Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: Property buyers, mind that lease

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    10,829

    Default Property buyers, mind that lease

    http://www.straitstimes.com/archive/...lease-20120909

    SMALL CHANGE

    Property buyers, mind that lease

    Leasehold tenures may offer better yields, but tread cautiously

    Published on Sep 09, 2012

    By Lee Su Shyan Money Editor


    When investing in private property, I hold the notion that freehold is best and 99-year leasehold is to be avoided, but this view has been tested in recent years.

    Values for many leasehold properties are holding up well and some are even outstripping that of similar freehold developments, so the old certainties do not always apply.

    Freehold is not a universal concept either. Residential land in China is typically sold with tenure of 70 years and only 50 years in some cases in Hong Kong.

    Australian property is mostly freehold while in Britain, it can vary from freehold to leasehold.

    I often pore through advertisements for British property and when what seems like a bargain stands out, the fly in the ointment is often the lease term - of as little as 20 years sometimes.

    Having a longer tenure means freehold commands a premium to leasehold. On that score, since rents would not differ that much, the higher yields for a leasehold property are one factor in its favour.

    But leasehold properties here have also kept their value well in recent years.

    For example, the leasehold project The Sail sells for around $2,000 per sq ft (psf). Recent transactions at Caribbean at Keppel Bay show that units were going at around $1,500 psf, with some going for even higher prices like $1,800 psf.

    Contrast that to the more than 900-year leasehold properties in the prime River Valley area where transactions for Valley Park and Aspen Heights hover around the $1,500 psf range too.

    Of course, no two projects are alike. The latter two I cited are older but they are large plots of land, offering a range of facilities for residents. They are even candidates for collective sales, something that should help to prop up their value.

    In recent years, it has been proximity to MRT stations that gives a fillip to values, even if they are leasehold projects. Around the Redhill MRT station for example, transactions at the leasehold Metropolitan, Tanglin View and Tanglin Regency are all comfortably within the $1,200 to $1,400 psf range.

    Last week, the Government launched a residential site for sale where developers have an option to bid for a 30-, 45- or 60-year lease period. The site offers the option of building retirement housing.

    With developers expected to bid less than what they would for a 99-year lease, the obvious result is that buyers can expect more attractive pricing.

    Singapore as a vibrant property market should offer a variety of sizes, locations, designs or land tenures to cater to the different needs of various buyers.

    However, as home buyers are familiar only with tenures that are 99 years, freehold or 999 years leasehold, there would be less clarity about the pricing of projects with other lease periods.

    Applying straight line depreciation, the value of land erodes by about 1 per cent a year for a 99-year leasehold site and 1.7 per cent a year for a 60-year lease.

    After 20 years, the difference is starker. The land value would have depreciated by 20 per cent for the 99-year site and 34 per cent for the 60-year site.

    In any case, with a project's pricing subject to many factors such as location and design, it is not clear if that full difference will eventually be reflected in the selling price. All it takes is for developers to price their projects just a tad lower and property agents to trumpet the attractive yield before investors may jump on the bandwagon.

    As Singapore is a relatively young country, there are fewer precedents of lease renewal and top-ups to guide buyers in their decisions.

    With different lease tenures, it will take time before buyers get to grips with how to evaluate if a property is worth buying or not.

    That is why my money is still on freehold, if only because it is likely to entail fewer problems in passing the property to the next generation.

    [email protected]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,368

    Default

    Good point except for the following:-

    1) Depreciation is not straight line - it increases as the property ages. See formula at SLA

    2) He names a very good point where 20 year lease property in London are going for dirt cheap prices

    3) He forgot the main reason why 99Lh are holding up is due to land intensification. If one unit can be enbloced to entail 2 units for the future developer (i.e. double the plot ratio), even if PSF goes down, the fact that u have double the space to sell means, u still make a handsome profit, like in the case of Thomson View. The PSFPPR is unimpressive but the intensification of the GFA means everyone makes 30% premium, despite the lease depreciation (esp when a large part of proceeds goes to govt for lease topup). This means if your condo has maxed out the GFA, the chance of enbloc of a 99LH is close to nil. Those 99LH that manage to enbloc are those with the plot ratio intensified.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    Plot ratio will move up eventually. Even if going underground.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    anybody knows why Kovan Regency can have high rise 99LH building in the middle of low rise landed properties?!

    moral of the story, be very careful with non-prime 99LH that is super-crammed with no land intensification potential, a few recent projects come to mind
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    one word. Connections?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carbuncle
    one word. Connections?
    guess they allow it due to proximity to Kovan MRT
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,368

    Default

    I think those near MRT stations got higher chance of increase in plot ratio. But not guaranteed.

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera
    anybody knows why Kovan Regency can have high rise 99LH building in the middle of low rise landed properties?!

    moral of the story, be very careful with non-prime 99LH that is super-crammed with no land intensification potential, a few recent projects come to mind

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wild Falcon
    Good point except for the following:-

    1) Depreciation is not straight line - it increases as the property ages. See formula at SLA

    2) He names a very good point where 20 year lease property in London are going for dirt cheap prices

    3) He forgot the main reason why 99Lh are holding up is due to land intensification. If one unit can be enbloced to entail 2 units for the future developer (i.e. double the plot ratio), even if PSF goes down, the fact that u have double the space to sell means, u still make a handsome profit, like in the case of Thomson View. The PSFPPR is unimpressive but the intensification of the GFA means everyone makes 30% premium, despite the lease depreciation (esp when a large part of proceeds goes to govt for lease topup). This means if your condo has maxed out the GFA, the chance of enbloc of a 99LH is close to nil. Those 99LH that manage to enbloc are those with the plot ratio intensified.

    good points but I think I should sound a strong caveat. With the govt piloting 60yrs or less LH plots, the chances of enblocing/land intensification may lessen somewhat especially if the public becomes more 'accepting' of 60yrs LH plots.

    I may be wrong but if 60yrs LH plots takes off, the trend for govt to approve 99yr lease extensions will diminish. More and more plots will be converted to 60yrs LH as and when they become due. This will happen to HDB too to increase affordability.

    Why? because shorter leasehold terms give the govt more flexibility in urban planning and MORE importantly, faster turnover to increase land sale revenues. 99yrs LH plots may become a thing of the past but with that said, I will probably not see it in my lifetime as a lot of the 99yr LH plots have yet to come due.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by proper-t
    good points but I think I should sound a strong caveat. With the govt piloting 60yrs or less LH plots, the chances of enblocing/land intensification may lessen somewhat especially if the public becomes more 'accepting' of 60yrs LH plots.

    I may be wrong but if 60yrs LH plots takes off, the trend for govt to approve 99yr lease extensions will diminish. More and more plots will be converted to 60yrs LH as and when they become due. This will happen to HDB too to increase affordability.

    Why? because shorter leasehold terms give the govt more flexibility in urban planning and MORE importantly, faster turnover to increase land sale revenues. 99yrs LH plots may become a thing of the past but with that said, I will probably not see it in my lifetime as a lot of the 99yr LH plots have yet to come due.
    Bro agree... my theory on plot ratio increase is
    1. Govt do not want to see some old building spoiling the facade and increasing plot ratio allows rejuvenation to the area.
    2. plot ratio increase will take place around mrt to take advantage of higher ridership.
    when 60 yr lease available, i will buy to stay and rent out my existing unit. or even buy it and rent it out.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by proper-t
    good points but I think I should sound a strong caveat. With the govt piloting 60yrs or less LH plots, the chances of enblocing/land intensification may lessen somewhat especially if the public becomes more 'accepting' of 60yrs LH plots.

    I may be wrong but if 60yrs LH plots takes off, the trend for govt to approve 99yr lease extensions will diminish. More and more plots will be converted to 60yrs LH as and when they become due. This will happen to HDB too to increase affordability.

    Why? because shorter leasehold terms give the govt more flexibility in urban planning and MORE importantly, faster turnover to increase land sale revenues. 99yrs LH plots may become a thing of the past but with that said, I will probably not see it in my lifetime as a lot of the 99yr LH plots have yet to come due.
    if this is the trend going fwd, then how do we take advantage...buy & hold 999/f'hold only since it will become even more valauble if 99yrs LH plots disappears? anyway, like u said, probly only my grandchildren/great grandchildren will benefit.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    I think garmen is not yet serious about 60LH being the norm yet ... if anything to go they should start with HDB isn't it?
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    Shit!!! then us existing landlords will be stuck with 99 or FH cant compete with 60LH low asking rents!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    I seriously doubt owners of 60yr LH will ask for lower rentals. Just look at the 99LH rental is as high, if not higher than some FH projects. Rental is usually independent of FH/LH. Amenities and MRT accessibility is more commanding...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    yep, agree with ysyap. Its not as if they are gonna release a slew of new 60yrs LH plots. It just that existing 99yrs LH plots will gradually be converted to 60yrs. The GLS will continue but no more 99yrs LH plots will be offered for sale in time to come.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    you are right.... :/

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom_opera
    I think garmen is not yet serious about 60LH being the norm yet ... if anything to go they should start with HDB isn't it?
    Therein lies the beauty of their strategy..if they can succeed, they will effectively bring down the price of the private property sector without pissing off HDB owners or affecting HDB prices. Right now, our ppi doesn't differentiate between FH/LH transactions.

    they can then say with a straight face that ppi has come down x% just like they say that EP rejects have increased by 30%....

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    49

    Default

    Frankly speaking, I doubt the price will drop much with 60yrs LH. As long as the project is in a good location with good amenities and transport, people will still buy and developers can still sell at high price. Looking at current, many 99 years command higher psf than freehold. Price is dependent on supply and demand. All these will only benefit the govt and developers. Developers will still bid high land price for good location and sell high.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by proper-t
    Therein lies the beauty of their strategy..if they can succeed, they will effectively bring down the price of the private property sector without pissing off HDB owners or affecting HDB prices. Right now, our ppi doesn't differentiate between FH/LH transactions.

    they can then say with a straight face that ppi has come down x% just like they say that EP rejects have increased by 30%....
    Only during bad times, when there is a surplus of stocks, then freehold becomes the treasure. During good times, who cares 99 or freehold.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    I think old leasehold properties with 80+ years left will become more attractive to buyers when 60 yr leases become a norm in the coming years. If we are moving in the direction of allowing lease top ups for old projects like hk, then price depreciation of leasehold property will not be serious issue. For densely n highly populated old condos that have maximised plot ratio with the building in good condition, it would stand a better chance for lease top ups compared to old projects with few units that are better off to go the path of en bloc. If you guys are investing with the hope of increased plot ratio, best bet has to be the stretch of bukit timah condos where the downtown line runs through.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,763

    Default

    If 40% cheaper than similar 99LH... My bullet is loaded and ready to fire.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    If it takes 1/4 to 1/3 the time of the lease to break even from rental, yes, even a 60yr LH is investable.
    Quote Originally Posted by indomie
    If 40% cheaper than similar 99LH... My bullet is loaded and ready to fire.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,763

    Default

    If they sell 40% cheaper the yield would be incredible. If 99LH is 4%, the 60LH could double that (8%). In 12-15 years you would be breaking even.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    593

    Default

    wonder if after the 60 lh starts to take off (maybe in next 1 or 2 decades), will garmen start to find reasons to do forced land acquisition for all existing FHs so they can GLS it as 60lh parcels... scary thought.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vincegoh
    wonder if after the 60 lh starts to take off (maybe in next 1 or 2 decades), will garmen start to find reasons to do forced land acquisition for all existing FHs so they can GLS it as 60lh parcels... scary thought.
    Everything is possible, but now adays, the people are smarter and govt needs to compensate at market rate.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chestnut
    Everything is possible, but now adays, the people are smarter and govt needs to compensate at market rate.
    market rate may not be exactly market... just look at pearl centre.. most of them kbkb.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vincegoh
    market rate may not be exactly market... just look at pearl centre.. most of them kbkb.
    They suay because they were going for enbloc... this is the first time... but you are right. if there were very no transactions in the past 2 year, then price based on most recent transaction, so knock wall..

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vincegoh
    wonder if after the 60 lh starts to take off (maybe in next 1 or 2 decades), will garmen start to find reasons to do forced land acquisition for all existing FHs so they can GLS it as 60lh parcels... scary thought.
    wont one.... all the ministers staying in FH GCBs....

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,569

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by indomie
    If they sell 40% cheaper the yield would be incredible. If 99LH is 4%, the 60LH could double that (8%). In 12-15 years you would be breaking even.
    If they sell 40%, i will also buy. But you think they will? ..lol..
    maybe give you 1% spread.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    No matter what, it will have to be priced cheaper as long as there are comparable 99yrs LH in the vicinity. All things being equal, you would never pay the same price for a unit with a shorter leaselife.

    In short, a price ceiling is already there. Hence, if so many of you are already waiting on the sidelines to snap up the units, big bro would have achieve his objective of bringing down the property price index....

    obi wan has won his clone wars without even using his jedi mind trick!

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,763

    Default

    Let's say u buy 1000sqft 2 bed for 600K for 60LH. U pay 30% downpayment for 30 years loan. Monthly u pay 1500 repayment. U rent it for 3000, u are on positive gearing for 1500 a month.

Similar Threads

  1. You become what you feed your mind.
    By Arcachon in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 0
    -: 15-04-21, 10:07
  2. Money Mind | Property Investment 2021
    By Arcachon in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 30-03-21, 11:18
  3. What happens to property at end of lease?
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 12-04-17, 00:39
  4. What’s on the mind of property investors: 5 things everyone wants to know
    By vip in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 1
    -: 24-10-16, 16:35
  5. Construction stocks: keep the 3 S's in mind
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 1
    -: 30-06-08, 09:53

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •