Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Not just a numbers game

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default Not just a numbers game

    PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 18, 2013
    THIS WEEK'S TOPIC
    Not just a numbers game
    What key messages and insights can we take from the ongoing debate on the Population White Paper? What are the areas most in need of urgent action, and what specific actions/policies do you hope to see implemented?

    - PHOTO: AFP
    Ho Meng Kit
    CEO
    Singapore Business Federation
    FOR businesses, the key insight is that the path to the future will be completely different from the path taken in the last 30 years. The future path will require businesses to develop Singaporeans as their core workforce, be less reliant on foreign manpower and to put a much greater emphasis on productivity and innovation to drive operational excellence to create value. The most important task is to get this message of economic restructuring to all companies. The short transition time makes this particularly urgent for our small companies. I urge companies to make these changes now when Asia is still growing and the competition from the region is less strong. I hope to see a paradigm shift in the government's efforts to develop small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as the co-drivers of growth for our economy. The debate has exposed a xenophobic dimension among many Singaporeans. Multinational corporations (MNCs) in Singapore are concerned enough to raise this publicly. This must be addressed to avoid damaging our reputation as an open and competitive city where businesses can bring good investments and jobs for Singaporeans.
    Patrick Liew
    CEO
    HSR Global Ltd
    MY concern is that many people have been overly focused on the planning parameter of 6.9 million and not paying closer attention to questioning and challenging the assumptions supporting it. For example, it is not just the number of people that will help us improve the quality of life but also whether we can improve our economic, social and environmental infrastructure and programmes to support the overall well-being of our people. The outcomes should be addressed on a holistic basis and should include improving happiness levels, social well-being, work-life balance, and life satisfaction. We should not only work on improving productivity but also on how we can create and develop higher value-added industries and enterprises, innovate and export future technologies and services, develop game-changing business architectures, and become market-makers rather than market-takers in order to strengthen our economic growth.
    To do so, we need to start improving our educational systems to produce the next generation of professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) and also human resource policies to attract, develop and retain not just the appropriate quantity but also the quality of foreign talents. Instead of taking a town planner's top-down approach to housing higher densities of population, we need to actively find out residents' real and perceived concerns and respond to them in the most palatable way. It bodes well to remember that whatever motion that has been passed in Parliament, currently and in the future, will not work if there is no strong buy-in and support from the people. We need to improve our ways of communicating policies and harnessing talents, energies and contributions of the people so as to promote and execute policies effectively and achieve positive and sustainable results.
    Liu Chunlin
    CEO
    K&C Protective Technologies Pte Ltd
    IF the Population White Paper (PWP) was set out to get the participation of our society, then it certainly has accomplished its goal. Incidentally, the publishing of the PWP has also increased the level of transparency of the decision-making process of our government and that alone is a great achievement. Nonetheless, we can still learn a lesson from this case about communication breakdown. The public in general didn't get the message that the proposed population for 2030 was not meant to be a target but simply a benchmark to measure how well-prepared our infrastructure would be by then. Any misunderstanding of a similar nature should be avoided in the future.
    After all, the most important issue to be addressed is that a nation needs sufficient population growth for its economy to progress. Without fresh blood, an ageing nation will not be able to provide sufficient care to their elderly. We are fortunate to have a government that is willing to engage its people in the participation of decision-making process. With this increased transparency, it will definitely have the support of the majority, if not all, of its people.
    David Leong
    Managing Director
    PeopleWorldwide Consulting Pte Ltd
    WITH slower growth and a diminishing and ageing population, it is almost a death knell for a resource-less Singapore if the government does not realistically deal with the population issue in the White Paper. Whether it is organic growth of the Singaporean core or through immigration substitution, we must have a build-up and replacement strategy to sustain the vitality and vibrancy of our country. Otherwise, we are likely to die young as a country with an aged population.
    In the geopolitical part of the equation, Singapore is weak with the lack of resources. Not enough land, not enough Singaporeans, not enough workers, not enough of many things. Apart from the strengths of our strategic location and having built a trusted brand name, these things will not last without the vibrancy of people. We need to attract flows through Singapore and people attraction is one of them. Positioned as a strong transport and financial hub, Singapore needs to have the constant flow of people, capital, goods and services and without the volume of throughput, Singapore will be seriously disadvantaged.
    Singapore works, not by accident, but by the planning and execution efforts of the government. I hope when the government sets its policies on the inflow of people, it should not be reactionary but based on the strength of its belief that this is one core reason for the sustainability of our economy. I agree we cannot be on the same growth trajectory for manpower as the ballooning effect causes strains. We cannot grow at all costs but to purposely shift to a lower gear for lower growth can be detrimental and irreversible. Growth in the economy is really not at the disposal of the government to control. It is easy to run an economy aground like many developed countries but to build growth is not easy. We cannot take our growth in Singapore for granted. We have to be realistic about this.
    This time, the government is doing it right - planning and building capacities for 2030. The question is not 5.8 million, 6.5 million or 6.9 million. The numbers have no magic. The magic is in the execution of the plan. Let's hope we can outdo ourselves again and build a better Singapore by 2030.
    Tan Tiong Cheng
    Chairman
    Knight Frank Pte Ltd
    PUBLIC reactions to the government's population policy have contributed little to what is essentially a well-meaning document. The policy has invoked a lively debate, ranging from the fear of overcrowding, to the dilution of Singapore's identity to Ponzi demography. With the rising cost of living and immigration as hot-button issues, the top-end planning parameter of 6.9 million population in the next 17 years has no doubt evoked great concern among the citizenry.
    Despite the White Paper's emphasis of an ageing population with falling birth rates, the question is whether 6.9 million - with almost half foreigners - is really necessary for Singapore given our land constraints and the declining proportion of the Singaporean core. The Paper touched on the need to have a complementary workforce of Singaporeans and foreigners to create a dynamic economy, which I think is important in order to ensure Singapore's relevance in the global stage and indeed our long-term survival.
    The economic and demographic challenges are increasingly real, so it is timely for us to debate and think of ways to solve these issues. Following this Paper, there is an urgent need for the government to design a sustainable economic model with comprehensive strategies that can address the rationale for a larger population. This should include a long-term plan to provide employment opportunities for Singaporeans, against the backdrop of economic growth rates at sustainable levels.
    Growing a young population rooted in Singapore should be given top priority so as to strengthen our Singaporean identity. So, a more innovative and encompassing scheme to promote family building and to improve our birth rates ought to be implemented with exigency, rather than what appears to be the easier solution of bringing in more foreigners. I believe the government can do better in this area and in so doing may find the consensus it needs.
    Harish Nim
    Chief Executive
    Emerio Corporation Pte Ltd
    SINGAPORE needs foreign talent for growth and prosperity of the nation. This is a fact. Singapore by itself will find it very hard to succeed in the future if we have to depend upon our indigenous workforce.
    The government ought to do more to distribute the country's wealth, in meaningful ways, to its citizens so that we are not left behind to struggle while the nation progresses. There is no joy in being one of the richest nations in the world and still expect our seniors and elderly folk to work in order to support themselves. They have contributed all they could meaningfully to our country.
    Our ministers in charge of urban development, namely transport and housing, need to admit their failure to the people in their duty to ensure that the influx of foreigners lagged behind the infrastructure that needed to be in place prior to the population increase. They need to promise us that the population growth will trail the infrastructure growth and when the population reaches 6.9 million, we will be better off.
    The People's Action Party (PAP) is the only party in my mind that can steer Singapore to greater heights, but they need to show very clearly that they care for its citizens in ways that cannot be questioned by the fledgling opposition members. My request to the PAP is to deal with all issues with equal amounts of intelligence quotient (IQ) and emotional quotient (EQ). Using either one will not work.
    I am shocked at some of the suggestions the opposition has made and these comments lead me to believe that they do not know the ABC of how to plan for a country's future. While I am not against housewives and seniors rejoining the workforce, I doubt if even the opposition thinks that these people can run global banks or complex IT systems or MNCs.
    Philippe HJ Huinck
    Regional Managing Director, South and South East Asia
    International SOS
    FOR me, the Population White Paper raises broader questions around the impact of a growing population - foreign or local - on our healthcare infrastructure. As the Singaporean population increases, so does the need for increased healthcare - public and private.
    Singapore is renowned for its efficient and widespread system of healthcare, and I am certain the government will continue to prioritise this sector as we move forward, both to accommodate the already ageing population, as well as the results of encouraging more Singaporeans to marry and have children, supplemented by an adjusted pace of immigration to prevent the citizen population from shrinking. Many Singaporeans already have supplemental private health insurance, often provided by employers, for services not covered by the government's programme and this will play an increasingly important role as demands on the healthcare system increase. Proficient universal healthcare will be fundamental to the government's vision of ''a sustainable population for a dynamic Singapore''.
    Lim Soon Hock
    Managing Director
    PLAN-B ICAG Pte Ltd
    THERE was a clear divide between government and businesses and people on the issues of population, growth, total fertility rate (TFR), workforce and foreigners. Businesses and people wanted short-term issues to be solved before addressing the longer-term challenges of our population.
    A major issue is the increased dependency on foreigners to solve our population challenges and the concomitant declining indigenous workforce. People are not objecting to the inflow of low-skilled workers such as those from the construction, hospitality, and food and beverage industries as well as maids, as these are jobs which Singaporeans shun. The government should not belabour this point, but instead should focus more on helping PMETs compete, going forward.
    PMETs will face a greater threat of competition from foreigners, as they now do, because businesses find the latter more affordable, for the same skill and expertise, if not better in many instances. I think this group, which is planned to be at least 55 per cent of the workforce, will want to know how the government can help them compete, not on salary or costs, but through other means.
    I think more can also be done to promote and increase TFR. People are seeing actions taken by the government falling short of the rhetoric. The recent Marriage and Parenthood Package, taken as a whole, was more parenthood-centric than marriage-centric. It does not address fully the issue of rising singlehood. It is this tentative step that is being taken rather than going all out to solve the TFR problem that is at the heart of unhappiness and disappointment of the people and businesses. We are at an inflexion point. The government therefore ought to demonstrate more seriousness in wanting to tackle the declining TFR. The government should only resort to complementing our population with more foreigners as a contingency. The government did the right thing to clarify. Unfortunately, the White Paper inadvertently left an unfavourable impression on businesses and people that past planning had not been up to par; it was under-planning, if not bad planning, so businesses and people have good reasons to doubt the efficacy and intended outcomes of the plans contained in the White Paper.
    Han Fook Kwang, the managing editor (English and Malay Newspaper Division) of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), was right to point out in a recent article that the government has much to do to restore the trust of the people and businesses. I agree with him wholeheartedly. Because the issues are of such great import, it is vital that the government taps the collective wisdom of as many key stakeholders as possible, not limited to chambers of commerce, WP, NMPs, etc. Partisan politics should be set aside. A diversity of views will not only help to shape and refine policies and initiatives, but in the current circumstances, will go a long way to regaining the trust people and other key stakeholders have in the government.
    Lynne Ng
    Regional Director, Adecco SEA
    Adecco Personnel Pte Ltd
    THE intense public discussion on the Population White Paper has served as a reminder that this is a very important area for both locals and foreigners. The opinions expressed by many show that Singaporeans and other residents take very seriously the direction that our country is heading, from both its population size going forward, as well as the structure and composition of the workforce. Areas which require urgent action include an understanding of how we benefit from foreign talent in many areas of commerce and industry and ensuring that as a country we have the balance of local and foreign talent required to ensure our continued competitiveness. How we plan for our workforce of the future is an area of great importance.
    Ray Ferguson
    CEO, Singapore
    Standard Chartered Bank
    IN the short term, maintaining a delicate balance between developing a core pool of Singapore talent and integrating existing non-Singaporean employees is key. At Standard Chartered, while our diverse workforce gives us global perspectives and insights, building a Singaporean core is absolutely an integral part of our talent strategy. We believe in grooming a sustainable pipeline of local talent and we place great emphasis on the training and development of our people. Each year, we actively recruit from local universities and have an excellent management trainee programme which gives our trainees exposure to different business areas as well as international work experience.
    In integrating non-Singaporeans, employee volunteering is the most direct way to help newcomers understand and interact with locals while helping the community. The bank has built a robust employee volunteering programme including three days of paid leave for volunteering activities; a one-hour interactive online cultural awareness training resource and the ''International Network'', where foreigners can learn first-hand about the country from local employees. In the long term, we believe that companies can do more to create a pro-family environment and help to boost the total fertility rate in Singapore.
    Standard Chartered has introduced a number of flexible working arrangements - from flexi-time, part-time to working from home - to help employees with the pressing challenge of balancing work and personal commitments. We offer employees leave ranging from two days to 16 weeks for marriage, family care, childcare, paternity, maternity and adoption purposes. Currently we already provide adoption leave of 16 weeks for our staff. Employees who wish to take a longer break can take sabbatical leave for three to 12 months for reasons including pursuing family responsibilities. We also provide an online resource centre for expectant mothers and managers of those going on maternity leave; and nursing rooms at our Changi Business Park and Marina Bay offices for the use of mothers who return to work.
    Zaheer Merchant
    Regional Director (Singapore and Europe)
    QI Group of Companies
    ONE insight is evidently the widening rift between policymakers and the people, with polarised views as a consequence of the Population White Paper. This resulted in concessions as to its ''presentation'' needing to be better. Singaporeans cite increased competition for jobs, housing shortages, traffic jams or social tension as reasons against the Paper, aside from the debate whether we are at core, truly ''Singaporean''. Singapore's net density is lower than Hong Kong, New York and London. Analysts project it is possible to house 6.9 million people with smart urban planning, as detailed in the Land Use Plan released by URA to mitigate overcrowding.
    The message of concern leading to need for action will be on policies touching on infrastructure, transport, housing, education, health, cost and quality of life. These should not suffer and must be better than adequate to serve Singapore's ''growing'' population. The government needs to enhance Singaporeans' sense of security in every form and encourage social cohesion and integration. Gentler public engagement rather than a parochial top-down approach is required. Clarity on migrants that the government is attracting will be helpful, including to businesses affected by tighter inflows of foreign labour. Ultimately Singaporeans want to see a Singapore for all Singaporeans first perhaps, as opposed to a Singapore free-for-all.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Andrea Ross
    Managing Director (Singapore and Malaysia)
    Robert Walters Singapore
    IN the path of Singapore's Population White Paper, the one figure earmarked for heated debate over the following week was the projected 6.9 million Singapore residents in 2030. Whether that fact pans out in the future is still uncertain. However, more importantly, we should examine the infrastructure which needs to be put in place to support the population growth. As a country with no natural resources, this means working even harder to keep up excellent relations with our external suppliers. Our public transport system has to be further strengthened to run at optimal efficiency at all times. Additionally, with space already being a constraint in present times, the issue of housing will need to be addressed now in order to plan for the future.
    Steve Melhuish
    Co-Founder and Group Chief Executive Officer
    PropertyGuru
    WHILE the premise of the Population White Paper promises to create high-value jobs and careers that allow for affordable housing and comfortable lifestyles, it will feed the already competitive Singaporean environment. For instance, it would take more than the enhanced Marriage and Parenthood package for Singaporeans to have more children. Work-life balance, living costs and expense affordability as well as the quality of Singapore's education system are more influential factors married couples consider in, or not to, build a family unit. The Population White Paper may have an opposite effect of more Singaporeans not wanting children or having less children in order to attain and maintain a materially preferable lifestyle. This will result in direct, continual increases of foreigners or foreigners converted to Permanent Residents to provide for a recurring pool of foreign workers.
    For employers requiring foreign workers with basic education and blue-collar skills, this translates immediately to defrayed employment costs as the hiring of these foreign workers command a lower salary rate. For high technological industries looking to hire individuals with specific technological know-how, a strong innovative suit and company leaders with strong management academia, attracting ''quality foreigners'' is key to success. Having said which, Singapore-based companies are built on the spirit of entrepreneurship so the significance of having Singaporeans instead of foreigners in PMET jobs to generate and nurture new and cutting-edge ideas makes a lot more sense to retain the economically attractive Singapore brand.
    Thirumalai Chandroo
    Chairman/CEO
    Modern Montessori International Group
    THE prevalence of foreigners in Singapore has caused disruption among many Singaporeans, spearheading the reflection of the space occupied, jobs undertaken and inflated prices of property. In spite of the measures embarked to accommodate the population growth and maintain a high-quality environment, concerns about immigration rules for foreigners were debated, which clearly stresses the constraints of Singaporeans in welcoming foreigners. However, since the call is about population growth, the focus should be on improving the lifestyle of Singaporeans, with more balance at work and affordable access to housing easing marriage and parenting and, ultimately, leading to an increase in the birth rate. Initiatives to support shared responsibility in raising children and defraying its cost should be given a thought.
    Sean Tan
    General Manager
    iProperty.com Singapore
    THE White Paper on population addresses a myriad of issues. However, one area of urgent action would be to ensure that housing remains affordable for Singaporeans across all segments. There is no doubt that the government and the Housing Development Board (HDB) are doing their best to provide affordable housing for first-time buyers and new families.
    The question is, what happens beyond that? With our current population size of 5.31 million, many people in Singapore already feel that property prices here are too high. From our recent iProperty.com Asia Property Market Sentiment Survey, 64 per cent of respondents believe that the resale prices of HDB flats are not affordable for the average Singapore family. In addition, 67 per cent wanted the government to take more active steps to cool the market.
    The results seem to suggest that it may not be enough to just help families own their first property and the government should look at issues beyond that - such as helping Singaporeans upgrade to bigger flats. While some may feel that it is not the government's job to help Singaporeans upgrade and own bigger flats, I believe there are merits to look into it as it boils down to providing our people with a better quality of life.
    And to me, the concern over ensuring a good quality of life with a population of 6.9 million is the crux behind the pushback we saw during the Population White Paper debate. More Singaporeans would support the government's population policy if it was clearly communicated how a bigger population could improve the life of the man on the street, and there are concrete measures that would address potential challenges like transport congestion, high certificate of entitlement (COE) prices, and high property prices.
    Yeoh Oon Jin
    Executive Chairman
    PwC Singapore
    THE current debate on the Population White Paper stems from the ongoing infrastructural challenges that Singapore faces in key areas such as housing and transportation. It is commendable that the government has revealed plans to build 200,000 new homes by 2016 and to double the current MRT network to cover most parts of Singapore by 2030. However, these plans will take time to implement. The sooner such infrastructure development takes place, the greater the level of public confidence that the population growth can be well-managed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    70

    Default

    You are starting to behave like Mr B, constantly posting articles to further only your agenda. I am curious about your occupation and how many/what types of properties do you own.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    These are full articles from which I do not edit or snip out like Mr B to twist the article content. They are all posted in full with dates and authors.

    You are left to judge the content fully at your own reading. so dont jump up and down becoz you feel the article is not something you like or dont like.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by windcar
    You are starting to behave like Mr B, constantly posting articles to further only your agenda. I am curious about your occupation and how many/what types of properties do you own.

    So if I tell u I own 100s of property will it make u jump with anger?

    Or I tell you I am the lower middle class working a blue collar job will it make you jump in glee?

    What do that have to do with a article u read and u judge yourself?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by windcar
    You are starting to behave like Mr B, constantly posting articles to further only your agenda. I am curious about your occupation and how many/what types of properties do you own.

    This is a forum.

    What is wrong with his/her posting?

    Btw, he/she already indicated he/she is a "minority"... so if he/she is posting views that are different or against yours, it is his/her right!

    Dont stress...
    Just my 0.005c!




Similar Threads

  1. Let's Game......
    By Laguna in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 22
    -: 01-08-13, 22:35
  2. House Numbers ??
    By Santro in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 87
    -: 29-09-11, 08:31
  3. Let's take a closer look at the numbers
    By mr funny in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 19
    -: 13-07-11, 21:51
  4. PR numbers nearly double
    By vboy in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 11
    -: 09-09-10, 08:21
  5. What do HDB numbers say?
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 27-10-09, 01:49

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •