Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: big plot size at east coast road

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    828

    Default big plot size at east coast road

    Beside the seaview,
    what other fh projt has very big plot along east coast road,
    excluding amber,mayer area,and telok kurau.
    parc seabreeze? Coralis?
    i c that poshgrove east and d ecosia has v big plot.
    Look gd. Any forumer feedback on poshgrove east.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    600

    Default

    Must it be along east coast road or near east coast road also can?

    Haig court fit?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    Grand duchess, flamingo valley, part east...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    132

    Default

    Do you know why government building ERL ? Think you just provide an answer.

    Along Thomson line, there is also a lot of empty land from woodland to amk. Our government will $$$$$

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Ya, thanks, grand duchess.
    as for flamingo valley, let give it a miss.
    not really keen to bump into yowetan

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan0503
    Must it be along east coast road or near east coast road also can?

    Haig court fit?
    thanks,
    Near east coast road is fine.
    i just recall 2 big plot, feo seawind and sound.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    828

    Default

    2 or 3more,
    katong gdn and malvern spring.
    Sandalwood not small as well.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Finland Gardens...freehold on 98000 sq ft...

    This is rarely mentioned.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tkc2263
    Finland Gardens...freehold on 98000 sq ft...

    This is rarely mentioned.
    Cool, thanks.
    that really big.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    600

    Default

    May I know what's your purpose? Looking to buy a unit?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marktkt22
    Cool, thanks.
    that really big.
    if you thinking of it being enbloc.. forget it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    828

    Default

    I was looking for a place tat wont be enbloc

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    if you thinking of it being enbloc.. forget it.
    I am curious to know why you are confident that it wont go en bloc, not that I have a unit there.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tkc2263
    I am curious to know why you are confident that it wont go en bloc, not that I have a unit there.
    simply because its current planned land use is for 3 storey mixed landed. Not a condo. So the amount the developer can possibly get from selling the whole plot as landed will be for sure less than selling it as a condo. thus the ultimate prices to the current owners will be less. So tough to enbloc. Unless the land use changes.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    simply because its current planned land use is for 3 storey mixed landed. Not a condo. So the amount the developer can possibly get from selling the whole plot as landed will be for sure less than selling it as a condo. thus the ultimate prices to the current owners will be less. So tough to enbloc. Unless the land use changes.
    What about St Patrick's Garden then, dont forget UOL has it en bloc..

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tkc2263
    What about St Patrick's Garden then, dont forget UOL has it en bloc..
    st patricks garden is a condo and redeveloped as a condo. see URA 2008 master plan for landed. you cannot compare finland to st patricks. their land use is different for redevelopment.

    besides, after finland's last failed enbloc attempt, the current owners will for sure want to ask for more $$ money now. so i would say very tough for developers and owners to meet their price targets.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    finland garden land size is approx 9600sq meter. given that eastrees which is round the corner is selling around 3.3M for each unit the total land size of the 8units approx 2800sq meter. so approx 28-30units of cluster terraces can be built at finland. which gives 100M maximum as total sale value to the developer.

    there are currently 48 units at at finland. the smallest is approx 1324sqft and biggest at 1894sqft. lets use 1500sqft as the average size. given the current prices of approx 1-1.1kpsf the total value that the owners can get is approx 72-86M.

    So how can the developer buy.

    Unless my above assumptions are wrong, i seriously doubt Finland enbloc can take off.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    mkl22, if I may prove you wrong..

    I reckon that FG stands a good chance of going en bloc.

    This en bloc was successful (then canned) before the property prices went

    ballistic.

    Now with no more sizeable yet biteable land plots around that area with St

    Patrick's Gardens being the most recent to en bloc, coupled with a very

    good chance of having a mrt station at its doorsteps, I wouldnt rule out FG

    attracting developers' interests.

    Also with Mr Singh now with a global agency, who is to say he is not keen to

    to have a 2nd bite of the cherry.

    What FG can be developed into......

    http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/grou...e/message/1517

    Everything is Possible..

    My worth..

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    i still say tough. ok if 44units can be built. and each unit approx 800k to build(lower end already) gives you 35M plus around 110-120M to make the owners sell, which is an approximate premium of 30% of the current prices. you need to sell the houses at 3.5M to break even.

    if construction costs per house is 500k and somehow the developers manage to buy the whole plot at 86M. pure breakeven is 2.5M. still need to add fees and what nots.

    if it was at the old price of 49M of course can.
    Last edited by mkl22; 20-09-12 at 16:36.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    i still say tough. ok if 44units can be built. and each unit approx 800k to build(lower end already) gives you 35M plus around 110-120M to make the owners sell, which is an approximate premium of 30% of the current prices. you need to sell the houses at 3.5M to break even.

    if construction costs per house is 500k and somehow the developers manage to buy the whole plot at 86M. pure breakeven is 2.5M. still need to add fees and what nots.

    if it was at the old price of 49M of course can.
    Are owners of FG that dumb?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tkc2263
    Are owners of FG that dumb?
    of course not la. just saying that the prices have already gone up so much. and the main issue is due to the restriction of 3 storey mixed landed use. this also effectively prevents foreign ownership. thus this sort of strata semi-D/ terraces are harder to move. and if i was going to pay close to 4M, i rather get a proper terrace or semi instead of strata.

    but maybe you are right. but i just cannot see it happening based on what i had assumed.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    of course not la. just saying that the prices have already gone up so much. and the main issue is due to the restriction of 3 storey mixed landed use. this also effectively prevents foreign ownership. thus this sort of strata semi-D/ terraces are harder to move. and if i was going to pay close to 4M, i rather get a proper terrace or semi instead of strata.

    but maybe you are right. but i just cannot see it happening based on what i had assumed.
    Assumptions are just assumptions. I too dont see the en bloc coming onstream so soon, but my guess is within 3 years a developer will bite, attracted by its size, freehold status and potential proximity to a mrt station.

    The developer can also choose to build projects like the St Patrick's Residence, no restriction to foreigners as far as I know.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Isn't st Patrick's a condo? I don't think it can be built on the FG Plot.
    Last edited by mkl22; 20-09-12 at 22:30.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    Isn't st Patrick's a condo? I don't think it can be built on the FG Plot.
    Are you saying the FG's site cant be redeveloped into something like The

    Axis@Siglap, St Patricks Residence or it must be a 3-storey mixed landed

    project?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    according the the land use planning it must be 3 storey mixed landed. the mixed here means it can be terrace, semi-D or bungalow. But for sure it cannot be a condo like what FG is right now or axis. it must be like eastrees. That is what i interpret it to be and it seems so. otherwise Eastrees would have been a MM to maximize profits liao.

    Thats why i say the land use limits the ultimate value that the owners can get. if can built a condo, enbloc chances are much much higher.
    If a condo can be built, assuming a plot ratio of 1.4 and with 10% balcony. the GFA can be approx 150ksqft. with a selling price of 1400psf, about 200M can be made. so probably can offer approx 100-120M to the owners.

    To make the same amount for a landed development means each house will be 4.8M. who will buy at 4.8M?

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    according the the land use planning it must be 3 storey mixed landed. the mixed here means it can be terrace, semi-D or bungalow. But for sure it cannot be a condo like what FG is right now or axis. it must be like eastrees. That is what i interpret it to be and it seems so. otherwise Eastrees would have been a MM to maximize profits liao.

    Thats why i say the land use limits the ultimate value that the owners can get. if can built a condo, enbloc chances are much much higher.
    If a condo can be built, assuming a plot ratio of 1.4 and with 10% balcony. the GFA can be approx 150ksqft. with a selling price of 1400psf, about 200M can be made. so probably can offer approx 100-120M to the owners.

    To make the same amount for a landed development means each house will be 4.8M. who will buy at 4.8M?
    If your assertion is true, then Axis@Siglap cant be built as such, right??

    Axis' legal completion was in 2010 only, so it a recent kinda of thing.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tkc2263
    If your assertion is true, then Axis@Siglap cant be built as such, right??

    Axis' legal completion was in 2010 only, so it a recent kinda of thing.
    just look at the URA master plan 2008 la. must i continue to spoon feed you with the information?

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    just look at the URA master plan 2008 la. must i continue to spoon feed you with the information?
    Dont be a jerk....

  29. #29
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    976

    Default

    Bro before things get nasty ...it's true.

    FG is gazetted for landed/cluster housing. (Got me too back then)
    You can google for it (I think) coz they tried to EB - stated there too.
    There are other examples of these and some have EBed - Whitley Heights comes to mind.


    Quote Originally Posted by tkc2263
    If your assertion is true, then Axis@Siglap cant be built as such, right??

    Axis' legal completion was in 2010 only, so it a recent kinda of thing.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    deleted. no further comment
    Last edited by mkl22; 21-09-12 at 17:06.

Similar Threads

  1. New upcoming condo East Coast Siglap road
    By briris in forum Marketplace
    Replies: 1
    -: 29-12-16, 17:38
  2. MAYFAIR RESIDENCE @ EAST COAST ROAD
    By yesnomaybe in forum District 15
    Replies: 14
    -: 26-07-14, 02:38
  3. Replies: 21
    -: 28-08-12, 10:56
  4. MODA @ East Coast Road - Launching very soon
    By Sinclone in forum District 15
    Replies: 40
    -: 25-08-12, 10:30
  5. Balcon East @ Upper East Coast Road
    By ras in forum District 15
    Replies: 8
    -: 20-07-11, 01:09

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •