Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 230

Thread: Many property owners are desperate...

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laguna
    My friend bot a condo unit at River Valley yesterday. In fact, they started viewing before CM6.

    Their calculation :
    Inflation is 4.5% a year, it will stay high, how to fight with this inflation?
    Interest rate low, and remain low.

    How they do?
    transfer the name of the only private propperty as single owner, pay only 3% of the half portion (subject to confirmation from lawyer)

    buy the second property under the other's name as first property and still taking 80% loan.

    well effectively u still pay 6% + lawyer fees

    3% to transfer 1st property

    3% to pay for the 2nd property

    unless ur 2nd unit is bigger if smaller then the 1st the saving is not much.

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    so those ground floor units facing road went for 7000psf?
    Sorry don't have the full price list as the Developer invites sold some on Sunday night.. but around $6kish
    http://SGNewCondoLaunch.com

    Feel free to take a look. Something new every month

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackjack21trader
    Singapore HDB policy is Santa Claus Policy.

    "What? Am I hearing this correctly," many young bothers and sisters now wondering if I am now typing from the IMH ( Institute of Mental Health).

    Let me explain before you jump to any conclusion.

    A NEW HDB gave the buyer an UNFAIR ADVANTAGE over the rest of the market segments. How so?

    Because it is a very Heavily Subsidised Investment. So UNFAIR that your humble brother sometimes imagine the HDB to be headed by Santa Claus giving away free monies !

    The construction costs itself for a single unit already well surpassed the price each citizen pay for a new HDB. Let alone if we were to take into consideration infrastructural costs or intangible benefits like lift lobby, carparks, gardens, public facillities like libraries and shopping malls.

    To add to this ridiculous charitable act, the Singapore Government actually built MRT stations ( or MTR as known in Hong Kong, or Subways as known in angmo cities ) and light rails system within walking distance of the new projects.

    Not surprisingly, the new HDB or new EC are always closer to MRT stations than the private condos. There is only one exception in the Lion City and that is ION Orchard.

    What were they thinking? Unlike the Minister who spent countless sleepless nights thinking about how to curb the sizzling hot Singapore property market; your humble brother here spent countless sleepless nights wondering if HDB is really headed by Santa Claus.

    Where on this Planet's developed cities can you find a new 900sqft 3 bedder apartment selling for less than S$500,000? If you convert that into British Pound or Swiss Franc, it looked even more ridiculous!

    Indeed, HDB is giving you free monies- albeit not in the form of hard cold cash, but in a form of market asset value which eventually you can choose to convert into cash if you want to.

    A quick mental work by your humble brother, for each new HDB unit, the buyer stands to gain at least S$20,000 from the construction costs, and at least an additional S$80,000 if you compare a similar sized HDB resale unit.

    A new BTO investment of about S$300,000 would be worth around S$400,000 if put into the resale market after complying the minimum occupation period. And that is just conservatively calculating.

    Then, for those uncles and aunties who bought their Marine Parade New HDB for less than S$100,000 20 years ago, it became even more ridiculous when a recent unit there was sold for a COLD HARD S$1,000,000.

    Now, if we even take a high inflation modal rate of 5% annually for 20 years, the uncles and aunties still stand to gain more than S$700,000 in present value terms !


    NOW YOU GET IT?

    Well, if you are a young investor with little capital, you should try to get married and then ballot for Executive Condo, BTO or HDB. Then, get a loan from HDB or bank to service your asset.

    Getting a HDB immediately after your marriage will have gotten you started a few hundred meters ahead from the rest of your peers in the long property investment marathon.

    PAP government is on the right track, dun be brainwashed by the Internet forums.

    see what my mentor said:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7D3_eGaO5k


    HDB Policy is also my Grandmother's Policy.

    "You can't be serious," I heard young punks saying this infront of their iPhones to me again.

    Read My Lips: HDB POLICY IS MY GRANDMOTHER'S POLICY !

    wow...that was just scary man......before you tell on me and get me to lim kopi, let me quickly tell you a story:

    Only a few brothers and sisters here are aware, I got to where I am today because I was born with a silver spoon. Or... I was born into a disgustingly rich family la. But anyway, that's another story.

    You see, I got a head start in property investment using a S$500,000 seed money given by my 100 years old grandmother on my 19th birthday la. ( Very paiseh...I play cheat la.....WOAHAHAHEHHEHEHEHEH )

    However, all is not lost! The roads to Rome are all different, but the destination is the same, my good young brothers and sisters.

    "I feel like smashing his face," indeed, my third eye heard you !

    Anyway, before you got all angry...listen to me for a sec.

    When you buy a HDB, the subsidised rate they gave you, is.......

    JUST LIKE THE SEED MONEY MY GRANDMOTHER GAVE ME !


    BINGO! Now you believe that I am an enlightened being with a THIRD EYE liao bo?
    Totally agree...

    LIKE+++

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DKSG
    There are still quite a a few doors open la ! Just work harder lor!

    Cant tell u more, if not later like ZeeWee's client - kenna jump Q!~
    Ok if you are the jumper, but I am usually the jumpee. hahaha!

    DKSG
    work very hard liao leh. any harder will overtake cow liao. LOL 1 month save 10k also need few years to DP shop house now. Damn sian

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZeeWee
    Sorry don't have the full price list as the Developer invites sold some on Sunday night.. but around $6kish
    oh ok, so plus GST, it'll be around $7k...

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    No, 3% is on your share of the existing property. The problem is more with the situation where you may have loans on existing property which makes transfer somehow more troublesome. Plus, transfer is considered sales, so SSD would be imposed if the unit is sold within 4 years.

    Quote Originally Posted by minority
    well effectively u still pay 6% + lawyer fees

    3% to transfer 1st property

    3% to pay for the 2nd property

    unless ur 2nd unit is bigger if smaller then the 1st the saving is not much.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Please refrain from using attacking words, and keep the forum a polite place as it has been.

    Emotion is an important factor to consider, and market sentiment has a great influence on the trend, this is exactly how Fed and ECB succeeded in reining the crisis, and the CM7 is going to play the other way round by gripping on the residential demand.

    The hot commercial/retail/strata office is another proof of the dramatic reduction in demand in residential space, as investors are forced to leave residential and look for greener pastures.

    Again, as I pointed out in the beginning, market may start to tilt towards to the buyers in the residential market as the reduction of demand will far outstrip the reduction in supply, so it doesn't make sense talking about things like holding your residential property tight tight.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Please refrain from using attacking words, and keep the forum a polite place as it has been.

    Emotion is an important factor to consider, and market sentiment has a great influence on the trend, this is exactly how Fed and ECB succeeded in reining the crisis, and the CM7 is going to play the other way round by gripping on the residential demand.

    The hot commercial/retail/strata office is another proof of the dramatic reduction in demand in residential space, as investors are forced to leave residential and look for greener pastures.

    Again, as I pointed out in the beginning, market may start to tilt towards to the buyers in the residential market as the reduction of demand will far outstrip the reduction in supply, so it doesn't make sense talking about things like holding your residential property tight tight.

    Title of thread should be changed to..desperate buyer urging owners not to hold tight tight .

    And no no matter how emotional you are, it won't rein in prices either We have seen mr B before. Months and months of hard work, poor despo guy .

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    I have been talking about the government measures and the market forces in general (reduction of demand, and market sentiment), so don't quote me wrongly. And pls don't anyhow link me with others. Good night.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Again, as I pointed out in the beginning, market may start to tilt towards to the buyers in the residential market as the reduction of demand will far outstrip the reduction in supply, so it doesn't make sense talking about things like holding your residential property tight tight.
    4yrs SSD is given any buyers in the last 2 years need to hold tight tight ma.....

    does your reduction in demand point to investment demand or housing demand as in physical place for some to reside in? the demand to reside is holding up but the supply of housing needs time to build. In fact the huge ramp up in supply by MND is to cater to housing need so to moderate prices?

    Only demand supply relationship possibly happening is housing demand is lower and physical supply is increased, that leads to a price drop.

    maybe very late liao, mind not working, i cannot comprehend how supply can reduce, alot of enbloc?

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Let's see what is in that white paper before we conclude if there will be a reduction in demand.
    Last edited by kane; 21-01-13 at 23:38.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Reduction in demand would refer to both investment and upgrading, for obvious reasons; Reduction in supply is a side effect of every CM which makes owners less willing to sell as it is also difficult for them to buy another one.

    The only difference in this CM7 is that the reduction in demand is probably much larger than the reduction in supply.

    Your quoted future 200K unit supply is something that will happen in the next few years, so it is not covered in my original thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaytonaSS
    4yrs SSD is given any buyers in the last 2 years need to hold tight tight ma.....

    does your reduction in demand point to investment demand or housing demand as in physical place for some to reside in? the demand to reside is holding up but the supply of housing needs time to build. In fact the huge ramp up in supply by MND is to cater to housing need so to moderate prices?

    Only demand supply relationship possibly happening is housing demand is lower and physical supply is increased, that leads to a price drop.

    maybe very late liao, mind not working, i cannot comprehend how supply can reduce, alot of enbloc?

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Reduction in demand would refer to both investment and upgrading, for obvious reasons; Reduction in supply is a side effect of every CM which makes owners less willing to sell as it is also difficult for them to buy another one.

    The only difference in this CM7 is that the reduction in demand is probably much larger than the reduction in supply.

    Your quoted future 200K unit supply is something that will happen in the next few years, so it is not covered in my original thread.
    IC, thanks for the explanation. abit of difference in demand and supply definition, so i m struggling to make sense.

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    Let's see what is in that white paper before we conclude if there will be a reduction in demand.
    bro Kane, my 2 hrs coffee session today at Tiong Bahru bakery confirms it liao, no need wait white paper. Just need to sit there 1pm to 3 pm, the answer is very clear. Hot MILFs are coming in DROVES

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Please refrain from using attacking words, and keep the forum a polite place as it has been.

    Emotion is an important factor to consider, and market sentiment has a great influence on the trend, this is exactly how Fed and ECB succeeded in reining the crisis, and the CM7 is going to play the other way round by gripping on the residential demand.

    The hot commercial/retail/strata office is another proof of the dramatic reduction in demand in residential space, as investors are forced to leave residential and look for greener pastures.

    Again, as I pointed out in the beginning, market may start to tilt towards to the buyers in the residential market as the reduction of demand will far outstrip the reduction in supply, so it doesn't make sense talking about things like holding your residential property tight tight.
    U are very premature in assuming that the residential property prices will fall due to reduction in demand. I would argue even if the demand is weaken, the price will remain strong or even stronger. I will predict that rental will provide a major role in supporting the residential property prices. At the moment people will flirt with the idea of investing in shares, bond or even commercial properties, but they will come back to residential properties. There is always a fear in people heart that they will be priced out of the residential properties if they waited for too long. The track record shows that residential property provided a high level of return and rental income. It will be hard for anyone to convince the people otherwise. With the global situation as it is (ie. Money printing) and lacking other invesment alternatives as a source of income, one would be foolish to start running toward the exit out of residential properties.

    If all u can think about is lack in demand will bring down the prices, u are very simplistic. The gov has the responsibility that sg doesn't become an urban ghetto. In a way this cm7 is a good way in controlling the quality of the people. From now on only people with good financial standing can purchase our properties. It also bring the ownership back to singaporeans (first time buyers). Why on earth that a better quality owners will bring down the price?

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    The assumption is based on simply market mechanism, yes, it is simple, but that's the gist of market. Sorry, it's getting late, have to call it a day, i can't address other parts of your post, good night.

    Quote Originally Posted by indomie
    U are very premature in assuming that the residential property prices will fall due to reduction in demand.

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    D15
    Posts
    5,095

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    The assumption is based on simply market mechanism, yes, it is simple, but that's the gist of market. Sorry, it's getting late, have to call it a day, i can't address other parts of your post, good night.
    WOAHAAHHHAHAHHEHEH

    CHIOKAPENG LA

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    D15
    Posts
    5,095

    Default

    KA NI GONG, NI MAI TIA

    MAI TU LIAO !


    Why people believe in academics but not in MY THIRD EYE leh?

    WOAHAHAHAHAHHHEHEHEH

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    238

    Default

    Looking at all the negative comments on CCR, time to buy & pick up durian in CCR!

    Quote Originally Posted by windcar
    CM7 does have a negative impact on CCR properties and the price gap between CCR and OCR will narrow even further. Almost all CMs affects properties as an investment more than ordinary home upgraders.

  20. #170
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by indomie
    U are very premature in assuming that the residential property prices will fall due to reduction in demand. I would argue even if the demand is weaken, the price will remain strong or even stronger. I will predict that rental will provide a major role in supporting the residential property prices. At the moment people will flirt with the idea of investing in shares, bond or even commercial properties, but they will come back to residential properties. There is always a fear in people heart that they will be priced out of the residential properties if they waited for too long. The track record shows that residential property provided a high level of return and rental income. It will be hard for anyone to convince the people otherwise. With the global situation as it is (ie. Money printing) and lacking other invesment alternatives as a source of income, one would be foolish to start running toward the exit out of residential properties.

    If all u can think about is lack in demand will bring down the prices, u are very simplistic. The gov has the responsibility that sg doesn't become an urban ghetto. In a way this cm7 is a good way in controlling the quality of the people. From now on only people with good financial standing can purchase our properties. It also bring the ownership back to singaporeans (first time buyers). Why on earth that a better quality owners will bring down the price?

    like your post!

    though i dislike the expensive property.
    I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” - Robert Frost quotes (American poet, 1874-1963)

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaytonaSS
    bro Kane, my 2 hrs coffee session today at Tiong Bahru bakery confirms it liao, no need wait white paper. Just need to sit there 1pm to 3 pm, the answer is very clear. Hot MILFs are coming in DROVES
    They working there or they buying things?

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sherlock
    I do read this forum almost everyday and I find most of the forummers helpful and kind.

    There are always 2 sides of the coin (or views in this aspect) so take the views and comments with a pinch of salt If one has a crystal ball he wont be here already...

    I am vested but I am also ok if prices do drop. Isnt this what the eco-system is all about? Who wants to sell if the graph is a straight line up?



    Just want to support what you had said about the graph. As you rightly pointed out, who want to sell if the graph is a straight line up.

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,516

    Default

    To be fair, this is another self proclaimed expert trying to seek attention like some others in the forum.

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,295

    Default

    "Many property owners are desperate..." another unfounded statement and wrongly used as subject title. Again as I mentioned in the other thread as well, TS is again resembling someone who is very biaised in this forum even those we promote freedom of speech

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    974

    Default

    While the Title of this thread may not be appropriate, it does 'catch attention' which I hope was the real intention of TS. The contents in this thread and the comments from various contributors show just how we all feel at heart even though many speak their minds rather than from their heart.

    The market is not likely to be influenced by what we discussed here even though there are paid forumers (from property developers or other interest parties) who are "doing their jobs" right here.

    Whoever you are, please be respectful to each other views and restrain from making your own assumptions about the individuals, associating people with other characters (in this forum) or challenging any individual at a personal level.

    Thus far, this thread has been rather enjoying.
    Last edited by Leeds; 22-01-13 at 11:20.

  26. #176
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Oh my, you are not afraid of being named as another clone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Leeds
    While the Title of this thread may not be appropriate, it does 'catch attention' which I hope was the real intention of TS. The contents in this thread and the comments from various contributors show just how we all feel at heart even though many speak their minds rather than from their heart.

    The market is not likely to be influenced by what we discussed here even though there are paid forumers (from property developers or other interest parties) who are "doing their jobs" right here.

    Whoever you are, please be respectful to each other views and restrain from making your own assumptions about the individuals, associating people with other characters (in this forum) or challenge any individual at a personal level.

    Thus far, this thread has been rather enjoying.

  27. #177
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Interesting, any idea who they might be?

    Quote Originally Posted by Leeds
    ... there are paid forumers (from property developers or other interest parties) who are "doing their jobs" right here.

  28. #178
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist
    Interesting, any idea who they might be?
    Actually I really doubt anybody is paid to tcss here. I think the folks here are just passionate about property. I am open to any question to challenge my integrity.

  29. #179
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leeds


    Just want to support what you had said about the graph. As you rightly pointed out, who want to sell if the graph is a straight line up.
    Somehow the graph shows are we are somewhere near or at the peak. But then, the new peak is always higher than the previous so you know where this is going.
    When you have eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

  30. #180
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leeds


    Just want to support what you had said about the graph. As you rightly pointed out, who want to sell if the graph is a straight line up.
    This plateauing graph for residential properties comes at another social cost. I believe the commercial properties graph does not present a pleasant picture, particularly if the higher rental results in inflation and also drive companies overseas. The impact should be hitting us badly this year - just watch out for your daily necessities prices.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    -: 29-09-21, 12:51
  2. for all property owners with more than 1 unit?
    By relax88 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 10
    -: 22-06-14, 23:50
  3. Desperate singles fall for Japan apartment 'fraud'
    By princess_morbucks in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 0
    -: 26-02-14, 17:39
  4. Desperate measures (Divorce wife and declare bankrupt) just to own a condo
    By mygeemeel in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 33
    -: 09-08-13, 16:35
  5. Let us ignore Richard Ng, the desperate agent
    By Regulators in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 9
    -: 15-04-10, 07:54

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •