Page 90 of 148 FirstFirst ... 60657075808586878889909192939495100105110115120 ... LastLast
Results 2,671 to 2,700 of 4428

Thread: A few CCR transactions sold at a loss (reported in The Edge)

  1. #2671
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    I'm sure Lippo will have something But since Mr Wee's QC believes there is a case, then he must have in possession something incriminating.

  2. #2672
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    u also watched to many tvb dramas hahahahahahhaha.

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    I'm sure Lippo will have something But since Mr Wee's QC believes there is a case, then he must have in possession something incriminating.

  3. #2673
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Urban Suites

    Sold 30 DEC 2014 3 HULLET ROAD #16-06 1,044sq ft 2,682psf
    Bought 18 JAN 2010 2,765psf

    small loss

  4. #2674
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Orchard Residences

    Sold 2 JAN 2015 238 ORCHARD BOULEVARD #36-06 1,808sq ft 3,041psf
    Boought 1 NOV 2007 4,287psf

    about 2.5m in losses.

    stack 6 3 bedder seems to be the worst investment for this project. 6 of the 8 losses recorded for this project, including the last 4 have been from stack 06.

    however, prices have not fallen much since august when #37-06 was transacted at 3097psf.

  5. #2675
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    there are some mortgagee sales where the buyers had bought really cheap eons ago. why can't they sell it in open market? anyone can shed some light on the reasons for these mortgagee sales?

    e.g at JLL's auction on 29th Jan alone:
    Ville Royale

    23 SEP 2003 312 RIVER VALLEY ROAD #01-06 1,389sq ft 652psf $905,000

    JLL's advert price $1.808m

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...e-ville-royale

    twin regency

    24 APR 2007 26 KIM TIAN ROAD #22-01 1,776sq ft 1,070psf $1,900,000

    JLL advert price 3.1m

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...e-twin-regency



    non CCR:
    High Oak
    17 FEB 2006 11 TOH TUCK ROAD #02-42 1,206sq ft 440psf $530,640
    JLL advert price $1.1m
    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...high-oak-condo



    as well as properties bought in 2012/2013, why so soon kenna mortgagee sales? had noticed a few units purchased in 2013 and went under the hammer in 2014 as mortgagee sales.

    in this auction, non CCR:
    The Quintet

    13 APR 2012 38 CHOA CHU KANG STREET 64 #14-06 1,259sq ft 715psf $900,000
    JLL advertised price $1.02m

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...le-the-quintet



    elias green:

    21 JUN 2013 5 ELIAS GREEN #02-06 1,507sq ft 597psf $900,000

  6. #2676
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    390

    Default

    if the question is why the banks cannot just sell the property in the open mkt, the reason is that under law they have a duty when exercising the mortgagee right to sale to obtain a fair market value. and auction is regarded as the most undisputable way to do this.

    if the question is why the owners cannot sell the property instead of ending up with the bank repossessing the property, i can only hazard a guess. it could be because the property is pledged as collateral for a larger commercial loan. or it could have been refinanced and owner has drawn out equity based on valuation at the peak of the market.

  7. #2677
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    genuinely in trouble:
    The Grange

    2 MAY 2008 3 GRANGE GARDEN #17-03 2,303sq ft 2,692psf $6,200,000

    JLL dvert price $4.86m

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...ale-the-grange

  8. #2678
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    i see, makes sense. i m too amateur, never drawn out equity before. lol. i understand that this practice is now banned. do u know which year? only in mid 2013 TDSR or was it before that?

    Quote Originally Posted by smellyfish View Post
    if the question is why the banks cannot just sell the property in the open mkt, the reason is that under law they have a duty when exercising the mortgagee right to sale to obtain a fair market value. and auction is regarded as the most undisputable way to do this.

    if the question is why the owners cannot sell the property instead of ending up with the bank repossessing the property, i can only hazard a guess. it could be because the property is pledged as collateral for a larger commercial loan. or it could have been refinanced and owner has drawn out equity based on valuation at the peak of the market.

  9. #2679
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    anyway, happy shopping everyone. seems like bargains galore.

  10. #2680
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    390

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    i see, makes sense. i m too amateur, never drawn out equity before. lol. i understand that this practice is now banned. do u know which year? only in mid 2013 TDSR or was it before that?
    i dont think it was ever outright banned. just rendered undoable for most people because of the LTV changes plus TDSR.

  11. #2681
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    390

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    anyway, happy shopping everyone. seems like bargains galore.
    still at the >$4m bracket leh.

    still looking for bargains at the CCR, >1400 sf, comfy 3 bedder, +/- $2m bracket

  12. #2682
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    still no bargains at this level lor. still "affordable"

    Quote Originally Posted by smellyfish View Post
    still at the >$4m bracket leh.

    still looking for bargains at the CCR, >1400 sf, comfy 3 bedder, +/- $2m bracket

  13. #2683
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    201

    Default

    i saw some units being advertised at D9 cairnhill/river valley for about $2000psf...quantum less than $2.3-2.9M. what is a good price/psf to aim for?

  14. #2684
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    depends on each unit's characteristics, hard to generalise.

    combination of size of unit and quantum decides the psf.

    for the units our bro smellyfish is looking at, around 1400 sq ft, last year, at tribeca i think there was one unit which transacted at 2.3m+, which was 1600psf+. at this point, i think there are buyers.

    Quote Originally Posted by cartman View Post
    i saw some units being advertised at D9 cairnhill/river valley for about $2000psf...quantum less than $2.3-2.9M. what is a good price/psf to aim for?

  15. #2685
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    depends on each unit's characteristics, hard to generalise.

    combination of size of unit and quantum decides the psf.

    for the units our bro smellyfish is looking at, around 1400 sq ft, last year, at tribeca i think there was one unit which transacted at 2.3m+, which was 1600psf+. at this point, i think there are buyers.
    That unit was a starbuy as the owner was very willing to sell. I remembered that it was sold within a few days as I was overseas during that time and could not view it. Moving forward (2H2015), premium D9 units at the 2000 sqft mark should be going for bargains (1500-2000 psf) in the market. Lets all wait patiently.

  16. #2686
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    think 1500 a bit tough, unless its those outsized unit, ie 3 bedder > 1700 sq ft, 4 bedder > 2200 sq ft kind. i think 1600psf could be the lower end of the band.

    how much do u think that mortgagee sale for 2303 sq ft at the grange can fetch? 2000psf? 4.61m? #05 of another stack was sold at super knock down price of 1832psf (4.2m) but i think for this high floor unit, should be able to find buyers at 2000psf.



    Quote Originally Posted by bullman View Post
    That unit was a starbuy as the owner was very willing to sell. I remembered that it was sold within a few days as I was overseas during that time and could not view it. Moving forward (2H2015), premium D9 units at the 2000 sqft mark should be going for bargains (1500-2000 psf) in the market. Lets all wait patiently.

  17. #2687
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    OCR should have lots of bargain going forward... Don't need to buy now at those inflated price...

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    anyway, happy shopping everyone. seems like bargains galore.

  18. #2688
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    think 1500 a bit tough, unless its those outsized unit, ie 3 bedder > 1700 sq ft, 4 bedder > 2200 sq ft kind. i think 1600psf could be the lower end of the band.

    how much do u think that mortgagee sale for 2303 sq ft at the grange can fetch? 2000psf? 4.61m? #05 of another stack was sold at super knock down price of 1832psf (4.2m) but i think for this high floor unit, should be able to find buyers at 2000psf.
    This unit could be quite difficult to sell given the current climate. The other unit was sold at a time whereby there were still opportunistic investors around. I can only say that I will pay around 1800 Psf for this unit after factoring the "risk" of loading this unit into my portfolio at this moment. That being said, I will not buy anymore till the ABSD is lifted.

  19. #2689
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    that's for sure. but no harm lowballing for these few OCR mortgagee sales.

    Quote Originally Posted by teddybear View Post
    OCR should have lots of bargain going forward... Don't need to buy now at those inflated price...

  20. #2690
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    let's see how it goes at the auction. anyone who is attending please update as i am not sure if i am free to attend yet.

    but feels like there are still opportunistic investors around.

    for bidders to reference (caveats lodged for transactions >$3m in dec and jan so far):

    D9

    9 JAN 2015 9 NOMU 20 HANDY ROAD #10-03 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 1,389sq ft STRATA 2,434psf $3,380,000


    2 JAN 2015 9 THE ORCHARD RESIDENCES 238 ORCHARD BOULEVARD #36-06 APARTMENT 99 YRS FROM 2006 1,808sq ft STRATA 3,041psf $5,500,000

    2 JAN 2015 9 THE COSMOPOLITAN 202 KIM SENG ROAD #31-07 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 1,679sq ft STRATA 1,935psf $3,250,000

    15 DEC 2014 9 RIVERGATE 93 ROBERTSON QUAY #16-03 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 1,604sq ft STRATA 1,983psf $3,180,000

    15 DEC 2014 9 THE METZ 83 DEVONSHIRE ROAD #27-03 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 3,240sq ft STRATA 1,852psf $6,000,000

    10 DEC 2014 9 ST THOMAS SUITES 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 4,672sq ft STRATA 1,552psf $7,250,000

    5 DEC 2014 9 GRANGE HEIGHTS 15 ST. THOMAS WALK #09-15 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 3,003sq ft STRATA 1,292psf $3,880,000


    3 DEC 2014 9 THONG SIA BUILDING 30 BIDEFORD ROAD #20-02 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 2,034sq ft STRATA 1,720psf $3,500,000

    1 DEC 2014 9 PATERSON RESIDENCE 73 PATERSON ROAD CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 4,123sq ft STRATA 1,552psf $6,400,000

    (does not include 4 Residences at emerald hill units which i believe are related party transactions to boss' wife)

    D10

    7 JAN 2015 10 HALLMARK RESIDENCES 17 EWE BOON ROAD #11-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 3,681sq ft STRATA 1,589psf $5,850,000

    30 DEC 2014 10 THE TOMLINSON 20 CUSCADEN ROAD #03-02 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 2,368sq ft STRATA 2,111psf $5,000,000 in particular, surely the grange on mortgagee sale unit is at least equal or superior to this unit? (i do not know how the ultra rich thinks, they may like tomlinson more than grange even though this project sits on a small plot of land and is low floor)

    22 DEC 2014 10 THE TRIZON 6 RIDGEWOOD CLOSE #20-05 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,067sq ft STRATA 1,452psf $3,000,000

    19 DEC 2014 10 THE TESSARINA 22 WILBY ROAD #09-17 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 3,358sq ft STRATA 1,221psf $4,100,000

    19 DEC 2014 10 DRAYCOTT EIGHT 10 DRAYCOTT PARK #10-08 CONDOMINIUM 99 YRS FROM 1997 2,863sq ft STRATA 2,008psf $5,750,000

    18 DEC 2014 10 THE GRANGE 1 GRANGE GARDEN #16-04 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 1,744sq ft STRATA 2,036psf $3,550,000

    18 DEC 2014 10 BOTANIKA 50 HOLLAND ROAD #01-07 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 1,636sq ft STRATA 1,956psf $3,200,000

    16 DEC 2014 10 GOODWOOD RESIDENCE 263 BUKIT TIMAH ROAD #04-09 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,497sq ft STRATA 2,627psf $6,560,300

    15 DEC 2014 10 THE GRANGE 3 GRANGE GARDEN #05-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,293sq ft STRATA 1,832psf $4,200,000

    12 DEC 2014 10 NASSIM PARK RESIDENCES 21 NASSIM ROAD #04-19 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 3,477sq ft STRATA 3,940psf $13,700,000

    11 DEC 2014 10 NASSIM MANSION 32 NASSIM HILL #02-36 APARTMENT FREEHOLD 2,852sq ft STRATA 2,932psf $8,362,500

    10 DEC 2014 10 GALLOP GREEN 19 WOOLLERTON PARK #04-21 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 3,272sq ft STRATA 1,780psf $5,824,160

    8 DEC 2014 10 D'LEEDON 15 LEEDON HEIGHTS #32-54 CONDOMINIUM 99 YRS FROM 2010 2,422sq ft STRATA 1,551psf $3,756,300

    8 DEC 2014 10 ORANGE GROVE RESIDENCES 31 ORANGE GROVE ROAD #01-05 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,400sq ft STRATA 1,875psf $4,500,000

    8 DEC 2014 10 ARDMORE PARK 9 ARDMORE PARK #04-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,885sq ft STRATA 2,600psf $7,500,000

    8 DEC 2014 10 ARDMORE PARK 9 ARDMORE PARK #04-02 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,885sq ft STRATA 2,808psf $8,100,000

    1 DEC 2014 10 GOODWOOD RESIDENCE 261 BUKIT TIMAH ROAD #04-07 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 1,970sq ft STRATA 2,442psf $4,810,000
    Quote Originally Posted by bullman View Post
    This unit could be quite difficult to sell given the current climate. The other unit was sold at a time whereby there were still opportunistic investors around. I can only say that I will pay around 1800 Psf for this unit after factoring the "risk" of loading this unit into my portfolio at this moment. That being said, I will not buy anymore till the ABSD is lifted.

  21. #2691
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    slightly off-topic, but interesting nonetheless: dun expect "firesale" price cuts for Keppel's Reflections/Corals, because :

    "the Keppel Bay land plots are exempted from QC taxes, having been granted a special status by the government because they are deemed "specifically tailored to entice foreigners purchasers".

    Keppel is bluer than Capitaland !

  22. #2692
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    since we r on the topic of QC taxes

    https://www.squarefoot.com.sg/phocad...buy-or-pay.pdf

    from the list,

    perhaps interlace and d'leedon may cut prices but both projects seem to have sold well since the jan 2013 super price cut and prices have actually trended up since.

    only iliv@grange is under threat it seems, they are still trying to find that elusive single buyer.

    one of the reasons listed for privatising popular is the poor sales of 8 raja. think boss doesn't want to sell it cheap either.

    Goodwood Resi, Marina Bay Suites and Urban Resort still seems to be able to sell a unit here and there to the well-heeled?

    i don't see many projects which have an urgent need to cut prices leh.

    for those TOP in 2014 (developer can worry about it next year),

    the more vulnerable ones are: Concourse Skyline, Waterscape, Le Nouvel Ardmore, Tomlinson Heights, The Peak @ Cairnhill I.

    very few units left for Foresque and Lincoln Suites to worry the developers.




    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    slightly off-topic, but interesting nonetheless: dun expect "firesale" price cuts for Keppel's Reflections/Corals, because :

    "the Keppel Bay land plots are exempted from QC taxes, having been granted a special status by the government because they are deemed "specifically tailored to entice foreigners purchasers".

    Keppel is bluer than Capitaland !

  23. #2693
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    slightly off-topic, but interesting nonetheless: dun expect "firesale" price cuts for Keppel's Reflections/Corals, because :

    "the Keppel Bay land plots are exempted from QC taxes, having been granted a special status by the government because they are deemed "specifically tailored to entice foreigners purchasers".

    Keppel is bluer than Capitaland !
    The article also said that the Keppel Bay land plots are exempted from Qualifying Certificate taxes because they have been granted a special status by the government. This is inaccurate. They are exempted as the land was acquired before the revision to the Residential Property Act in July 2005. The article has been amended to reflect this.

  24. #2694
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    just as we were discussing the QC Tax,

    Capitaland sold these 4 high floor units with price cuts and set new psf lows for this project. in comparison #11-01 was sold at 2702psf in Jul 2013. even earlier, #16-02 of the same size set the record psf for this project at 3208psf in may 2011. comparing that with #16-01's psf is a -28.6% drop.

    12 JAN 2015 9 URBAN RESORT CONDOMINIUM 32 CAIRNHILL ROAD #17-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,121sq ft STRATA 2,312psf $4,902,000
    12 JAN 2015 9 URBAN RESORT CONDOMINIUM 32 CAIRNHILL ROAD #15-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,121sq ft STRATA 2,270psf $4,814,000
    12 JAN 2015 9 URBAN RESORT CONDOMINIUM 32 CAIRNHILL ROAD #16-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,121sq ft STRATA 2,291psf $4,858,000
    12 JAN 2015 9 URBAN RESORT CONDOMINIUM 32 CAIRNHILL ROAD #13-01 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 2,121sq ft STRATA 2,229psf $4,726,000

  25. #2695
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    390

    Default

    really dangerous to be earlier buyers of capitaland products....

  26. #2696
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    ok lah, for interlace, the earliest buyers were never out of the money.

    Quote Originally Posted by smellyfish View Post
    really dangerous to be earlier buyers of capitaland products....

  27. #2697
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    news just in: Keppel Corp is taking Keppel Land private !!

  28. #2698
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    693

    Default

    becoming like a trend starting from Simon Cheong.. is this for the same reason?

  29. #2699
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    doesn't look like it. as highlighted, most of kepland's ppties are not affected by QC tax. only marina bay suites it seems and there aren't that many units to sell for that.

    kepcorp's oil biz is slowing and kepland as a whole still good value?

    Quote Originally Posted by stl67 View Post
    becoming like a trend starting from Simon Cheong.. is this for the same reason?

  30. #2700
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    doesn't look like it. as highlighted, most of kepland's ppties are not affected by QC tax. only marina bay suites it seems and there aren't that many units to sell for that.

    kepcorp's oil biz is slowing and kepland as a whole still good value?
    They also have Highline residences and The Glades.

Similar Threads

  1. Proportion of loss-making transactions in resale market up in November
    By New Reporter in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 28-12-20, 21:35
  2. A few RCR transactions sold at a loss
    By wannabe in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 12
    -: 22-07-16, 17:21
  3. St REGIS: Sold for $15.8 mio loss
    By gsmsimmax3 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 11
    -: 18-03-15, 16:26
  4. More private properties being sold at a loss
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 05-02-15, 16:05
  5. Any RCR transaction sold at loss yet?
    By Poloclub in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 5
    -: 23-03-12, 00:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •