Page 89 of 148 FirstFirst ... 5964697479848586878889909192939499104109114119 ... LastLast
Results 2,641 to 2,670 of 4428

Thread: A few CCR transactions sold at a loss (reported in The Edge)

  1. #2641
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Orange Grove Residences

    Sold 8 DEC 2014 31 ORANGE GROVE ROAD #01-05 2,400sq ft 1,875psf
    Bought 14 FEB 2007 2,118psf

    This project has 1 profitable vs 9 unprofitable transactions already.

  2. #2642
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Interestingly, for the St Thomas Suites duplex, the only buyer who seriously overpaid was the current seller. The seller who sold it to him also held it for the shortest period and "huatted" the most. We are back to around early 2007 launch prices for this big unit.

    10 DEC 2014 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672sq ft 1,552psf $7,250,000
    29 DEC 2010 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672sq ft 2,213psf $10,338,000
    7 SEP 2009 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672sq ft 1,670psf $7,800,000
    16 FEB 2007 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672 sq ft 1,578psf $7,374,000

  3. #2643
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    Interestingly, for the St Thomas Suites duplex, the only buyer who seriously overpaid was the current seller. The seller who sold it to him also held it for the shortest period and "huatted" the most. We are back to around early 2007 launch prices for this big unit.

    10 DEC 2014 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672sq ft 1,552psf $7,250,000
    29 DEC 2010 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672sq ft 2,213psf $10,338,000
    7 SEP 2009 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672sq ft 1,670psf $7,800,000
    16 FEB 2007 31 ST. THOMAS WALK #29-01 4,672 sq ft 1,578psf $7,374,000
    Not sure why seller so desperate to sell at such steep loss? Recession coming?

    I was told someone also sold their apt at grange heights at steep loss too... Already caveats but I am not sure of their purchase price cos I do not have their unit no. .Can check? I heard loss $500k...I heard seller said just sell wor...

  4. #2644
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    actually for the st thomas suites unit, i view it as an overextended buyer cutting loss.

    http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...-thomas-suites

    seller asked for 8.8m but done at 7.25m. from the pictures, the decor seems to indicate self stay?

    for grange heights, the latest transaction was for:

    5 DEC 2014 15 ST. THOMAS WALK #09-15 RESALE 3,003sq ft STRATA 1,292psf $3,880,000 HDB

    no prior caveat was lodged because they just changed "address" haha from grange road to st thomas walk after they were finally cut off from grange road. anyway, the unit was similarly bought during the 2nd/final CCR bull run wave in 2010, just before the 13 Jan 2011 SSD measures started the end of the prime bull.

    7 DEC 2010 15 GRANGE ROAD #09-15 RESALE 3,003sq ft STRATA 1,415psf $4,250,000 PRIVATE

    i would not consider this as "steep loss", merely 8.7% leh. and the 3.88m price is similar to recent transactions. there are a few drawbacks of grange heights despite the nice big size and low psf:

    1) 3003 sq ft split into 3 levels.
    2) you need to climb up a few stairs to go from master bedroom to the master toilet. after you climb those 2 or 3 steps, if u r taller than 1.8m, u will have to bend down to avoid hitting your head on the top of the door frame.
    3) becoz of the above and the age of the development, rental is low. really quite wasted, could have been a really nice development (the development is not poorly maintained).

    Quote Originally Posted by Werther View Post
    Not sure why seller so desperate to sell at such steep loss? Recession coming?

    I was told someone also sold their apt at grange heights at steep loss too... Already caveats but I am not sure of their purchase price cos I do not have their unit no. .Can check? I heard loss $500k...I heard seller said just sell wor...

  5. #2645
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Werther View Post
    Not sure why seller so desperate to sell at such steep loss? Recession coming?

    I was told someone also sold their apt at grange heights at steep loss too... Already caveats but I am not sure of their purchase price cos I do not have their unit no. .Can check? I heard loss $500k...I heard seller said just sell wor...

    I'm surprised with the price paid in 2010. Are there any transactions after 29 DEC 2010? Why did he pay a 25% premium over the last purchase less than a year ago?
    狮子王 (formerly blackjack21trader): READ MY LIPS: NO MORE CRASH FOR 60 YEARS.

  6. #2646
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    I noticed all these sellers starts selling after they hit 4 years....so no need to pay tax?

  7. #2647
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    yup. precisely. overpaid. but then again, penthouses have been volatile especially in recent years. 07 peak and late 2010 mini peak, rich buyers were keen to pay HIGHER psf for these big units. this buyer better hope he would never have to sell:

    19 SEP 2011 33 ST. THOMAS WALK #33-05 RESALE 7,685sq ft STRATA 2,905psf $22,330,000 PRIVATE

    and in current times, if like the recent sale, urgently need to sell, then no choice, the volatility swings the other way and a severe discount of psf off standard units are required. 2014 average is 1882psf, that duplex sold for 1552psf.



    Quote Originally Posted by sgbuyer View Post
    I'm surprised with the price paid in 2010. Are there any transactions after 29 DEC 2010? Why did he pay a 25% premium over the last purchase less than a year ago?

  8. #2648
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    yup. precisely. overpaid. but then again, penthouses have been volatile especially in recent years. 07 peak and late 2010 mini peak, rich buyers were keen to pay HIGHER psf for these big units. this buyer better hope he would never have to sell:

    19 SEP 2011 33 ST. THOMAS WALK #33-05 RESALE 7,685sq ft STRATA 2,905psf $22,330,000 PRIVATE

    and in current times, if like the recent sale, urgently need to sell, then no choice, the volatility swings the other way and a severe discount of psf off standard units are required. 2014 average is 1882psf, that duplex sold for 1552psf.

    $22M for a condo!
    狮子王 (formerly blackjack21trader): READ MY LIPS: NO MORE CRASH FOR 60 YEARS.

  9. #2649
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    nope. all units bought before 13 Jan 2011 are not subjected to the SSD. For those units bought in 2011, they can sell next year without having to pay SSD. expect some cut losses. after that, CCR had visibly cooled so I'm not expecting a lot more cut losses for from the 2012 to 2014 purchases from 2016 onwards.




    Quote Originally Posted by Werther View Post
    I noticed all these sellers starts selling after they hit 4 years....so no need to pay tax?

  10. #2650
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    another nice penthouse sold:

    15 DEC 2014 9 THE METZ 83 DEVONSHIRE ROAD #27-03 CONDOMINIUM FREEHOLD 3,240sq ft STRATA 1,852psf $6,000,000

    nice purchase price at the right time: 2 NOV 2005 1,250psf

    still made an almost 2m profit despite a 1m discount off asking price: http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/listi...-sale-the-metz

  11. #2651
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Nassim Park Resi

    Sold 12 DEC 2014 21 NASSIM ROAD #04-19 3,477sq ft 3,940psf
    Bought 5 JAN 2011 3,833psf

    couldn't cover stamp duty.

  12. #2652
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    not a loss transaction but some points to highlight:
    Melrose Park

    Sold 28 NOV 2014 91 KELLOCK ROAD #05-02 1,701sq ft 1,558psf
    Bought 19 APR 1999 911psf

    took awhile, was first advertised at $3m and above more than half a year ago.
    buyer came in at probably what is viewed as a fair price
    seller had bought real low just after/still during the asian financial crisis at a significantly lower psf and taking profit. 5 adverts remained despite unit having been sold in end nov but caveat only first spotted today. http://www.propertyguru.com.sg/proje...=psf&order=asc

  13. #2653
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    Botanika

    Sold 18 DEC 2014 50 HOLLAND ROAD #01-07 1,636sq ft 1,956psf
    Bought 16 APR 2007 2,037psf

  14. #2654
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    bro teddy, u gave up waiting for paterson residence to come down some more and bought at market price?

    25 NOV 2014 83 PATERSON ROAD #16-01 RESALE 1,313 STRATA 2,117 2,780,000 PRIVATE

  15. #2655
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    Got high floor stack 6 for sale? I only like Stack 6 (quiet view and overlooking swimming pool)...


    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    bro teddy, u gave up waiting for paterson residence to come down some more and bought at market price?

    25 NOV 2014 83 PATERSON ROAD #16-01 RESALE 1,313 STRATA 2,117 2,780,000 PRIVATE

  16. #2656
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Not sure if it is a polite question to ask but what is the best way to look for these bargains? I search Internet everyday, go to auctions dun seem to find such gems leh...

  17. #2657
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    which gems are you referring to? earlier this year, i had highlighted several bargains which were for sale for the longest time. they were advertised on propertyguru for many months with no takers. in recent months, i also felt that there has been a slight pick up in buying activity which cleared these bargains. i agree that there aren't many bargains advertised on propertyguru at this point. the newspapers have highlighted that there would be more mortgagee auctions next year. do attend them and look out for them.

    i noticed some mortgagee sales are NOT at bargain prices. they seem less urgent than others. so please do your homework.


    Quote Originally Posted by art10626 View Post
    Not sure if it is a polite question to ask but what is the best way to look for these bargains? I search Internet everyday, go to auctions dun seem to find such gems leh...

  18. #2658
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,217

    Default

    Decision on selling properties will be more firm after fed meeting in late jan 2015 on rates normalization.
    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    which gems are you referring to? earlier this year, i had highlighted several bargains which were for sale for the longest time. they were advertised on propertyguru for many months with no takers. in recent months, i also felt that there has been a slight pick up in buying activity which cleared these bargains. i agree that there aren't many bargains advertised on propertyguru at this point. the newspapers have highlighted that there would be more mortgagee auctions next year. do attend them and look out for them.

    i noticed some mortgagee sales are NOT at bargain prices. they seem less urgent than others. so please do your homework.

  19. #2659
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Thanks bargain hunter and DC33_2008! Will keep doing homework and pay rental for another year!

  20. #2660
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    http://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/slw/...utm_medium=rss

    wow wow wow, zero cash upfront does exist in sg. hahahahahahahahahahaha. not only zero cash upfront, get cash back when buy property!

  21. #2661
    teddybear's Avatar
    teddybear is offline Global recession is coming....
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10,800

    Default

    I already mentioned something like that in this forum - developers engaged in all kind tactics and cash back like furniture vouchers and renovation vouchers and ABSD rebates etc! BUT Govt not doing anything about it...


    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    http://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/slw/...utm_medium=rss

    wow wow wow, zero cash upfront does exist in sg. hahahahahahahahahahaha. not only zero cash upfront, get cash back when buy property!

  22. #2662
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teddybear View Post
    I already mentioned something like that in this forum - developers engaged in all kind tactics and cash back like furniture vouchers and renovation vouchers and ABSD rebates etc! BUT Govt not doing anything about it...
    Sounded more like property agent scamming greedy banker and desperate developer. Mastermind should be the property agent not the developer

  23. #2663
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    this is a very interesting case. I wonder how UOB can grant a loan so easily for a mere 200k deposit (I guess that is to qualify as priority status). at 6mil list price, loan is at 4.8mil, that's abt 15k mortgage even at low rate time. you have to show your income can support such payment. Did these "proxies" show they have the income to support that ? If they dun, then the bank is overly lenient.
    I feel no one is innocent here. The seller (developer) close one eye on the "massive" discount request. Now legally see who can fight better. UOB one is senior counsel I think.

  24. #2664
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    lippo likely to get away with it and the 7 individuals, see who is made the scapegoat lor?

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    this is a very interesting case. I wonder how UOB can grant a loan so easily for a mere 200k deposit (I guess that is to qualify as priority status). at 6mil list price, loan is at 4.8mil, that's abt 15k mortgage even at low rate time. you have to show your income can support such payment. Did these "proxies" show they have the income to support that ? If they dun, then the bank is overly lenient.
    I feel no one is innocent here. The seller (developer) close one eye on the "massive" discount request. Now legally see who can fight better. UOB one is senior counsel I think.

  25. #2665
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    some high ranking UOB banker may also have allowed the loans to be granted leniently? sorry, been watching too many TVB dramas hahahahahahaha.

  26. #2666

    Default

    181 millions suit.....hope this will not impact to its reit performance.

  27. #2667
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    273

    Default Intersting Thread

    I am waiting for the final conclusion of this case

  28. #2668

    Default

    I think it will take some time since uob and lippo are involved.

  29. #2669
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter View Post
    lippo likely to get away with it and the 7 individuals, see who is made the scapegoat lor?
    actually I have a diff view. Lippo can be sued for "facilitating a cheat" on a bank. UOB's loan approval process is an internal issue, at most MAS reprimand UOB for "lack of due diligence". But for Lippo, acting blur on this obvious cash back scheme cannot constitute as a defence. The bank has no means of knowing the cash back, the seller has.

    clearly UOB is going after Lippo for the money... chasing a few individuals will not help the bottom line.

  30. #2670
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    during the 2011 to 2013 period, the caveats were consistently lodged at 2800psf or thereabouts, similar to the 2007/2008 peaks. can that help lippo argue their ignorance?

    i mean, surely lippo must have some defence instead of committing such an obviously amateurish error?

    Quote Originally Posted by amk View Post
    actually I have a diff view. Lippo can be sued for "facilitating a cheat" on a bank. UOB's loan approval process is an internal issue, at most MAS reprimand UOB for "lack of due diligence". But for Lippo, acting blur on this obvious cash back scheme cannot constitute as a defence. The bank has no means of knowing the cash back, the seller has.

    clearly UOB is going after Lippo for the money... chasing a few individuals will not help the bottom line.

Similar Threads

  1. Proportion of loss-making transactions in resale market up in November
    By New Reporter in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 28-12-20, 21:35
  2. A few RCR transactions sold at a loss
    By wannabe in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 12
    -: 22-07-16, 17:21
  3. St REGIS: Sold for $15.8 mio loss
    By gsmsimmax3 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 11
    -: 18-03-15, 16:26
  4. More private properties being sold at a loss
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 05-02-15, 16:05
  5. Any RCR transaction sold at loss yet?
    By Poloclub in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 5
    -: 23-03-12, 00:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •