at individual mortgage loans, applying a rate like 2.5% or 3%, they probably applied some haircuts to rental too, and banks are no-idiot, while they have been loose in the above, they probably applied a stricter and lower ratio for this individual mortgage service ratio, probably in the region of 40% to 50%. What MAS did was really to standardize it, and probably when MAS helped setup this new TDSR framework, they already took a survey of existing loan applicants, and found that some 95% of applicants satisfy the new TDSR framework, and only then they can launch the new framework.


    Quote Originally Posted by 狮子王
    I second that. Good call
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by economist
    To know the real impact of this measure, one must know the existing bank policies and usual practices when they give out housing loans.
    If banks have already been adhering to similarly strict policies or practices, say they use medium rate of 3% (slightly less than this time round's 3.5%) to calculate TDSR, then the impact would be minimal.
    If banks have been too lax before, then there will be some impact.

    We need forumers who just took loans in recent years and who have been able to understand how banks assess his TDSR and his eligibility, to contribute here, in order to gauge the impact. This is how a forum can really help.

  28. #178
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    This CM will cool the market a bit but the real demand will still be there.

    Hmmm ... Not sure if policy makers did see our posts here? Remember some weeks back we were talking abt what is happening the showflats with youngsters buying condos like a Prada bag (parents pay)?

    Think maybe policy makers saw such posts??!!

    Maybe from now on should refrain from posting real time happenings in the showflats!!

    Anyway... 60% is a joke la ... I can't reveal what is the joke ... U all have to figure it out here...

    No wonder my Mentor writes in codes... Now I understand ... To avoid detection by some policy makers...

    DKSG

  29. #179
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    My personal feel is that it doesn't differ much from the current practice. Why? this is because MAS has been talking with banks since a few months ago, and MAS, as a regulator, wouldn't want to kill banks' business, MAS couldn't even afford the new loans to show year-on-year declines.

    I'm not sure about the current practice as banks never question me when I took loans, however, my guess is that they didn't have a standardized framework to assess TDSR for all loans using 3.5%, what banks did were perhaps only looking at individual mortgage loans, applying a rate like 2.5% or 3%, they probably applied some haircuts to rental too, and banks are no-idiot, while they have been loose in the above, they probably applied a stricter and lower ratio for this individual mortgage service ratio, probably in the region of 40% to 50%. What MAS did was really to standardize it, and probably when MAS helped setup this new TDSR framework, they already took a survey of existing loan applicants, and found that some 95% of applicants satisfy the new TDSR framework, and only then they can launch the new framework.



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by economist
    To know the real impact of this measure, one must know the existing bank policies and usual practices when they give out housing loans.
    If banks have already been adhering to similarly strict policies or practices, say they use medium rate of 3% (slightly less than this time round's 3.5%) to calculate TDSR, then the impact would be minimal.
    If banks have been too lax before, then there will be some impact.

    We need forumers who just took loans in recent years and who have been able to understand how banks assess his TDSR and his eligibility, to contribute here, in order to gauge the impact. This is how a forum can really help.
    I have to say u r a very good thinker. It is very logical to think of it like you do

  30. #180
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DKSG
    This CM will cool the market a bit but the real demand will still be there.

    Hmmm ... Not sure if policy makers did see our posts here? Remember some weeks back we were talking abt what is happening the showflats with youngsters buying condos like a Prada bag (parents pay)?

    Think maybe policy makers saw such posts??!!

    Maybe from now on should refrain from posting real time happenings in the showflats!!

    Anyway............

    DKSG
    Good brother buay koon like me ARH ? ( cannot sleep after the latest news)

Similar Threads

  1. More Cooling Measures
    By Ringo33 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 210
    -: 18-01-13, 11:08
  2. 'Let cooling measures run their course'
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 03-12-12, 18:12
  3. New Cooling Measures
    By Ringo33 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 290
    -: 20-05-12, 13:48
  4. More cooling measures 'likely'
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 64
    -: 09-04-12, 09:40
  5. Possible Cooling Measures???
    By Condo Kaiser in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 61
    -: 28-02-11, 23:11

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •