Originally Posted by sgbuyer
Then dont drive loh. in HK , Manhattan or Toyko not many people drive.
Originally Posted by sgbuyer
Then dont drive loh. in HK , Manhattan or Toyko not many people drive.
so people are waking up to the elitist ideology sold by the ruling party to the ppl all these years, which is why an ordinary curtin grad stands out more than an elite surgeon. aren't you happy we had that change since you agree the miw at the top are elitist? why are you then cursing democracy fighters as beggars?Originally Posted by minority
Originally Posted by Regulators
did I say people are beggars? I am only saying u consider the people on the top as being elitist. When this batch of folks get there they will be consider as elitist. So for ur analogy that elitist is bad. then should it be beggars or perceived poor then can be good there?
If you want to feel that way I cant help it. my pt is regardless of the folks background that is not the basis of judgement of their achievement.
Its seem like its so easy today to say oh they elite mah. they better mah. Never occurred those folks also crawled their way up there ? And have to continue to perform to stay there?
I guess the solution for u is socialism all same wear green. But hoot! The guy on top is greener then the rest too.
Originally Posted by leesg123
hows rent collection in malaysia? heard can be troublesome.
anyway KL price all go up a fair bit already. similar to everywhere in asia.
Originally Posted by moneytalk
Its always easy to be the arm chair critic. Come to do real work all have many excuse.
you should look at how the miw mocked at opposition members in the past based on credentials alone, not achievements.
Originally Posted by minority
Originally Posted by joeteo
if u look at the national census
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/popn...ation2012b.pdf
page iv.
if you look at the divorce rate. Assuming that 50% have kids.. that is 3000 parents a yr that need housing of single parent with kid.
So i feel this do address a certain sector of the population needs.
anyway, if we wanna discuss credentials, i believe chen show mao is smarter than LHL. and has better credentials.Originally Posted by Regulators
coz there where no achievement in the first place. Who say climbing up will be easy.? everyone have to fight for it.Originally Posted by Regulators
like all startup. u mean we owe eveyone a chance?
If you have a heart surgery would u give a new green surgeon chance? just becoz u want to help him so give chance?
who will pay?? the same folks who are paying for the billions lost in botched investments made by GIC and Temasek.Originally Posted by minority
nobody is asking to have welfare doled out to anyone in the streets.
I wld prefer the experienced surgeon to do it but no harm having a younger more inexperienced one with sharp eyes to to remind him.Originally Posted by minority
No one is expecting the opposition to run the country today, however, that doesn't mean everyone likes the way the country is run. Ruling with the head and not with your heart is not healthy in the long run.![]()
树大必有枯枝,人多必有白痴。
树无皮必死无疑,人不要脸天下无敌!
the playing field is not level. i doubt you interacted with aspiring medical students or lawyers who were denied an interview with the selection panel in NUS - why? only some positions are opened to general public, while a good number reserved for those with connectionsOriginally Posted by minority
Originally Posted by leftfield
I hope the experience surgeon dont get slap or punched while stitching up ur heart![]()
so, why is the likes of Tin Pei Ling in parliament? you gave her chance to be an MP ah?!Originally Posted by minority
![]()
or did she fight tooth and nail in a one-on-one battle with an opposition candidate?
Since when everything will be level playing field? go buy property also not level playing field.Originally Posted by eng81157
Can get in VIP. But there is VVIP and then there is VVVIP 1st bite.
Tats life. just have to fight harder then.
even in socialism is not level playing field. so why are we expecting everything is level playing field?
the opposition has got to where they are today based on their achievement, not through family relations. I think you should give them credit where they deserveOriginally Posted by minority
Originally Posted by Regulators
Well sell me a better idea then check n insurance. thats last thing I need to hear. Show me policies.
u also have to give the folks who dad set a expectation . its not easy to live in ur dads shadow.
any tom dick or harry can be vip n vvip in new launches, do you not know how property agencies operate?Originally Posted by minority
Originally Posted by Regulators
thats why I say VVVIP. the developers closest friends and business associates.
ya, no level playing field, and yet pap still lost in the by-election lol.Originally Posted by minority
tats life. pap just have to fight harder then.
support the opposition till they have sufficient numbers in parliament to veto motions then they will talk about championing policies. think you are smart enough to know why they don't do that at this stage, or are you pretending not to know? would pap adopt wp's policies even if they were to sweat at coming out with them? the ruling party would probably just say we already thought about that n it is in the pipeline. wp is better off just checking on govt policies with their current minority in parliament. if you want them to do more, you simply have to give them more power. if you ask me why things has to be this way, I can only tell you this is politics.
I don't think you heard clearly what LTK said about WP's role in parliament now, I suggest you go read it again.Originally Posted by minority
hello, didn't i quote about the medical and law school selection?!Originally Posted by minority
![]()
![]()
there are dozens of straight As students who didn't even get an interview. Fight harder?! how hard??!
and you are slapping yourself and argument. didn't you vouch for 'everyone fight for himself'? the government's role should be to level the playing field
eh moron, good read up on WP's manifestoOriginally Posted by minority
![]()
![]()
how to legislate a policy when a party has less than 10% of votes in parliament?! DOH![]()
![]()
Originally Posted by Regulators
why must I wait.? I dont need policy to be passed. Show me what policy plans then? you mean I must invest in something I donno until later down the road. What if its a dud? who's impact is that?
Originally Posted by eng81157
The manifesto is a joke.
the most ridiculous part is we are screaming about shortage of doctors and they did not open up more places in medical school. worse still, they are getting dr koh into dirty politics when they should be encouraging him to ply his trade for the good of the medical industryOriginally Posted by eng81157
just like how temasek holdings n gic invest n lost our money? lolOriginally Posted by minority
it was lim hng kiang's booboo - pandering to the whims of the elite and keep the club cosy for the privileged few.Originally Posted by Regulators
look at the impact 15 years down the road - escalating healthcare costs, shortage of local doctors, importing non-native physicians that can't speak in english or local mother tongue
and PAP's policies are the written truth and holier than Bible?!Originally Posted by minority
![]()
![]()
you are THE joke![]()
![]()
I don't think alleviating healthcare cost is their number one priority. medical bills are getting higher by the day, I just pity those on long term medical treatment. government allows doctors to ply between public n private practice n they deliberately put you at the back of the queue of you do not opt for private patient treatment. I had that experience when the doctor told me blatantly that if I opted for private, I could have the op the next day, If I opted for subsidised, the queue is up to three months later. is this the minister of health's idea of providing world class healthcare?Originally Posted by eng81157