bro, do you think this will materialize if the owners dont kick a fuss? it takes many years and just one revolution to change a dynastyOriginally Posted by carbuncle
bro, do you think this will materialize if the owners dont kick a fuss? it takes many years and just one revolution to change a dynastyOriginally Posted by carbuncle
Bite me first and shuddup before you have any more ideas of grandiose...!!!!Originally Posted by graveyard
that was my ideaOriginally Posted by azeoprop
Woooh, such a fierce uncle!Originally Posted by carbuncle
Fierce and sexy... Sex crazed rather WakakalaOriginally Posted by peterlee
I will buy a pitbull and rottweiler and bite youOriginally Posted by carbuncle
He is the one who assure top 2012 to me as wellOriginally Posted by dolphin1902
![]()
Thank you. Just back from bs trip. Will lodge a complaint to CEA on mon. However, there is nth much we can do n i dont think dev will compensate us for mthly rental that we paid. Isnt it?Originally Posted by Jcmillineum
I do think you have any case to lodge a report against them unlesss there is a written note and signed by them during closing of deal.Originally Posted by llzz
You can try suing Jefrrey to recover damages. But guess hard to prove any wrong doing as the S&P is quite clear on TOP. Anyone needs a good law firm? I can refer. Small size law firm at Clifford Centre but very good legal people there.Originally Posted by DC33_2008
Why are you concerned about our sex crazed uncle when you should be concerned for the completion of your condo!Originally Posted by graveyard
![]()
sun bian. after biting sex crazed uncle, one will take down fragrance and the other my agentOriginally Posted by ysyap
Just pull the trigger first la, think abt dat later. we will end up grumbling here forever pointlessly while the agent, FG go scot free if we dont escalate juz becoz we think it wont make a differenceOriginally Posted by llzz
the developer might not pay rental rebates to the owner. Instead will pour in all resources and quicken the completion to quickly close the case.
nagative publicity is bad for the company, no matter who is right / wrong and jeopadizing the image of the company is the least they want to do.
suggest to all existing unhappy owners to advertise their unhappiness in straits time quarter page. perhaps wont cost much but give the case full publicity.
But Im not sure straits times will accept the request & risk future advertising revenues from Fragrance Group. LOL
yes and i think i speak for most of the owners that we are just demanding what we are verbally promised .. TOP 2102. Fix that - the furniture vouchers, cash compensation etc are superficialOriginally Posted by rattydrama
Hmm there is already an article written on this on ST ..abt 1/4 page .. perhaps TODAY should carry it too to max publicity![]()
i believe CEA is working on this. let's see how things progress![]()
Are you sure you are fighting for that promised TOP date???Originally Posted by graveyard
![]()
![]()
Should not be a problem if they do it intensively and fast....Originally Posted by ysyap
I give up on these folks already... Kena set dogs on to chew me up liao... WakakakaOriginally Posted by ysyap
fragrance got deep pockets rite?Originally Posted by ysyap
Lol.... think nobody got my meaning... check out the TOP date he wrote... 2102...Originally Posted by ysyap
![]()
typo la mate ..2012!!!Originally Posted by ysyap
![]()
now FAT with the hotels GPH IPO. maybe run into cashflow pro coz expand too fastOriginally Posted by rattydrama
I know..., have a glass of cool water to refresh yourself...Originally Posted by graveyard
![]()
Thankss. yes need to cool myselfOriginally Posted by ysyap
.. quite heated up recently over this
Was talking to a random housing agent today and mentioned about Suites@PL. Agent was quick to point out that there is a group of angry buyers about to turn the tables against the developer... Lol! Its all happening in this forum!![]()
There is a proper clause in the standard S&P to deal with such delay.
I think a LD of 12%pa, based on certain sum. can't recall correctly
Originally Posted by Laguna
dat is against TOP on paper that is Dec 2014 rite? i think the owners will explode if ever we need to consider claiming for this
haa. dont underestimate power of online mediaOriginally Posted by ysyap
Yup... that agent said she read it in the papers...Originally Posted by graveyard
![]()
Bottomline is the legal S&P with owners' signature. Developer can say Agent or article in newspaper misrepresents them.Originally Posted by ysyap