Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Singaporean loses HDB flat as foreign wife runs away

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default Singaporean loses HDB flat as foreign wife runs away

    Billy (not his real name) is a 41 year old Singaporean male, who married a foreign spouse. After marrying him, she obtained permanent residency (PR) status. Subsequently, she left Singapore on a flight to Los Angeles in 2007, and has not been contactable since. Her PR status has also lapsed.

    As Billy has not been able to earn enough due to business failure to pay for his HDB 3-room resale flat mortgage, he has been served with a Notice of Vesting & To Take Possession. The compulsory acquisition compensation at 90 per cent of valuation is $229,000.

    However, according to Billy, the valuation for his flat is about $330,000, excluding cash-over-valuation (COV). Since his wife is a joint tenant of the flat, he is unable to sell or rent out his flat. She did not contribute a single cent for the flat or the household expenses.

    Despite numerous communications and appeals to the HDB, Legal Aid Bureau and his Member of Parliament (MP), his flat will now be repossessed on 16 May, as per the HDB's final communication to him on 2 May. Billy said "What's the point of everybody keep asking me to appeal, when I always face rejection all the time?"

    Because of the low acquisition compensation of $229,000, Billy is unable to buy even the cheapest resale 2-room flat in the open market. If he can get his flat's current valuation of about $330,000 plus COV, it is likely that he may be able to buy a resale 2-room flat.

    Recently, Billy was denied his right to vote in the Home Improvement Programme (HIP) for his block, as the letter said that: "Please note that you are not eligible to vote because you are served the Notice of Intention due to mortgage arrears." "However, you will be required to pay the cost of the HIP and LUP works if the poll for the HIP and LUP works are successful."

    /toc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    Such is the sad story of Singapore middle class ... when things go wrong ... the system has no mercy
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carbuncle
    Billy (not his real name) is a 41 year old Singaporean male, who married a foreign spouse. After marrying him, she obtained permanent residency (PR) status. Subsequently, she left Singapore on a flight to Los Angeles in 2007, and has not been contactable since. Her PR status has also lapsed.

    As Billy has not been able to earn enough due to business failure to pay for his HDB 3-room resale flat mortgage, he has been served with a Notice of Vesting & To Take Possession. The compulsory acquisition compensation at 90 per cent of valuation is $229,000.

    However, according to Billy, the valuation for his flat is about $330,000, excluding cash-over-valuation (COV). Since his wife is a joint tenant of the flat, he is unable to sell or rent out his flat. She did not contribute a single cent for the flat or the household expenses.

    Despite numerous communications and appeals to the HDB, Legal Aid Bureau and his Member of Parliament (MP), his flat will now be repossessed on 16 May, as per the HDB's final communication to him on 2 May. Billy said "What's the point of everybody keep asking me to appeal, when I always face rejection all the time?"

    Because of the low acquisition compensation of $229,000, Billy is unable to buy even the cheapest resale 2-room flat in the open market. If he can get his flat's current valuation of about $330,000 plus COV, it is likely that he may be able to buy a resale 2-room flat.

    Recently, Billy was denied his right to vote in the Home Improvement Programme (HIP) for his block, as the letter said that: "Please note that you are not eligible to vote because you are served the Notice of Intention due to mortgage arrears." "However, you will be required to pay the cost of the HIP and LUP works if the poll for the HIP and LUP works are successful."

    /toc
    Moral of the story -

    as HDB flat Owner plse note you are just as lessee of your half-million $$ flat for 99 years and HDB being the lessor (landlord) - own your pigeon hole even after you are settled all your outstanding 30 years loan. You don't own any strata or title deed. You only have a copy of a mortgage deed after you settled your loan. HDB can throw you out if you violate the rules eg illegal sub-subletting etc. But funny thing is that you still pay maintenance for your landlord ...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,006

    Default

    this is really a sad story. he has a kid? Could he rent out one room and still secure the flat for self stay?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    I have a diff point of view on this. How can his own valuation vs the official assignee differ so much?

    With 229k he can't get anything decent? I seriously doubt so.... 330k 3rm is for those matured hot locations isnt it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,036

    Default

    tot such case is very rare. HDB will not repossess unless really needed. tats why so many flat owner continue to stay there even they cannot afford. if such thing happen and resulted someone to be homeless and is in media. govt sure kana hamtam by opposition for not showing mercy.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,571

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ay123
    tot such case is very rare. HDB will not repossess unless really needed. tats why so many flat owner continue to stay there even they cannot afford. if such thing happen and resulted someone to be homeless and is in media. govt sure kana hamtam by opposition for not showing mercy.
    Should call New Paper to cover his story if this is true. Get some publicity, see MP. With that, HDB may have to scrutinise the case carefully, and help him with some interim solution...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    ~ By Leong Sze Hian ~

    Sorry forgot to credit the writer. Taken from TOC

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carbuncle

    Because of the low acquisition compensation of $229,000, Billy is unable to buy even the cheapest resale 2-room flat in the open market. If he can get his flat's current valuation of about $330,000 plus COV, it is likely that he may be able to buy a resale 2-room flat.

    /toc

    $229,000 is definitely way below value for a 3 room flat in the current market. Wonder how HDB came about with the figure.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Keh
    $229,000 is definitely way below value for a 3 room flat in the current market. Wonder how HDB came about with the figure.
    U r right. I did a quick search on propguru and most are like 275k and abv

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,438

    Default

    If HDB allow him to make decision, how are they going to answer to the wife if she comes back?

    Many people are saying HDB heartless but this is our law. If we bend the law for this case, then Singapore will lose the credibility.

    And no case by case basis. The wife own half, period. Even 1% ownership, cannot sell means cannot sell. And who ask this man to earn so little until cannot afford to pay? Do business is like this one. High risk, high gain. He can work 2 jobs and can still pay his installment. I don't see what is the problem. Looks like a lazy man complaining here.




    Quote Originally Posted by carbuncle
    Billy (not his real name) is a 41 year old Singaporean male, who married a foreign spouse. After marrying him, she obtained permanent residency (PR) status. Subsequently, she left Singapore on a flight to Los Angeles in 2007, and has not been contactable since. Her PR status has also lapsed.

    As Billy has not been able to earn enough due to business failure to pay for his HDB 3-room resale flat mortgage, he has been served with a Notice of Vesting & To Take Possession. The compulsory acquisition compensation at 90 per cent of valuation is $229,000.

    However, according to Billy, the valuation for his flat is about $330,000, excluding cash-over-valuation (COV). Since his wife is a joint tenant of the flat, he is unable to sell or rent out his flat. She did not contribute a single cent for the flat or the household expenses.

    Despite numerous communications and appeals to the HDB, Legal Aid Bureau and his Member of Parliament (MP), his flat will now be repossessed on 16 May, as per the HDB's final communication to him on 2 May. Billy said "What's the point of everybody keep asking me to appeal, when I always face rejection all the time?"

    Because of the low acquisition compensation of $229,000, Billy is unable to buy even the cheapest resale 2-room flat in the open market. If he can get his flat's current valuation of about $330,000 plus COV, it is likely that he may be able to buy a resale 2-room flat.

    Recently, Billy was denied his right to vote in the Home Improvement Programme (HIP) for his block, as the letter said that: "Please note that you are not eligible to vote because you are served the Notice of Intention due to mortgage arrears." "However, you will be required to pay the cost of the HIP and LUP works if the poll for the HIP and LUP works are successful."

    /toc

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thomastansb
    If HDB allow him to make decision, how are they going to answer to the wife if she comes back?

    Many people are saying HDB heartless but this is our law. If we bend the law for this case, then Singapore will lose the credibility.

    And no case by case basis. The wife own half, period. Even 1% ownership, cannot sell means cannot sell. And who ask this man to earn so little until cannot afford to pay? Do business is like this one. High risk, high gain. He can work 2 jobs and can still pay his installment. I don't see what is the problem. Looks like a lazy man complaining here.
    He still earns if e flat is BTO. HDB is prob scare of pp using foreign spouse to make $ from HDB i.e. fake marriages.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Keh
    $229,000 is definitely way below value for a 3 room flat in the current market. Wonder how HDB came about with the figure.
    $229k is 90% of valuation.... ie. valuation should be abt $255k... without COV is that very far off from market value?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hyenergix
    He still earns if e flat is BTO. HDB is prob scare of pp using foreign spouse to make $ from HDB i.e. fake marriages.
    Precisely... there is no mention of how much he paid for it. We don't know the full picture.. it could be that he thought he could pull a fast one with HDB with a fake marriage in order to secure a HDB flat

    A lot of missing info in the story deliberately to paint HDB in a bad light... I believe nobody has ever been evicted from HDB for arrears in mortgage...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howgozit
    $229k is 90% of valuation.... ie. valuation should be abt $255k... without COV is that very far off from market value?
    U r right. Thats why i stated earlier this writeup abit fishy.... Plus u knw la come from TOC mostly is left wing

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    -: 27-09-21, 15:27
  2. Replies: 2
    -: 27-07-20, 10:45
  3. What happens if one day the Government runs out of sites?
    By Kelonguni in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 36
    -: 02-05-15, 22:35
  4. Non-residential units: Foreign interest flat
    By reporter2 in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 07-06-12, 14:44
  5. Foreigner runs cheap hotel from new HDB flat
    By PN in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 18
    -: 14-02-12, 15:34

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •