Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Residential property buys via SPV may not escape ABSD

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    10,829

    Default Residential property buys via SPV may not escape ABSD

    http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/arch...-absd-20130126

    Published January 26, 2013

    Residential property buys via SPV may not escape ABSD

    Special purpose vehicle arrangements may be disregarded, says IRAS

    By Felda Chay


    CORPORATE entities seeking to avoid paying the additional buyers' stamp duty (ABSD) by buying shares in special purpose vehicles that own properties could come under the scrutiny of the tax authorities.

    The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS), in a letter responding to a Business Times article on such deals, said: "When the company buys a residential property, it will be subject to ABSD, and at the highest ABSD rate of 15 per cent. Under the Stamp Duties Act, the Commissioner of Stamp Duties may disregard or vary any arrangement to counteract any reduction in or avoidance of duty payable by that person.

    "The Inland Revenue of Authority of Singapore audits stamp duty transactions to detect transactions that are conducted for tax avoidance purposes."

    Transaction of real estate through SPVs is not a new phenomenon; funds in particular are known to do it. But the government's latest move to raise the ABSD to a hefty 15 per cent from 10 per cent for corporate entities has made it more attractive for companies to consider this route.

    This is because the ABSD applies only when investors buy the units of a development directly, but it does not apply when the transaction is through the sale of shares in companies - even if they own real estate.

    Experts had said therefore that this would be especially attractive for corporate entities, especially those looking to purchase luxury residential property.

    On Tuesday, Savills placed an ad in BT for the sale of 36 units at Goodwood Residence through an SPV that owns the apartments. Then on Wednesday, Jones Lang LaSalle put on the market 21 Anderson, Royal Oak Residence, with a similar arrangement as one of the available purchase options.

    JLL said: "Whilst the vendor is selling the asset, potential investors may also consider acquiring shares in the company that owns the property, thereby realising Additional Buyers' Stamp Duty (ABSD) savings."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    no escape man. they will press every loophole.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    no leh. i think its not easy to catch the buyers of SPV. any way for IRAS to track them down?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    When will my Mt sinai property be corrected?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    no leh. i think its not easy to catch the buyers of SPV. any way for IRAS to track them down?
    force all developers to declare their SPVs and any change in ownership. those who are found non compliant will be fine x times over the ABSD in question.

    those assets must be held under some vehicle or entity. so from there you trace.

    where there is a will there is a way...

    oops, maybe I gave them too many ideas liao. haha.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    but the 2 recent advertisements in question (36 units of goodwood residence and the royal oak residence at anderson road) are put up for sale by previously incorporated SPVs which are not by developers. the goodwood residence one should be the kuwaiti fund which was trapped after buying from guocoland after the 2007 peak.

    http://business.asiaone.com/Business...702-74119.html

    kuwaitis bot at 2800psf. some rich local, please bid 2240psf to end their misery.

    i am sure there are those smart pple who have just 1 or 2 ppties in each SPV which they can sell. how to track?!



    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    force all developers to declare their SPVs and any change in ownership. those who are found non compliant will be fine x times over the ABSD in question.

    those assets must be held under some vehicle or entity. so from there you trace.

    where there is a will there is a way...

    oops, maybe I gave them too many ideas liao. haha.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    those already gone into SPV cannot be tracked. those that haven't gone into SPV still can track lor. anyway, we don't have a habit of going retrospective.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    yup. that's what i meant. i m sure a lot of smart pple own a lot of ppties in SPVs already.

    and u r right. loophole for new injections into SPVs r now closed.

    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    those already gone into SPV cannot be tracked. those that haven't gone into SPV still can track lor. anyway, we don't have a habit of going retrospective.

Similar Threads

  1. Far East buys 27 residential units in ex-AA Centre
    By reporter2 in forum En Bloc Achieved
    Replies: 0
    -: 30-07-18, 21:51
  2. Singapore still cost competitive for luxury home buys despite ABSD: study
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 03-02-16, 18:45
  3. Don't blame ABSD for overseas property buys
    By reporter2 in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 1
    -: 19-03-15, 20:18
  4. Can giving away ur property escape SSD?
    By price in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 13
    -: 07-03-12, 01:13
  5. Aspial buys another residential site
    By mr funny in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 2
    -: 30-10-09, 18:17

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •