Yes yes I agree ... There r indeed a handful of folks out there who owned several properties which have been fully paid. Their rental income is the true passive incomeOriginally Posted by radha08
Yes yes I agree ... There r indeed a handful of folks out there who owned several properties which have been fully paid. Their rental income is the true passive incomeOriginally Posted by radha08
wont it be more difficult to own fully paid propertiesOriginally Posted by radha08
Properties are bought to be kept for passive income. Getting more and more difficult to own multiple properties with this latest CM. Those who refinance their loans 2-3 years have the best deals as spread is low and longer tenure.Originally Posted by zeamybro
Thought you have already bought for them and use them as a retirement plan as well.Originally Posted by buttercarp
no more landlord dream for a lot of people liao.
Blame US QE3 and superb sale at KR and Eco.Originally Posted by auroraborealis
why current LTV only 60%? that is >1 mortgages.Originally Posted by CP5211
then if buy later, LTV still 60%? that is only for 1st mortgage.
CM indirectly prohibiting Senior HDB dwellers with fully paid up flats with some cash who will overstretch if purchase PC and thinking rental of the flat can pay for the mortgage. .Originally Posted by ikan bilis
Is it worth it too have so long tenure. Your principal will never draw down and paying a lot more interest.Originally Posted by price
Please PM me if you know of any such deal.Originally Posted by blackjack21trader
A longer loan repayment period make sense for investors because investors are always looking for return on investment. So the less capital we put into the property, the higher our returns.Originally Posted by DC33_2008
For ordinary home buyers, they should tailor their loan repayment period to the age they want to retire. Which is similar to what the MAS is preaching right now.
I'm an investor who's gonna be renting out the proprieties and obviously I won't be holding them for 40-50 years (probably sold and bought others by then) Given that I'm in my early 20s and the low interest rates now why not?
Last edited by price; 06-10-12 at 09:45.
That is what the wealthier ones will do. Rich becomes richer .Originally Posted by Laguna
True only if there is no major correction, investors have holding power, and existing cash is put in high yielding instruments.Originally Posted by price
Yep, which is why I agree with today's ST article. this CM will cut out those borderline investorsOriginally Posted by DC33_2008
Good or no good?Originally Posted by price
Hi bros
I am new but have been reading on this interesting forum for few months.
I still unsure how this cm can have any effect to cool the property market. Let take an example, couple both 45 years old, looking to buy their 2nd property, currently one almost paid up, what happened if they want to buy a $2m property? They can loan up to max 20 years, what is the new loan quantum now? Thanks
Almost paid and fully paid will result in diff ltv.if fully paid and applying 20 yr loan. Ltv is 80%. If almost paid- ltv will be 60%.Originally Posted by Werther
go pay up the first loan and get 80% LTV....Originally Posted by Werther
main difference....
1.6mil, 20yrs, 1.5%.... 7.7K/month
1.6mil, 30yrs, 1.5%.... 5.5K/month (last time only, now LTV will be 60%)
Do not concur with point (3) generally. Rental is easier and better yield for two bedder in CCR and city fringe due to expand budget constraint. Your observation may apply to OCR. Just my opinion.Originally Posted by Laguna
Originally Posted by Werther
its either fully or not paid up, no such thing as almost paid up.
For 2nd loan you will have to pay 40% down payment ($800K) and 60% loan for 20 years maximum.
Good for the government, good for the people of this nation. They are protecting people who are unable to tide through major price corrections or economy downturns.Originally Posted by chestnut
Thanks everyone for the swift response.Originally Posted by ikan bilis
If I didn't remember wrongly, the lasts cm already state that if got one outstanding loan, the next one is need 40%, so this cm is not new, rite?
cooling measure
苦了。没辙!
yes, agreed.Originally Posted by DC33_2008
In other words, if they want bigger space with the same budget, they need to move to OCR but too far from schools and work place, and with good transport.
Let us see the price of next GLS closing, the impact could then be better assessed
higher dosage... LTV can gone down to 40% (means 60% downpayment)... copying HK...Originally Posted by Werther
Cannot like that decide.Originally Posted by ikan bilis
1. Need to see which one is rental? Take loan max against rental unit to offset tax.
2. See how much need to pay off for 1 sr property. If it's property is for rental, again, loan interest can be used to offset tax.
3. He could be hoarding cash and can easily pay up the 40%. Because his case there is no diff from last finance package, only diff is retirement and 30 yr term.
Others- there are other reasons as well
what is new is now you cant borrow past 65 years old or have loan tenure beyond 35 years whichever is shorterOriginally Posted by Werther
This CM affects even old first time buyers as they can no longer stretch their loan tenure beyond their retirement age of 65 unless they pay more upfront cash.Originally Posted by Werther
Bank did not ask you to keep there for a period of time as a consideration in the agreement. Bank is doing a dis-service to customer.Originally Posted by price
I fully agree. This is like a casino but the stakes are in the millions.if cannot afford, don't play. If not there will be many bankrupts in a major recession. I feel govt is moving in right direction.Originally Posted by price