![Quote](images/SultanThemeVB4R/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Doom
To substantiate the earlier points, quotes from an analyst which I just came across:
"Ïn the past, winning an election was straightforward . . . the PAP picked highly educated professionals, ex civil servants, generals – the elite – people that the PAP believed the electorate would look up to. Never mind if he never served in the grassroots, or had any presence in the constituency. If the PAP said he was the elite and the best person for the job, the electorate believed them. Now ‘elite’ is a bad word.
In the past, one would never have imagined that a PAP candidate, a surgeon that the Prime Minister himself promised is destined for higher office, would lose an election to what the older generation would have thought of as a ‘less qualified’ candidate. In the past, one would never have imagined that the Prime Minister could turn up for an election rally, give it his all, and STILL lose the election."