Page 35 of 148 FirstFirst ... 51015202530313233343536373839404550556065 ... LastLast
Results 1,021 to 1,050 of 4428

Thread: A few CCR transactions sold at a loss (reported in The Edge)

  1. #1021
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by starrynight
    It is 65 Cove Drive
    Buy and sell exactly same price, another de-coupling?

  2. #1022
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    706

    Default

    Looks like it!

    Quote Originally Posted by Pynchmail
    Buy and sell exactly same price, another de-coupling?

  3. #1023
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Probably more to come.

  4. #1024
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    GRANGE INFINITE

    BOUGHT 2007-09-25 3201PSF 2594 SQ FT
    SOLD 2013-03-27 2313PSF

    TOTAL LOSS IN EXCESS OF $2.5M FOR AN 8.3M PURCHASE IE LOST >30% BEFORE COMISSIONS.

  5. #1025
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    THE GRANGE

    BOUGHT 2008-06-09 2300PSF 1765 SQ FT
    SOLD 2013-03-27 2266PSF

  6. #1026
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    GRANGE INFINITE

    BOUGHT 2007-09-25 3201PSF 2594 SQ FT
    SOLD 2013-03-27 2313PSF

    TOTAL LOSS IN EXCESS OF $2.5M FOR AN 8.3M PURCHASE IE LOST >30% BEFORE COMISSIONS.
    just be careful about URA definition of resale, subsale, new sale.
    after developer completed, it will be considered RESALE, even though it is direct sale from developer.

    for the unit in question #23-01 Grange infinite
    2007-09-25 NEW SALE
    2013-03-27 RESALE.
    a possible scenario is 1st buyer didnt complete transaction and developer sold it as resale unit after completion of the condo.

    If you see, 2 NEW SALE for same unit, it means 1st buyer backout.

    Only 1 scenario is confirm loss, ie NEW SALE follow by SUBSALE because if 1st buyer backout, then it is considered NEW SALE by developer before project complete.

    If NEW sale follow by RESALE, 1st buyer not confirmed loss because it is considered as RESALE by developer after project complete.


    if you use squarefoot, and list all transactions, there will be some units which have no duplicates, ie units which have only RESALE status, but no NEW SALE status. this means developer sell unit after project completion.

    in cases where the loss seems alot, only INLIS will provide us the correct whether it is true loss or 1st buyer backout, not squarefoot.

  7. #1027
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    not sure if 23-01 is one of the 50+ units which the ara dragon fund bought.

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    just be careful about URA definition of resale, subsale, new sale.
    after developer completed, it will be considered RESALE, even though it is direct sale from developer.

    for the unit in question #23-01 Grange infinite
    2007-09-25 NEW SALE
    2013-03-27 RESALE.
    a possible scenario is 1st buyer didnt complete transaction and developer sold it as resale unit after completion of the condo.

    If you see, 2 NEW SALE for same unit, it means 1st buyer backout.

    Only 1 scenario is confirm loss, ie NEW SALE follow by SUBSALE because if 1st buyer backout, then it is considered NEW SALE by developer before project complete.

    If NEW sale follow by RESALE, 1st buyer not confirmed loss because it is considered as RESALE by developer after project complete.


    if you use squarefoot, and list all transactions, there will be some units which have no duplicates, ie units which have only RESALE status, but no NEW SALE status. this means developer sell unit after project completion.

    in cases where the loss seems alot, only INLIS will provide us the correct whether it is true loss or 1st buyer backout, not squarefoot.

  8. #1028
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    even if its not actual loss, also means developer has slashed 30% off its original 2007 peak price rite?

  9. #1029
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    not sure if 23-01 is one of the 50+ units which the ara dragon fund bought.
    not sure too, if ask squarefoot to show all transactions
    there are 2 resale, 20 subsale, 19 newsale, for a total of 41 caveat lodges.
    ara bought 53 units.

  10. #1030
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    Hopeful is indeed an expert!

    Kudos to Hopeful!

    Such talents deserved to be HUAT HUAT HUAT!

    DKSG

  11. #1031
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    One Tree Hill Residence

    BOUGHT 2007-05-05 2400PSF 1130 SQ FT
    SOLD 2013-04-01 2106PSF

    NET LOSS > 400K FOR 2.7M INVESTMENT

  12. #1032
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    One Tree Hill Residence

    BOUGHT 2007-05-05 2400PSF 1130 SQ FT
    SOLD 2013-04-01 2106PSF

    NET LOSS > 400K FOR 2.7M INVESTMENT
    avoid unit #06-01 for one tree hill residence.
    4 transactions in 7 years.
    0th new sale(uncaveated), 2006 so probably 1486psf (see unit 08-01), (this buyer make money).
    1st caveat is subsale, 2007-05-03 2390psf (this buyer lose money)
    2nd caveat resale 2010-05-03 1980psf (this buyer lose money)
    3rd caveat resale 2012-07-18 1897psf. (this buyer ??)

    hmm, whats wrong with this unit. 2 out 4 owner lose money.

  13. #1033
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Got good brother???

  14. #1034
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    avoid unit #06-01 for one tree hill residence.
    4 transactions in 7 years.
    0th new sale(uncaveated), 2006 so probably 1486psf (see unit 08-01), (this buyer make money).
    1st caveat is subsale, 2007-05-03 2390psf (this buyer lose money)
    2nd caveat resale 2010-05-03 1980psf (this buyer lose money)
    3rd caveat resale 2012-07-18 1897psf. (this buyer ??)

    hmm, whats wrong with this unit. 2 out 4 owner lose money.

    maybe fengshui problem? main door facing junction?

    fengshui is real, can affect the inhabitants and to some extent the owner.
    狮子王 (formerly blackjack21trader): READ MY LIPS: NO MORE CRASH FOR 60 YEARS.

  15. #1035
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sgbuyer
    maybe fengshui problem? main door facing junction?

    fengshui is real, can affect the inhabitants and to some extent the owner.
    Bernanke / Abe are the new breed of Fengshui masters ... no others are as powerful
    Ride at your own risk !!!

  16. #1036
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    avoid unit #06-01 for one tree hill residence.
    4 transactions in 7 years.
    0th new sale(uncaveated), 2006 so probably 1486psf (see unit 08-01), (this buyer make money).
    1st caveat is subsale, 2007-05-03 2390psf (this buyer lose money)
    2nd caveat resale 2010-05-03 1980psf (this buyer lose money)
    3rd caveat resale 2012-07-18 1897psf. (this buyer ??)

    hmm, whats wrong with this unit. 2 out 4 owner lose money.
    Cool info.

    How do we search for such info?

  17. #1037
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronc
    Cool info.

    How do we search for such info?
    I wanted to ask this long time ago, think will get scolded for being spoon fed

  18. #1038
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cupcakes
    I wanted to ask this long time ago, think will get scolded for being spoon fed
    http://www.inlis.gov.sg ?

    Anyone can share why unit been changing owners past years?

  19. #1039
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    145

    Default

    Do you guys often check all past transactions before buying a house?

    I should have done that. Haha... to check fengshui.

  20. #1040
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    sign up for squarefoot.com to get 12 months access to the info at $120, ie $10 a month.

    as discussed by bro hopeful, INLIS is more complete but squarefoot is a cheaper alternative and already quite detailed enough.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cupcakes
    I wanted to ask this long time ago, think will get scolded for being spoon fed

  21. #1041
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    7,827

    Default

    Developer got low ball?

    SIX freehold residences at 8 Nassim Hill have been put on the market for bulk sale with a price tag of $58 million to $59 million.


    The condominium project, which boasts 16 luxury triplex apartments with private rooftop pools and gardens, was officially up for sale in early 2010. So far, only 10 units have been sold.


    It is developed by Tennessee, a joint venture project between Shing Kwan and BBR Holdings.


    Marketing agent of the development Savills said the six unsold units are made up of three penthouses and two townhouses - sized between 3,218 and 4,338 square feet each - as well as a corner townhouse of 5,759 sq ft.
    "The developer had planned to keep the units as an investment property for recurring rental income. However, in recent weeks, they have received unsolicited interests to acquire the units," said Steven Ming, Savills' deputy managing director and head of investment sales.


    The six apartments have an average guide price of between $2,400 and $2,450 per square foot (psf), or between $58 million and $59 million for all the units.


    The average sale price of the 10 units sold was about $3,060 psf, with the highest at $3,316 psf. The last sale done in April 2012 worked out to about $2,719 psf.


    Savills estimates there are about 320 units of freehold non-landed residence currently with a Nassim address that are not wholly held by a single landlord for lease only.


    It does not expect more new schemes in the Nassim area for the "foreseeable future", save for the 65 units that may come from two future developments.


    "We do not think that any supply growth of physical residential units in the prime areas can match up to a potential uplift in demand that can be underpinned by population growth over the medium to long term," said Mr Ming.


    The development is located near Botanic Gardens and Orchard Road. It is also near the upcoming Napier and Orchard Boulevard MRT stations.
    The sale by expressions of interest will close on May 8 at 4 pm.
    "Never argue with an idiot, or he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

  22. #1042
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    another record low psf for a standard sized unit at Grange Inifinite but no matching caveat:

    2013-03-27 #13-03 2368 sq ft 2200psf $5,209,600

  23. #1043
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default capitaland has cut prices for Urban Resort

    any takers?

    ALL NEW SALES STACK 03, 2551 sq ft:

    #12-03 3131psf 2011-05-11
    #11-03 3092psf 2012-10-25
    #09-03 3077psf 2012-11-06
    #10-03 3076psf 2011-05-13
    #07-03 2995psf 2011-08-12
    #05-03 2968psf 2011-10-12
    #03-03 2883psf 2011-06-23

    JUST SOLD

    #13-03 2783psf 2013-04-01

    should be around 12% discount.

  24. #1044
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default this one is a real good deal!

    St Thomas Suites 2013 sq ft

    #21-02
    Sold 2013-03-27 1938psf
    Seller bought in 09
    Bought 2009-11-12 1894psf and sold without covering stamp duty.

  25. #1045
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default Grange Infinite

    as bro hopeful mentioned, can't tell if its ARA Dragon fund defaulted and developer re-selling or its ARA firesale:

    #23-01 2594 sq ft
    Sold 2013-03-27 2313psf
    Bought 2007-09-25 3201psf

    net loss around 2.6m

    #23-02 2702 sq ft
    Sold 2013-03-26 2360psf
    Bought 2007-09-25 3201psf

    net loss also around 2.6m

  26. #1046
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bargain hunter
    as bro hopeful mentioned, can't tell if its ARA Dragon fund defaulted and developer re-selling or its ARA firesale:

    #23-01 2594 sq ft
    Sold 2013-03-27 2313psf
    Bought 2007-09-25 3201psf

    net loss around 2.6m

    #23-02 2702 sq ft
    Sold 2013-03-26 2360psf
    Bought 2007-09-25 3201psf

    net loss also around 2.6m

    Hi Bargainhunter

    Thanks for the update every now and then. It has been helpful in assessing the market trend ....but of course those properties in in high end range... But still, it gave us some indication where market is heading.

    However, I notice those below $3m are still doing fine, probably most sellers have holding power due to low interest rates....

    It seems rental going down trend - someone I know who has a unit in Cosmo, vacant for 6 months, now lower rental by 15% recently, still no takers... Can anyone confirm how is the rental doing?

  27. #1047
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,279

    Default

    i think < 3m is fine becoz the absolute $ of cash to be forked out for the lower ltv, stamp duty etc is still alright. but once it crosses 3m, that's where psychological barriers start to come in. not cannot afford but unwilling to part with cash and lower leverage + lower rental yield.





    Quote Originally Posted by Werther
    Hi Bargainhunter

    Thanks for the update every now and then. It has been helpful in assessing the market trend ....but of course those properties in in high end range... But still, it gave us some indication where market is heading.

    However, I notice those below $3m are still doing fine, probably most sellers have holding power due to low interest rates....

    It seems rental going down trend - someone I know who has a unit in Cosmo, vacant for 6 months, now lower rental by 15% recently, still no takers... Can anyone confirm how is the rental doing?

  28. #1048
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    706

    Default

    Yes, would be interesting to understand how the rental mkt is doing.

    I have a feeling it's a bit weak in the CCR for decent sized units. I managed to get a 13% increase in rental for my unit (1033 sq ft) just renewed. That said, I also know of a unit in another development which could fetch around $7400 half a year ago, but the landlord is now settling for $6900.

    Quote Originally Posted by Werther
    Hi Bargainhunter

    Thanks for the update every now and then. It has been helpful in assessing the market trend ....but of course those properties in in high end range... But still, it gave us some indication where market is heading.

    However, I notice those below $3m are still doing fine, probably most sellers have holding power due to low interest rates....

    It seems rental going down trend - someone I know who has a unit in Cosmo, vacant for 6 months, now lower rental by 15% recently, still no takers... Can anyone confirm how is the rental doing?

  29. #1049
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,438

    Default

    CCR is weak now but RCR is good. My RCR 1+1 678 sq ft just renewed at 4.4k from 4k. MRT 3 mins away only, above 30th floor.



    Quote Originally Posted by starrynight
    Yes, would be interesting to understand how the rental mkt is doing.

    I have a feeling it's a bit weak in the CCR for decent sized units. I managed to get a 13% increase in rental for my unit (1033 sq ft) just renewed. That said, I also know of a unit in another development which could fetch around $7400 half a year ago, but the landlord is now settling for $6900.

  30. #1050
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8,926

    Default

    all the CEOs COOs CFOs in china and Hong Kong instead?
    two tier down in Sg budget only 4k+?
    Ride at your own risk !!!

Similar Threads

  1. Proportion of loss-making transactions in resale market up in November
    By New Reporter in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 28-12-20, 21:35
  2. A few RCR transactions sold at a loss
    By wannabe in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 12
    -: 22-07-16, 17:21
  3. St REGIS: Sold for $15.8 mio loss
    By gsmsimmax3 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 11
    -: 18-03-15, 16:26
  4. More private properties being sold at a loss
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 05-02-15, 16:05
  5. Any RCR transaction sold at loss yet?
    By Poloclub in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 5
    -: 23-03-12, 00:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •