Don't hate me because I'm a foreigner

[eng81157]

again u selective quote. thats 27% of the economy.

so what about the 27%?! my statement is consistent with that of MTI's - manufacturing is a pillar of the singapore economy.

i gather you don't read too much of BT or ST - Singapore's quarterly GDP performance hinges heavily on biomed production

[eng81157]

wat a dumb ass. u think we can develop these stuff without foreign contractors? anyway shall not say more on this as u are such stupid brain cannot understand.

WAHAHAHAHA!! i already told u i was in the organization and u, who are an outsider, went to argue otherwise.

go take a hike lah

[minority]

p.s. if you have not realized, i've already dug a hole for you to sink into since the start of the thread.

one thing i just realized. i luv digging holes! Should be one of ur forte. Start digging dude. the other dumber will sure luv it. and return u dumb ass a favor.!





Happy digging.. just remember to wash hand.

[minority]

WAHAHAHAHA!! i already told u i was in the organization and u, who are an outsider, went to argue otherwise.

go take a hike lah

really ! I too! which part are u? the toilet unit?

[eng81157]

really ! I too! which part are u? the toilet unit?

WAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! u?? doing weapons R&D with your intellect???!???!!!
WAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

trying to develop a new form of paper bullet??! WAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[minority]

WAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! u?? doing weapons R&D with your intellect???!???!!!
WAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

trying to develop a new form of paper bullet??! WAHAHAHAHAHAHA

wahhh u expert right? use toilet paper during ur spare time to make right? and throw some shit into the mix too!

solid!


Now I understand ur hole digging experience!

[westman]

i think he is spewing hatred without thinking twice. hence, the need to rubbish him or else, everyone here will be painted as xenophobic anti-patriots of singapore.

to be honest, i was itching for an intellectual sparring but now i'm having fun poking holes in his nonsensical arguments and tearing them apart

Bro.. you go ahead to engage him.. I need to work to pay for my housing dent. no time for him.. can only afford to KPKB at night or early morning...

[westman]

wahhh u expert right? use toilet paper during ur spare time to make right? and throw some shit into the mix too!

solid!


Now I understand ur hole digging experience!

Ooi.. how much your master pay you for each posting? R U IB?

[minority]

Ooi.. how much your master pay you for each posting? R U IB?

eng is dumb u are dumber. wat a pair! or u are his dog? u like digging too? woof woof.

[eng81157]

eng is dumb u are dumber. wat a pair! or u are his dog? u like digging too? woof woof.

doesn't matter what i am as long as i can spell better, process logic and possess higher intellect than you

[minority]

doesn't matter what i am as long as i can spell better, process logic and possess higher intellect than you

Logic? hah hah and intellect? LOL u must be kidding urself.

u forgot a good Axx digger too?

[westman]

eng is dumb u are dumber. wat a pair! or u are his dog? u like digging too? woof woof.

Huh? I don't understand dog language...
You damn xia suay. Shoo shoo.. go back to suck up your master's balls...

[eng81157]

Huh? I don't understand dog language...
You damn xia suay. Shoo shoo.. go back to suck up your master's balls...

eh, don't descend to his level of - "you're good, i'm better" "you're better, i'm the best"

it only goes to show his level of maturity and intellect or to be correct, the lack of which.

[westman]

eh, don't descend to his level of - "you're good, i'm better" "you're better, i'm the best"

it only goes to show his level of maturity and intellect or to be correct, the lack of which.

Oops. My bad.

Sorry, Minority.. paiseh..

[Regulators]

his famous theory is capitalism leading to socialism...my toes are still laughing now

eh, don't descend to his level of - "you're good, i'm better" "you're better, i'm the best"

it only goes to show his level of maturity and intellect or to be correct, the lack of which.

[minority]

wat a bunch of looser.

[eng81157]

wat a bunch of looser.

WAHAHAHAHAHA, can't even spell it right "L-O-O-S-E-R"

[minority]

WAHAHAHAHAHA, can't even spell it right "L-O-O-S-E-R"

why not loooooseeerrrsssss !

for u should be looseerss coz after digging each other loose. get it! wat a dumb ass.. oops should be loose ass right!

[hopeful]

his famous theory is capitalism leading to socialism...my toes are still laughing now

wasn't it phillip yeo who say if you want to be socialist, you have to be a capitalist first?

[minority]

wasn't it phillip yeo who say if you want to be socialist, you have to be a capitalist first?

Aiayh dont bother correct them lah.. they like to twist n turn mah. and dig each other ass.

[Regulators]

these are two totally different systems. how can Singapore, a capitalist country evolve into a socialist country? just doesn't make sense.

wasn't it phillip yeo who say if you want to be socialist, you have to be a capitalist first?

[eng81157]

Aiayh dont bother correct them lah.. they like to twist n turn mah. and dig each other ass.

WAHAHAHA, u were the one who was befuddled by the two concepts. go check what you posted, rather than just making brainless statements

[eng81157]

you need money to fund social programs, but that doesn't make you a socialist. in today's context, there are hardly any pure capitalist or socialist systems - maybe cuba or venezuela.

look at china, it's communist country in a political sense, but it's economy is market driven.

[minority]

WAHAHAHA, u were the one who was befuddled by the two concepts. go check what you posted, rather than just making brainless statements

U are the dumb 1 that cannot understand due to the lack of grey matter between yr ears.

Shoo shoo go chew on ur bone at one corner n don't bark here bark there.

[minority]

you need money to fund social programs, but that doesn't make you a socialist. in today's context, there are hardly any pure capitalist or socialist systems - maybe cuba or venezuela.

look at china, it's communist country in a political sense, but it's economy is market driven.

Tock cock sing song. End up say n don't say no ass diff.

[august]

Come in check out the angry one.

[eng81157]

Come in check out the angry one.

i think u mean the angry (and stupid, and illogical, and moronic, and blah blah blah) one

[minority]

i think u mean the angry (and stupid, and illogical, and moronic, and blah blah blah) one

wow u finally realized how did you find out urself? finally looked into the mirror or ur own pool of pee?

let me also help add some other traits to u have incase u missed it ie.e brainless, frustrated and angry xenophobia and plus luv to cluster together with ur gangs of dumb n dumber ?

[eng81157]

WAHAHAHA, now even SPH's reporter delivers a slap on mr airhead.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glad to see that Saturday’s column (‘Zero tolerance for intolerance’) has continued the ongoing discussion on xenophobia, and I thank everyone for giving their two cents’ worth. In response to a few things being circulated online, I thought I should make clear some points:

1. Just because I say that xenophobes like to be known as pro-Singaporeans, it doesn’t mean that all pro-Singaporeans are xenophobes. That’s a very important difference.

2. Some have compared Saturday’s column to an earlier Singapolitics piece I wrote about the online reaction to Amy Cheong. I hope people have taken the time to read the two pieces and not just the headlines. Fundamentally their messages are different, yet linked. Broadly speaking, Saturday’s column argues we should stand up to discrimination, while the Singapolitics piece talks about the way and manner we should go about doing that pushback.

3. Some have also said that Saturday’s column makes it sound like I am only blaming people for xenophobia, and not so much the Government. Firstly, that isn’t true, because the column talks about how the population White Paper stoked anxieties, and how our political leaders appear to have ceased their talk about integration. Secondly, there have been other pieces, both online and in the mainstream media, that have already pointed out how their liberal immigration policy and lack of intragovernment coordination has resulted in many problems and much unhappiness, and it’s something the Government has recognised and is attempting to rectify. How well those attempts are going can be the subject of other columns (and rightly so). But the point I was interested in making is that as active citizens, we should take responsibility for our actions. We are perfectly justified to be unhappy, but that unhappiness should not translate to hatred towards foreigners. We take responsibility by venting the unhappiness at the right way, and we take responsibility by telling those who do it the wrong way to stop it, as civilly as we can (see point 2, and the Singapolitics piece).
.
Tessa Wong
SPH Journalist


http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/04/03...st-xenophobia/

[minority]

WAHAHAHA, now even SPH's reporter delivers a slap on mr airhead.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glad to see that Saturday’s column (‘Zero tolerance for intolerance’) has continued the ongoing discussion on xenophobia, and I thank everyone for giving their two cents’ worth. In response to a few things being circulated online, I thought I should make clear some points:

1. Just because I say that xenophobes like to be known as pro-Singaporeans, it doesn’t mean that all pro-Singaporeans are xenophobes. That’s a very important difference.

2. Some have compared Saturday’s column to an earlier Singapolitics piece I wrote about the online reaction to Amy Cheong. I hope people have taken the time to read the two pieces and not just the headlines. Fundamentally their messages are different, yet linked. Broadly speaking, Saturday’s column argues we should stand up to discrimination, while the Singapolitics piece talks about the way and manner we should go about doing that pushback.

3. Some have also said that Saturday’s column makes it sound like I am only blaming people for xenophobia, and not so much the Government. Firstly, that isn’t true, because the column talks about how the population White Paper stoked anxieties, and how our political leaders appear to have ceased their talk about integration. Secondly, there have been other pieces, both online and in the mainstream media, that have already pointed out how their liberal immigration policy and lack of intragovernment coordination has resulted in many problems and much unhappiness, and it’s something the Government has recognised and is attempting to rectify. How well those attempts are going can be the subject of other columns (and rightly so). But the point I was interested in making is that as active citizens, we should take responsibility for our actions. We are perfectly justified to be unhappy, but that unhappiness should not translate to hatred towards foreigners. We take responsibility by venting the unhappiness at the right way, and we take responsibility by telling those who do it the wrong way to stop it, as civilly as we can (see point 2, and the Singapolitics piece).
.
Tessa Wong
SPH Journalist


http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/04/03...st-xenophobia/

but u! u are XENOPHOBIC . Don try to change topic prata man.