Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Lawyer should have been clear about fees

  1. #1
    mr funny is offline Any complaints please PM me
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Default Lawyer should have been clear about fees

    July 3, 2007

    Lawyer should have been clear about fees

    WHEN my son's estate was ready for en bloc sale, the appointed sales committee engaged a property agent to market the property and a lawyer to represent the owners in the documentation. However, this lawyer adopted a 'didn't ask, don't mention' attitude while vetting the contract that the owners had to sign with the property agent.

    As a result, the contract was worded in favour of the agent, e.g., the agency fee was pegged at 5 per cent of the reserve price and any price above the reserve price would incur a fee of 6 per cent. Laymen would assume that the commission would be calculated at 5 per cent up to the reserve price and the balance thereafter at 6 per cent.

    As the sale was concluded above the reserve price, the agent charged the owners 6 per cent of the total sale proceeds. When they approached the lawyer for advice, he confirmed that it was correct. Why didn't the lawyer explain it clearly in the first place?

    Then the lawyer quoted a fee of 2 per cent on the sale proceeds and an additional charge for bank redemption. The quotation for the additional charge was not included in the documentation and subsequently the bill consisted of a charge for handling the bank redemption, $X, and a charge to the lending bank for handling the case, $Y (which the bank claimed back from my son.)

    When he queried the lawyer about the four separate charges (including the CPF Board's lawyer's fee), he claimed that they were standard charges and the fees were based on a scale.

    Why do we have to engage a lawyer to redeem a mortgage loan? Would not the CPF lawyer be sufficient? Why was there a double charge - imposed on the borrower as well as the lending bank - when the lawyer handled the same document?

    Elaine Tong Siew Lam (Mdm)

  2. #2
    Factual Guest

    Default Re: Lawyer should have been clear about fees

    Yes, lawyers, in en-bloc sale, collect money from the owners but do not look after the interest of owners.
    This has happened in many en-bloc process where they draft CSA to the disavantage of owners.

Similar Threads

  1. Unlock CPF, needs to engage and pay lawyer fees?
    By pod in forum Finance and Legal
    Replies: 33
    -: 29-01-14, 01:55
  2. Lawyer and Valuation fees
    By taeyeon in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 25-07-13, 09:50
  3. Disbursement of loan by lawyer
    By buttercarp in forum Finance and Legal
    Replies: 7
    -: 02-08-11, 14:42
  4. What does the Conveyancing Lawyer do for you?
    By Inagaki in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 4
    -: 22-03-11, 17:08
  5. Looking for conveyancing lawyer
    By Newbie Homebuyer in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 21-08-08, 11:17

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts