A long long time ago, the only private housing units were, well, detached housing...
Then came semi-Ds and terrace landed. Detached housing became something much more sought after but rarer, and the vast majority had to contend to the semi-Ds and terrace landed.
Then came strata housing. The old strata housing units were spacious and huge beyond my comfort to clean. Most also came with Freehold status. Semi-Ds and terrace supply dipped tremendously and people had to accept the strata housing units as the only type of private housing available...
Then came the 99-Yr leaseholds strata housing. Now anything with FH status became rare and valued as 99Yr LHs became the only type of new housing type most people can access.
Now comes PPVC in the name of reducing construction costs in the long run. In the future, I believe the dominant type will also be this type. We have seen two bids last year in Clementi area all based on this. In the short run, the costs of PPVC are actually higher, and in the long run, the full effect of the climatic conditions on this type of development I believe has not been fully studied (my own bias), so the first years of batches will have to bear with the effects say two decades down the road, if there are any (possibly none though).
So if it were you, how would you make your choice?
That's why my first response: you would wait till rents stabilise, confirmed and chopped the Govt bringing in enough foreign talents, prices start to move up, then you buy with confidence.
No right or wrong way - its the way our thinking works.
![Quote](images/SultanThemeVB4R/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Spincity1
Thanks for sharing you views
So long as Singapore stays relevant in the global context (as is today or even more relevant), the property market will fare well.
Just that since 2006 the supply was pretty much planned based on a sustained (big) increase of inflow of foreigners to Singapore, which may not happen any time soon for both domestic political reasons and the shifts in global economy, the surplus in supply may take longer to be taken up before seeing a market-wide appreciation in property price, not from the price today but the price then. I won't call 5-year a generous buffer but just my opinion though
Isn't PPVC only compulsory on selected GLS sites? I believe that there are design constraints for PPVC hence am not sure if it can be imposed industry-wide, and commercially it may not be necessary nor make sense, neither.
The three laws of Kelonguni:
Where there is kelong, there is guni.
No kelong no guni.
More kelong = more guni.