Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 59

Thread: COE revamp suggestions

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default COE revamp suggestions

    The COE system really needs a re-look and revamp. Unfortunately, it is impossible to do away with.

    If LTA listens only to the auto industry alone for a revamp, there won't be much improvement because these agencies are self-serving. In the end the elevated costs are still passed to the consumer and the consumer is the one saddled with huge loan on a depreciating asset (or should I say liability).

    Associated services like financiers, insurers, after-sales ... etc stand to benefit from inflated car prices. This also benefits car dealers as well bcoz they in turn get a cut from the referrals.

    How about we pretend that we are LTA. Let's brainstorm some ideas on how to revamp the COE system.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    I'll start the ball rolling.


    1. COE cost cannot be loaned.
    2. Pay as you bid - not pay the lowest strike price.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    1. COE cost cannot be loaned.
    2. Pay as you bid - not pay the lowest strike price
    3. Car buyers to bid COEs on their own instead of dealers bidding for them

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howgozit
    1. COE cost cannot be loaned.
    2. Pay as you bid - not pay the lowest strike price
    3. Car buyers to bid COEs on their own instead of dealers bidding for them
    Pro family policy.

    Every singaporean given ONE 10% dependent COE rebate voucher.
    Each car can be register with max of 4 dependent rebate vouchers.

    So for the following familes, all entitled max 40% rebate
    1) husband, wife, 3 children
    2) husband, wife, 2 parents and handicapped sibling.
    3) widowed husband/wife, 2 children and 2 parents
    ....

  5. #5
    ikan bilis's Avatar
    ikan bilis is offline i'm Buaya ! Girls BEWARE !!...
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howgozit
    1. COE cost cannot be loaned.
    2. Pay as you bid - not pay the lowest strike price
    3. Car buyers to bid COEs on their own instead of dealers bidding for them
    .... what if dealers selling all the new cars as second-hand car ??....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ikan bilis
    .... what if dealers selling all the new cars as second-hand car ??....
    Second hand cars come with COEs right?

    So what you are saying is that dealers buy the COEs first and then sell them back to car buyers with a car.

    Sure it can happen but that's a big risk to the car dealers is it not? The car dealer cannot have a binding contract to ensure that a buyer purchases the car after the dealer has secured a COE.

    Its an even bigger risk if they buy COEs without confirming a buyer. I imagine dealers for Cherry QQ would go bankrupt.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    car dealers should never be the one to bid for COE, there is a major conflict of interest

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    616

    Default

    increase the scrap value of cars from 8 years onwards and allow the industry to transfer COE for cars beyong economical repair

    All new cars to have min. two front airbag and traction control . Taxis included factory fitted ABS.

    This would not only increase the rate of scrap as well as ensure that the cars that are paid are safe. Else to increase the profitability may result in a less then safe car.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,569

    Default

    If the purpose of the COE is to control the vehicles on-road by having a quota, then it should not be linked with monetary values. It should have been balloted monthly and it all boils down to your LUCK(like HDB BTO).

    However, since the govt. wishes to earn money from the COE to offset some expenses from providing transport infrastructure, then the best of both worlds would be to :-
    1) Every buyer put in a bid(of his desire, not the motor companies decision).
    2) This bid will be put into a balloting system for draw monthly
    3) If quota is 100 for the month, the 1st 100 drawn from the balloting will PAY the MEDIAN of the bids(after eliminating the top 20% highest price bids and the bottom 20% loweest price bids).

    To prevent profiteering:-
    1) COE cannot be transferred for the 1st year.
    2) When sold off or scrap, COE is NON-REFUNDABLE(No pro-rata).
    3) Allow the same COE to be used if you change car(like now). However, cannot be sold off for 1 yr again.

    But I know this system will not materialise since govt is interested more in maximising the value from the COE system . The lesser evil is that Only RICH can play the game which is acceptable to the govt.
    Last edited by focus; 11-01-13 at 21:10.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    My colleague wrote to Mr Lui yesterday and received a reply very quickly that they will revert soon. His perm sec must be busy.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Wrt balloting, its not just about making money.

    If there is ballot system, every eligible person (including PRs, foreigners) will ballot at every COE exercise. Since there is no cost involved. Even if they have no intention to own a car.

    What if you own a business or in a job that requires a vehicle, then how? Must wait until you strike the COE lottery?

    Meanwhile the resale car prices will skyrocket... since new cars are by the luck of the draw. If the demand is what it is now, prices of cars will still hover around where they are now.

    Quite hard to work I think.

    Quote Originally Posted by focus
    If the purpose of the COE is to control the vehicles on-road by having a quota, then it should not be linked with monetary values. It should have been balloted monthly and it all boils down to your LUCK(like HDB BTO).

    However, since the govt. wishes to earn money from the COE to offset some expenses from providing transport infrastructure, then the best of both worlds would be to :-
    1) Every buyer put in a bid(of his desire, not the motor companies decision).
    2) This bid will be put into a balloting system for draw monthly
    3) If quota is 100 for the month, the 1st 100 drawn from the balloting will PAY the MEDIAN of the bids(after eliminating the top 20% highest price bids and the bottom 20% loweest price bids).

    To prevent profiteering:-
    1) COE cannot be transferred for the 1st year.
    2) When sold off or scrap, COE is NON-REFUNDABLE(No pro-rata).
    3) Allow the same COE to be used if you change car(like now). However, cannot be sold off for 1 yr again.

    But I know this system will not materialise since govt is interested more in maximising the value from the COE system . The lesser evil is that Only RICH can play the game which is acceptable to the govt.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    Remove COE and make people pay based on usage rate since GPS ERP is already in the testing phase.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,823

    Default

    There are 1 M cars in Singapore, each will last for 10 years.
    So the annual quota should be 100K per year.
    Each year has 24 bidding sessions, so each bidding session should have
    100K / 24 = 4K Quota.
    Just maintain this stable supply, the price stability will be much better.

    Currently there are only 1.5K supply per session.
    (And there will be 10K? supply per session in year 2015).

    Thanks,
    Richard

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richwang
    There are 1 M cars in Singapore, each will last for 10 years.
    So the annual quota should be 100K per year.
    Each year has 24 bidding sessions, so each bidding session should have
    100K / 24 = 4K Quota.
    Just maintain this stable supply, the price stability will be much better.

    Currently there are only 1.5K supply per session.
    (And there will be 10K? supply per session in year 2015).

    Thanks,
    Richard
    This is dependent on the amount of cars being scrapped at each point in time. Some cars get scrapped after 2 or 3 years where others drive on for 20 or even 30 years.

    The quota will shift according to the existing number of cars on the road... and since the rate of scrapping is not fixed, the quota size cannot be fixed either.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    If LTA is reading this, my idea is to levy BSD on foreigners for passenger vehicles.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    i second the idea of pay as much as you bid.

    those lux cars with small turbo charged engine should be in a Cat A+, separate from the basic Cat A category.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,516

    Default

    Interest rate for car loan may increase soon.

    20% cash downpayment could be mandatory.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,677

    Default

    reverting back to 30% down and 7 yrs loan cap as per the yester years will ensure a stable mkt. those who can't afford new car just buy 2nd hand. last time the mkt was like that and it was very stable.

    but now alot of rich pple around, not like last time. so there has to be some mechanism for singaporeans to be able to own their 1 car allocation. but how to allocate will be a tough nut to crack. by person/address - all these can be circumvented.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shanhz
    reverting back to 30% down and 7 yrs loan cap as per the yester years will ensure a stable mkt. those who can't afford new car just buy 2nd hand. last time the mkt was like that and it was very stable.

    but now alot of rich pple around, not like last time. so there has to be some mechanism for singaporeans to be able to own their 1 car allocation. but how to allocate will be a tough nut to crack. by person/address - all these can be circumvented.
    Its not tough, its impossible.

    There more people than cars allowed.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,063

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyenergix
    If LTA is reading this, my idea is to levy BSD on foreigners for passenger vehicles.
    Some suggestions:

    Foreigners pay 200% of the COE price.

    SPR pay 100% of COE price.

    SC get 50% rebate from the COE price.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DC33_2008
    Remove COE and make people pay based on usage rate since GPS ERP is already in the testing phase.
    Prepare to have a lot more parking lots... People will buy more cars and select which car to drive...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    i second the idea of pay as much as you bid.

    those lux cars with small turbo charged engine should be in a Cat A+, separate from the basic Cat A category.
    Engine capacity can no longer be used... Electric car where got engine capacity... Category should go by how powerful the car is... Close loop hole on turbo, hybrids...

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Just my thoughts

    - Change the mindset of owning a car in Singapore. We all perceived that a car ownership is cool and atas. Its like smoking were well received until images alter how we look at it now.

    - Public transport need to be improved. With influx of foreigners, it can becomes quite unpleasant for taking buses and MRT now. Maybe they should not privatize them giving me an impression that their profit comes way before service.

    - Remove or reduce carparks. Concentrate with a mega carpark in certain MRT stations. So perhaps we will all start parking there and proceed with public transport.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DC33_2008
    Remove COE and make people pay based on usage rate since GPS ERP is already in the testing phase.
    Govt wants to earn both from COE and ERP... Next time there'll be ERP deduction whenever you drive out of your home carpark...

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    out law all cars. only commercial or business n public transport have car. rest walk , bike or take public transport.

    wah lah! solve high COE problem and traffic jam!

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ysyap
    Govt wants to earn both from COE and ERP... Next time there'll be ERP deduction whenever you drive out of your home carpark...

    no $ to pay better dont drive. take public transport loh. so concern tax. all these are consumption tax. u consume u get tax. dont want to pay? have a choice dont consume!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,823

    Default

    Everything has its fair price. The fair price for COE is around S$20K as per the following calculation:

    The average quota for yearly COE should be 100K if the seller has done a decent job to smooth the supply. The expected revenue from COE is S$2B per year. So the fair price for COE is

    S$2B / 100K = S$20K

    The officers who caused the COE price to drop to S$2 should be fired, as well as those who will push the COE price to beyond S$150K (soon?)

    Thanks,
    Richard

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richwang
    Everything has its fair price. The fair price for COE is around S$20K as per the following calculation:

    The average quota for yearly COE should be 100K if the seller has done a decent job to smooth the supply. The expected revenue from COE is S$2B per year. So the fair price for COE is

    S$2B / 100K = S$20K

    The officers who caused the COE price to drop to S$2 should be fired, as well as those who will push the COE price to beyond S$150K (soon?)

    Thanks,
    Richard
    Hi just curious why the expected revenue is 2 bil?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richwang
    Everything has its fair price. The fair price for COE is around S$20K as per the following calculation:

    The average quota for yearly COE should be 100K if the seller has done a decent job to smooth the supply. The expected revenue from COE is S$2B per year. So the fair price for COE is

    S$2B / 100K = S$20K

    The officers who caused the COE price to drop to S$2 should be fired, as well as those who will push the COE price to beyond S$150K (soon?)

    Thanks,
    Richard

    just curious how u come up with a fair price? its bidded where more people feel rich bid higher. make $ in share or property go cheong cars.

    so how to fair priced it?

    lucky draw ? or national car lottery? or base on 1st alphabet of the sir name?

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    in land scare singapore. car should be a luxury.. take public transport. if u need a car means u have to be willing to pay for it. coz its a luxury.

    car is not a birth right. u are born with legs not wheels.

Similar Threads

  1. Budget 2014 Suggestions
    By richwang in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 15
    -: 03-12-13, 21:36
  2. Here's how to make HDBs cheaper! PropertyNewbie's suggestions for Mr Khaw
    By PropertyNewbie in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 39
    -: 31-03-13, 15:31
  3. Suggestions Please
    By x11 in forum District 21
    Replies: 15
    -: 03-09-10, 12:30
  4. Can't seem to find a suitable condo, suggestions?
    By HungryPillow in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 83
    -: 03-06-09, 12:02
  5. Suggestions Please
    By x11 in forum District 5
    Replies: 0
    -: 23-02-09, 12:52

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •