Page 43 of 115 FirstFirst ... 131823283338394041424344454647485358636873 ... LastLast
Results 1,261 to 1,290 of 3440

Thread: Watertown : Punggol Waterfront Living

  1. #1261
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dtrax
    ... I used to remember the FH condo beside Dhoby Ghaut properties are selling around the same price at Watertown, 1.3-1.5k psf. ...
    as a matter of fact, today you still have LH condo in Orchard Boulevard at $1390 psf. the catch is, not at a token sum of just a few hundred k.

    so the game did not *really* change that much. the only thing that changes a lot is, developers like FEO discovers new way to profit in this business. Small quantum enables almost any HDB family to be in property investment, especially for projects that do have merits. WT does have nice plus points (as compared with KPLD's Sengkang project).

    So with almost 70% of WT dedicated to small 1/2 bedrooms, it's no secret most buyers are HDB investors. For investors, I can only say this is an untested market. Would a FT rent a 1bd at Punggol among all the bigger HDBs around ? Maybe. It's of course a risk.

  2. #1262
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    34

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by chanel
    you made the right choice, best of both worlds in fact! Facing the main pool plus got a partial view of the waterfront. Front facing may end up very noisy with many restaurants below including large crowds during week-ends. Fortunately you went for 81 otherwise you end up paying 25% more for front stacks which is commanding around $1,400psf now.
    Not really! I can't afford it at $1400psf!

  3. #1263
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chanel
    Very true indeed!
    Our little red dot has limited land, property prices has only one direction to move upwards and with this trend, freehold land doesnt really hold true anymore. Nowadays, people doesnt bother with freehold, afterall we dont live that long and do they care about the next generation to pass on their properties. If they can afford, they rather spend their money and live in style at whichever district of their choice.
    For comparison, Kovan Residences 99 years lease (just TOP) versus freehold Bliss Kovan (just launched & a stone throw away), both transacting about the same price of $1,400psf. Bliss was launched few months ago and so far, less than 50% sold as reported by developer (BBR) in the Business Times last week.
    the freehold vs 99 will be tested when some properties hit close to 99years and we can actually see what happens next. as will the state take back the land and chases those living there out. then maybe there can be a clearer distinction between freehold vs 99.

  4. #1264
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howgozit
    Test water prices exceeded expectations so FEO strike iron while hot, ramped up the prices ridiculously to capitalise on the feeding frenzy and herd mentality.
    CDL Qwek's words of wisdom:

    1) "It's never about affordability. It's the sentiment"
    2) "The higher the property prices, the more people will buy".

  5. #1265
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    i might not see that in my lifetime. lol.

  6. #1266
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    34

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Xan
    FEO pricing is weird.
    25% price differenece is a very huge difference.
    I dont think the view can cause such a big difference in price.
    Anyway, he definitely got a very good deal.
    Actually it's a 40% difference to be exact! Incredible!

  7. #1267
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk
    CDL Qwek's words of wisdom:

    1) "It's never about affordability. It's the sentiment"
    2) "The higher the property prices, the more people will buy".
    it's the same as stocks.

  8. #1268
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    the freehold vs 99 will be tested when some properties hit close to 99years and we can actually see what happens next. as will the state take back the land and chases those living there out. then maybe there can be a clearer distinction between freehold vs 99.

    I thought it has already been tested? Many 99 LH (except landed) properties successfully concluded their collective sales in recent years? It is a win-win formula.

    Majority of the properties are 99 LH. ALL HDBs are 99LH. What will happen if such a scenario occurred, i.e., chase residents out and take back the land? The whole property market will collapse. Do you think the gahmen want that?

    Don't be surprised that even before we reach that stage, the gahmen may start introducing 60 years LH land to turn around the properties faster.

  9. #1269
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,063

    Default

    Actually if people are willing to pay such high price and later no one is willing to let go at a low price, then the price will be high.

    Example is a priceless painting.
    For me I don't know how to appreciate paintings, therefore i will never understand why some can pay millions for it, other than for investment purposes.

  10. #1270
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    the freehold vs 99 will be tested when some properties hit close to 99years and we can actually see what happens next. as will the state take back the land and chases those living there out. then maybe there can be a clearer distinction between freehold vs 99.
    I think may not have to wait that long. The banks will get cautious even before the 99LH is up. The test is in the financing the banks are willing to offer when CPF restrictions kick in when the property reaches 40yeras old.

    What happens then will have an effect on other 99LH properties. In the last few years with all the enbloc frenzy, a lot of LH properties have been given a new lease of life thru enbloc so the CPF restrictions no opportunity to have an impact.

  11. #1271
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fclim
    I thought it has already been tested? Many 99 LH (except landed) properties successfully concluded their collective sales in recent years? It is a win-win formula.

    Majority of the properties are 99 LH. ALL HDBs are 99LH. What will happen if such a scenario occurred, i.e., chase residents out and take back the land? The whole property market will collapse. Do you think the gahmen want that?

    Don't be surprised that even before we reach that stage, the gahmen may start introducing 60 years LH land to turn around the properties faster.
    only for HDB hor...and for HDB, you are a lessee and not a strata owner. this is different for private 99LH. like The acardia. their lease will not be renewed. the point is no one knows exactly what the govt will do. everyone can say what they want. which is why i say the difference will be clear when a private property actually hits the 99year mark.

    anyway your statement is conflicting. on one hand you say the govt will not chase people out when the 99year is reach but now they want to introduce 60LH. to make a shorter LH work you will need to chase people out or make then pay the lease again right? and if some of the strata owners dun pay? then you need to set up a department to kick those who dont pay out and keep those who pay?
    Last edited by mkl22; 08-02-12 at 14:35.

  12. #1272
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    there are some HDBs in bukit merah and toa payoh approaching 40 years if i remember correctly. en bloc not yet happen.

  13. #1273
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,013

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kane
    there are some HDBs in bukit merah and toa payoh approaching 40 years if i remember correctly. en bloc not yet happen.
    Public housing is govt's initiative. These old HDB flats will get their SERS in due time. Just don't know when. Mr Khaw has plenty on his platter now so worry about SERS.

  14. #1274
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,482

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ysyap
    Public housing is govt's initiative. These old HDB flats will get their SERS in due time. Just don't know when. Mr Khaw has plenty on his platter now so worry about SERS.
    actually i would have thought doing those in parallel would help because essentially, they would be increasing the supply and maximising the plot ratios on the existing old plots.

  15. #1275
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,997

    Default

    Q: How much of my CPF savings can I withdraw to buy a private property with remaining lease of less than 60 years but at least 30 years?

    A:You can use your Ordinary Account savings, and the future monthly CPF contributions in this account to buy the property and/ or to pay the monthly installments of the housing loan up to the applicable Withdrawal Limit (WL). The applicable WL is set at a level that covers the estimated depreciated value of the property when the member reaches the CPF withdrawal age of 55 years. It is calculated based on the ratio of the remaining lease when the member is 55 years old, to the lease at the point of purchase.
    Example:

    A 35 year old member buys a private property with 50 years of lease remaining. When the member turns 55 years old, the property will have 30 years of lease remaining.
    Hence, the applicable WL = 30/50 x 100% = 60% of *Valuation Limit
    * Valuation Limit is the lower of the purchase price or the value of the property at the time of purchase.
    In the case of properties with remaining leases less than 60 years but at least 30 years, the applicable Withdrawal Limit is the ratio of the remaining lease of the property when the member is 55 years old, to the lease at the point of purchase. Please refer to the following table for more details.

  16. #1276
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    i think the 1st plots of 99years LH reaching expiry will be those landed at rifle range and maybe near tanah merah station? in another 20years or so?

    But these are landed and affects only a few. wait till it comes to those condos with 200-300 units or more. then we can know what exactly happens

  17. #1277
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    only for HDB hor...and for HDB, you are a lessee and not a strata owner. this is different for private 99LH. like The acardia. their lease will not be renewed. the point is no one knows exactly what the govt will do. everyone can say what they want. which is why i say the difference will be clear when a private property actually hits the 99year mark.

    anyway your statement is conflicting. on one hand you say the govt will not chase people out when the 99year is reach but now they want to introduce 60LH. to make a shorter LH work you will need to chase people out or make then pay the lease again right? and if some of the strata owners dun pay? then you need to set up a department to kick those who dont pay out and keep those who pay?
    No conflicting statement. 60 yrs LH to turn around the land faster. Every area needs rejuvenation to avoid becoming a slum. Needs mindset change from banks, CPF board.

    Anyway, gahmen dun kick people out, but go for collective sales and top
    up lease.

  18. #1278
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fclim
    No conflicting statement. 60 yrs LH to turn around the land faster. Every area needs rejuvenation to avoid becoming a slum. Needs mindset change from banks, CPF board.

    Anyway, gahmen dun kick people out, but go for collective sales and top
    up lease.
    for collective sales still need 80% right. what if no 80%? then somehow force people to sign to get 80% to become a collective sale? and for lease top up the old building still stands then, so how does it tie in with your renewal process. am still talking about private leasehold, not HDB which is totally different.

    not sure if i am understanding you completely. others can correct me? or help me understand what fclim is saying.

  19. #1279
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    787

    Default


    useful explanation. we all take solace in companionship.

  20. #1280
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mkl22
    for collective sales still need 80% right. what if no 80%? then somehow force people to sign to get 80% to become a collective sale? and for lease top up the old building still stands then, so how does it tie in with your renewal process. am still talking about private leasehold, not HDB which is totally different.

    not sure if i am understanding you completely. others can correct me? or help me understand what fclim is saying.
    Yes, en-bloc sale needs at least 80% approval from owners.
    Some people like to buy old apartments, trying to cash in for enbloc sales, very lucrative cos can profit almost double.
    For old HDB blocks which are redeveloped, they offer owners brand new units at nearby location but need to top-up.

  21. #1281
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fclim
    I find it hard to believe the buyers of WT feel that their purchases are good deals when they are paying the highest psf amongst all the properties in Punggol currently.

    Sorry, this is just a frank observation. No intention to pour cold water. WT is really a nice development for own stay.
    Highest PSF is logical given its the most valued plot of land in Punggol.

  22. #1282
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pineapple
    Highest PSF is logical given its the most valued plot of land in Punggol.
    Perceived value FEO is tell all the C.....

  23. #1283
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amk
    CDL Qwek's words of wisdom:

    1) "It's never about affordability. It's the sentiment"
    2) "The higher the property prices, the more people will buy".

    Yes and u realized a lot are sgpean . Usually that single the end of the cycle. Leaving many sgpean holding to assest. The smarts foreginer investor all off load , developer off load.

    Pity all the C... I mean buyers

  24. #1284
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ay123
    last time only those near city can command high price but now the buying sentiment has changed. now PPL look for convenient then to be near city. the new generation want new lively town. as long it is near MRT or mall (best is near both) the new generation is willing to pay for it. anyway spore is so small, even if you travel from east to west or north to south, the most you spend one to one n half hour of journey. the new generation is looking for far from noisy town but equip with necessary amenities and near MRT. as long a project that fulfil such requirement, it will attract buyer.
    This is herd instinct. Like horse 1 run all run.. Why run? Dono just follow..

  25. #1285
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by howgozit
    Another way to look at it is that the people who bought later got a very bad deal.

    Test water prices exceeded expectations so FEO strike iron while hot, ramped up the prices ridiculously to capitalise on the feeding frenzy and herd mentality.

    FEO really milked it and lapped it up.

    I m sure the FEO agents scream HUAT aH!!!!

  26. #1286
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minority
    Yes and u realized a lot are sgpean . Usually that single the end of the cycle. Leaving many sgpean holding to assest. The smarts foreginer investor all off load , developer off load.

    Pity all the C... I mean buyers
    Why pity the rich when they hv spare cash to be used for property investment?
    Actually, we pity you more

  27. #1287
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minority
    This is herd instinct. Like horse 1 run all run.. Why run? Dono just follow..
    Because this project "no horse run"

  28. #1288
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xan
    Why pity the rich when they hv spare cash to be used for property investment?
    Actually, we pity you more
    No need to pity me I already bought many an offloaded to fellow sgpean .

  29. #1289
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xan
    Because this project "no horse run"
    Hah hah ok no horse run following a no eye deer.

  30. #1290
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minority
    No need to pity me I already bought many an offloaded to fellow sgpean .
    Why u like dreaming and talking to yourself?
    Yawn zzz. No one interested in your stories lah.
    Coincidentally, your "success stories" sounded like mr B

Similar Threads

  1. Watertown in Punggol almost 97% sold
    By reporter2 in forum Singapore Private Condominium Property Discussion and News
    Replies: 0
    -: 08-10-12, 16:07
  2. Waterfront living and humidity
    By mcmlxxvi in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 25
    -: 31-12-11, 18:58
  3. Waterfront living? This is it
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 22-03-10, 02:10
  4. Bustling waterfront living for Punggol
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 1
    -: 13-12-08, 20:17
  5. Coming up: Waterfront living for HDB residents
    By mr funny in forum HDB, EC, commercial and industrial property discussion
    Replies: 0
    -: 05-02-07, 14:35

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •