Page 6 of 76 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111621263136 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 2277

Thread: Please post any Election News/Snippets/ Gossips here

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singa...35611-590.html

    ‘Orchid Evolution’ sweeping through S’pore: veteran editor



    Veteran editor P N Balji said a new mood is gripping Singapore. (Photo courtesy of Reputation Management Assoc …




    The "Jasmine Revolution" or turmoil that has toppled governments in the Middle East is not likely to take place in Singapore, but a major transformation is sweeping through society in the country, said a veteran local journalist and editor.

    Speaking before an audience of about 80 executives at a seminar on corporate reputations on Friday morning, PN Balji, former CEO and editor-in-chief of TODAY newspaper, said this transformation, or what he termed as Singapore's "Orchid Evolution", is reflected by the new mood of the nation and other changes.


    "I notice a certain restlessness, even restiveness, among different sections of the people," said the former editor with over 40 years of experience in journalism.


    "Because the government has played a critical role, a womb-to-tomb role in people's lives, now there's a boomerang effect. They blame the government for everything that goes wrong in Singapore."


    He said there have been "quite a lot" of blunders in the past few years such as the flooding of Orchard Road, the security lapse at the MRT station and the prison escape of Singapore Jemaah Islamiyah leader Mas Selamat Kastari.


    Coverage of politics

    Balji, who is currently director of the Asia Journalism Fellowship at the Nanyang Technological University, noted that the public's new attitude towards the government goes in tandem with the change in how the traditional media cover the opposition parties.


    "It is like a breath of fresh air, the way the media is now reporting on opposition politicians and opposition politics," he said.

    "There are two elements to this. One, the kind of prominence that opposition politicians and politics gets, and, second, the reports try very hard not to put them in a negative light, which as recent as 2006 was not true."

    He believed that that this approach by the traditional media would not have gone ahead without some tacit acceptance by the government.

    "Why do I think the government has tacitly agreed to this? I think the government doesn't want readership, circulation, viewership to drop," he said.

    "If it drops the biggest loser is the government. They don't have any other platform which can reach that wide an audience."


    He acknowledged that social media is available, but that it may not work for the PAP. He cited how Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong's attempt to make a joke on Facebook about PAP's new candidate, Tin Pei Ling, fell flat.


    "The new media is putting a lot of pressure on the mainstream media. If for some reason the mainstream media is not seen to reflect a kind of public opinion, they are going to be punished, and punished very, very heavily," he said.


    Other issues


    Meanwhile, he noted that immigration has become one of the biggest issues in Singapore, despite the government making "concession after concession".


    "I don't think a right-thinking Singaporean is against foreigners per se. I think they understand foreigners are needed," he said.


    The question among people's minds is how come this government, if it is so good, cannot manage the problems of infrastructure -- whether the congestion of roads and MRT trains or the rocketting prices of housing -- that came as a result of it opening the immigration floodgates in 2005, he added.


    Another change that he has observed has come over Singapore is the wild swings in economic growth. "One year you will go into recession, next year you will have 15 percent growth, the next year maybe 5 percent. How the people will adjust to that wild swing is another issue."


    Furthermore, he believes the attitude towards older people has changed. He noted that the PAP has been stressing the point of having young people.


    "The government keeps on harping on young people, but what is there to say you can't have a 65-year-old man or woman serving Parliament for five years?" he asked.


    Yearning for change


    Overall, however, based on his conversations with different types of people, Balji said that he gets a genuine feeling from people that they are not against the PAP government, but that they have a strong desire for more voices in Parliament.


    "Look at the opposition, the young, talented, impressive people who are joining the opposition. That must indicate that there is less fear, and there is really a genuine desire to see some kind of change -- not the change of revolution, but a change in wanting more voices," he said.


    He said he could not tell how this new groundswell of opinion would translate in the upcoming polls.


    "Maybe this is just people letting out steam, and when it comes to the final analysis, they know which side their bread is buttered," he said.


    Nevertheless, his gut feeling based on anecdotal evidence is: "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats. Two, that they might even take back Potong Pasir.

    Three, there will be a number of close fights, very close some of them. Fourth point, PAP's percentage of votes may go down even further. In good times, they manage 60 percent of the votes."

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/hawker-couple-attacks-pore-family-20110415-042104-221.html

    Hawker couple attacks S’pore family


    A Singaporean family was assaulted yesterday by a hawker couple known for their bad temper. (Yahoo!)


    A portion of anchovies, better known to locals as "ikan bilis", sparked off a brawl between a Singaporean family and a hawker couple at Food Loft along Clementi Ave 3 on Thursday.


    According to local news website, AsiaOne, the dispute started after Julia, a STOMP contributor, took an extra portion of anchovies from a container placed outside the hawker stall after paying for her noodles.


    The female stall holder, who according to Julia was from China, then raised her voice and said, "You Singaporeans who are paying so little money want to have so much of everything." She continued to complain to passers-by and her husband.


    Julia's husband then approached the female hawker to ask why she was making a big fuss out of an extra portion of anchovies. Agitated, the female stall holder slammed the plastic container of anchovies that he was holding onto the table.


    Julia's husband later revealed that they had also tried to take photos of the food from the stall. They had planned to make a report to National Environment Agency as the food did not seem clean.


    This incurred the wrath of the male hawker, who stepped out of the stall and demanded to know why he was taking pictures.

    The hawker couple then started to attack Julia and her husband. Their 14 year-old son was punched in the process. The male hawker also hit Julia's husband's head with an object.


    Julia's husband could not retaliate as Julia and the coffee shop owner had stopped him from doing so.


    Even after the family ran away in defence, the hawker woman stood in front of Julia's car to prevent the family from driving off, allowing her husband to continue attacking the car from behind.


    Julia sustained injuries on her back and head after falling while trying to stop her husband from retaliating during the attack.

    Both her husband's eyes were swollen and her son also suffered a bruised eye. The family's medical bills amounted to S$180. They also made a police report later that night.


    The coffee shop owner later revealed that the hawker couple they encountered was known for their bad temper.

    A police report has been lodged against the hawkers. The police have classified it as mischief and voluntarily causing hurt and are currently looking into the matter.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singa...11723-098.html

    ‘Do we want powerless MPs in Parliament?’


    Just how effective is the NCMP scheme in Parliament? (Yahoo! photo)



    OPINION


    By Andrew Loh

    It was a masterstroke by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) when it amended the Constitution in April last year to increase the number of non-constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs) from three to nine.

    The PAP said the move was to address the public's desire to have more opposition views expressed in Parliament. Critics, however, saw it as a way to curb the public's desire for more elected opposition MPs.

    As the next general election approaches, PAP ministers have been selling the NCMP scheme as the bona fide scheme which assures an opposition voice; that such alternative views in Parliament are guaranteed — even if the PAP makes a clean sweep at the polls.


    The underlying message is thus: do not vote for the opposition because there will be at least nine opposition NCMPs in Parliament anyway, and Singapore needs a "strong government" to see it through the challenges ahead.

    If more opposition members are elected as Members of Parliament (MPs), fractious debates in the House will take place and Singapore will suffer because of this.


    There are, of course, many flaws to the PAP's arguments. These include the fact that NCMPs' voting powers are limited, that NCMPs do not represent any of the constituencies or constituents and that they do not have access to residents on the ground like an MP does.


    At the Channel News Asia television forum on 12 April, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong again defended the scheme.


    He pointed out that NCMPs had full debating rights in Parliament, and the scheme gave opposition politicians the chance to establish themselves and strengthen their positions in subsequent general elections, The Straits Times stated.


    He explained that the PAP instituted and then expanded the scheme because it acknowledged both the desire among Singaporeans for alternative voices and the need for an opposition to represent the diverse views in society, the paper reported.


    There seems to be a glaring misunderstanding by the PAP about what exactly it is that Singaporeans desire.

    I would suggest that it is not just having opposition voices to speak up on issues which Singaporeans are looking for, but that these alternative voices have the backing of law — i.e. full voting rights — to stop the government from pushing through legislation.


    NCMPs do not have such powers when it comes to Constitutional amendments.


    Despite taking part in the debate last year to increase the number of both NCMPs and Nominated MPs (NMPs), the only NCMP in the House, the Workers' Party Sylvia Lim, had no voting rights to vote against the bill.

    After making a well thought-out and passionate speech, Lim ended with: "The Member for Hougang will be voting against the amendment, as I cannot vote."


    And therein lies the crux of the matter, really. Why should the government, and indeed Singaporeans, take NCMPs seriously when they are unable to affect changes to the law, do not represent anyone and do not even have access to constituents like MPs do?


    If speaking up is all that is desired, as the PAP seems to think, then we should in fact do away with the NMP and NCMP schemes because in the age of the Internet and the miracle of its tools, the government "can just set up a huge mailbox for people to send their grouses" to, as the WP's Chen Show Mao said.


    Every citizen will be an NCMP. "Isn't that even better? But can this encourage the ruling party to do better?" he asked.


    So, while the PAP's argument that alternative voices will already be represented in Parliament and there is thus no need to vote in opposition members is seductive, the real question here is this: does it serve Singapore to have only neutered MPs to provide that voice?


    If the PAP had its way, its MPs — even those less able than opposition ones — will get to be full MPs with full voting rights, while opposition MPs, even those who are more able than PAP ones, will remain neutered NCMPs.


    In short, the PAP wants opposition MPs to play only a supporting role. Or to put it another way, opposition MPs should only have sharp tongues but no teeth.


    Would it benefit Singaporeans more to have legitimate, elected, non-ruling party members — MPs who not only have the power to speak, but who are also able to express this in the most substantial manner possible by having a vote in the House?


    Do we want powerless MPs in the highest law-making body in the land?
    I think the answer is obvious.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singa...02708-308.html

    Rooting for the 'invisible poor': WP's Angela Oon


    As part of Yahoo! Singapore's coverage of the 2011 General Elections, we speak to new faces to look out for in the coming weeks. In the final installment of a four-part series, ALICIA WONG speaks Angela Oon of the Workers' Party.




    Workers' Party newcomer Angela Oon, 32, wants more help for the underclass. (Angela …




    There is a "growing underclass" in Singapore that has been overlooked in policy-making because they are not vocal and seldom in the public eye, believes Workers' Party (WP) newcomer Angela Oon.


    During their walkabouts, she meets those struggling to make ends meet but yet cannot get public assistance because they fall just outside the eligibility criteria.


    "That's why the WP advocate a needs-based social safety net," said the 32-year-old researcher, who joined the Workers' Party last July.

    Currently an independent researcher, the university graduate is expected to contest in the new five-member Nee Soon group representation constituency.


    In an email interview with Yahoo! Singapore, Oon said besides the "invisible poor", the widening income gap -- which "can erode social stability in the long term"-- and lack of government transparency are other issues close to her heart.


    Lamenting the lack of openness in the workings of key government ministries, and in the disclosure of statistics, she questioned how the government could then be held accountable.


    For example, employment figures for permanent residents and Singaporeans are not released separately so it is hard to tell if certain initiatives to increase jobs or salaries benefit Singaporeans or PRs.


    "It's impossible for the WP to advocate a more detailed recommendation in our manifesto without such information," she added, responding to Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng's call for the WP to elaborate on plans to in its manifesto.


    Acknowledging that Singaporeans prefer gradual reform, particularly when it comes to introducing more "alternative voices" into Parliament, Oon pointed out there may be no better time than now.


    "Right now, we have the luxury of implementing such changes in incremental steps because our country is in a period of growth and stability," she said.

    'Politics is intensely personal'


    Oon described her decision to join politics and, specifically the WP, as "a natural progression of my inherent interest in politics and civil society".
    Singaporeans often think of politics as "distant" from everyday life, but politics is "intensely personal", she stressed. Public policies impact "almost every aspect of our daily lives".


    She started her involvement with the WP a few years ago when some friends, who were party members, invited her to help in activities, such as temple tours.


    "It was when I saw how much they (WP members) happily sacrificed to be part of a larger cause that my admiration for them blossomed," she said, referring to the time and effort spent on house visits and to sell the party newsletter, The Hammer.


    "I decided to stand next to them, to be part of this like-minded team of people working toward the goal of making sure Singapore has a First World parliament as befits its First World status," she stated.


    It was a decision that could not have come easily, given that Oon was previously working under a statutory board.


    In an earlier interview, she said, "I was prepared for the worst but hoping for the best."


    Her family, however, were not surprised at her decision.


    "They were a little apprehensive (at first)... Now they are wholeheartedly behind me," said Oon, who has been married for four years and has no children.


    While she only became a citizen in 2010, the Kelantan-born Oon has been in Singapore since she was two months old. She became a PR when she was five.


    "I've gone through all the joys and trials and experiences of growing up as a Singaporean," she said.


    "I have chosen to make Singapore my home, to sink and swim with its fortunes, and to continue building a life here with my loved ones.

    That's why I'm stepping forward to do my part to strengthen Singapore's parliamentary system."

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    Workers Party Secret Weapon will lose to this Lady 陈佩玲 Tin Pei Ling



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmbQE...eature=related




    He has been called the Workers' Party's 'secret weapon', but corporate lawyer Chen Show Mao said the true weapon would be the votes of Singaporeans during Polling Day.

    50-year-old took up citizenship in 1986 and has degrees from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford universities.


    The lady is Tin Pei Ling, 27 years old PAP star candidate who does not know what to say...., but she will be smuggled into Parliament, while the other guy would be out, unless a miracle takes place......



    见不得光的选举 — 集选区内每一个单独选区的成绩?

    虽然说"人不可以貌相",然而不认识陈佩玲的人,看到陈佩玲那一只娃娃脸而不心生狐疑,那简直说不过去。不是吗?政治又不是玩家家酒,把治国大任委托在一个黄毛丫头的身上­,这政治不太也轻率了些?


    恰恰就是那些网络影像,生动地描绘出了一个轻浮的时髦少年的背景,让人触目惊心。如果说,我们必须有能够代表青少年的政治人物,那么是不是说我们也必须遴选一个乳臭未干的­儿童作为我们的议员?


    陈佩玲事件,其实不在于陈佩玲竞选不竞选,而在于集选区这个制度的无耻 — 完全没有道德的支撑。试想,大家都晓得,其实就算是一只畜牲,如果也能够算是集选区的一员。那么,不管是来自执政党反对党,那一团的集选胜利了,畜牲也可以代表人民说话。


    这才是舆论所在,引起人们议论纷纷的原因。所有针对陈佩玲的矛头,指的都不是陈小姐,而是无耻、没有道德的集选区制度。

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmbQE...eature=related

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    Chen show mao is a more valuable asset in parliament compared to tin pei ling

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    221

    Default

    tin pei ling say she has emerged much more mature wor.. from news report

    i wana laff.. in a matter of weeks.. how much more mature can she be?

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    In another week she will call herself a lao jiao in politics
    Quote Originally Posted by romeo
    tin pei ling say she has emerged much more mature wor.. from news report

    i wana laff.. in a matter of weeks.. how much more mature can she be?

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    http://www.transitioning.org/2010/05...-2004-onwards/


    Tragic Account of MRT Suicides From 2004 Onwards

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singa...21256-248.html


    Man arrested for attempted suicide at MRT station


    A man in his mid-30s has been arrested for attempted suicide at Sembawang MRT Station on Friday night.

    The police and Singapore Civil Defence Force said they received a call at about 11.35 pm on Friday, informing them a man had fallen onto the train tracks at Sembawang MRT station.

    "Upon police arrival, a man in his mid-30s was conveyed to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital and subsequently arrested for attempted suicide," said a police spokesperson.

    The man, who had been hit by the train, complained of back pain.
    About 1,500 passengers were affected during the incident, said an SMRT spokesperson.

    "To maintain service on the unaffected stretches of the North-South line during the incident, all southbound trains were turned around at Woodlands MRT Station and some northbound trains were turned around at Yishun MRT Station," she said.

    Bus bridging services were also deployed to ferry passengers from Woodlands to Yishun MRT station.

    Commuters again took to micro-blogging site Twitter to send out alerts on the incident late on Friday.

    Johny Loy (@johnyloy) tweeted, "Accident @sembawang mrt, SMRT faster complete your barrier doors please!!!"

    Dynna Syafiqa (@dynna06) tweeted, "Chaos over at Sembawang MRT station."

    Terence Lee, editor for online website New Nation, said he went to the MRT station at about 12.20am after seeing tweets on the incident. Lee said he saw a police vehicle and policemen at the station and that a section had been cordoned off on the train platform.

    Passengers who were unable to complete their journey due to the disruption can claim a full fare refund from the Passenger Service Centre in any SMRT station within the next three working days.

    SMRT is assisting the police in its investigations.

    Earlier this month, a Thai teenage girl lost both her legs after she fell onto the tracks at the Ang Mo Kio MRT station and was hit by a train.

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    http://www.transitioning.org/2011/04...-female-voter/

    Online interview with a 26-year-old female voter

    Response of online interview with a 26-year-old Singapore voter:-

    1. Thanks for allowing us Rebecca to interview you online and please tell us a bit about yourself.



    I am a very average female Singaporean citizen aged 26 years.

    When I was 14 years old, my older friends told me that life is good. They said, “Go to Poly, get a Diploma, be employed as an executive, within a few years you can become a manager.

    The salary is good and your expenses like transport, phone and even clothes are reimbursed by the company. You can then buy a home with your sweetheart and you can look forward to having holidays twice a year.”


    When I grew up, the life that my older friends described disappeared altogether. I remember year after year, the government exhorted us to be “more productive”.

    To work harder, faster, to be leaner, to ask for less pay etc. I remember enthusiastically embracing these. Singaporeans started working until 6p.m.

    Saturdays we worked from 9a.m. to 1p.m. I thought my government will steer us back to profitability and hard times will soon be over. It did not happen.

    When I finally got a job, I had to work on Saturdays and sometimes, Sundays. I worked until 9p.m. daily to meet demanding sales targets.

    Requests to take a few days’ leave would be met with derision from my managers. I was afraid to lose my job so I worked harder.

    I met foreigners who were holidaying in Singapore. A carpenter from Denmark earns $5000 a month and was travelling around Asia for 3 months, same thing for an American builder.

    A young Norwegian engineer earns $25,000 a month and owns a house, a car and a yacht. Another Norwegian supermarket cashier works only 3 months in a year and holidays around the world for 9 months. At the peak of my career, I was earning $5200 a month.

    I did not dare take a single day of holiday for fear of being sacked. I thought I was a success, but compared to these people, I started to realize I am nothing but a laughing stock.

    Bankers like me in UK earn in excess of $20,000 a month! I started to think there is something wrong with the system in Singapore.


    Nowadays, I am jobless. I spoke to my friend, who joined PAP Youth. She says you Singaporeans are stupid and lazy. All of your problems are brought on by you. You are poor because of poor financial management.


    2. How many times have you voted before and what will you be specifically looking for during this coming election?


    Never have I gotten the chance to vote. I am looking for a party whose vision for Singapore aligns with mine. I want a more compassionate society, less rich-poor gap, more education to cope with the onslaught of globalization.

    I want experts in economics to lead us out of this mess. I want a party who will abolish this ridiculous salary of the ministers.


    Personally I feel that it is acceptable to award ministers no more than an annual wage of $400,000. If I have a pay a fortune teller like LKY millions to ‘forecast’, I fully expect to work only 1 day in a year and holiday around the world for the rest, and to own 2 houses in Sentosa Cove, 2 cars (1 Lamborghini and 1 Ferrari please) and 2 yachts on my porch.


    3. Do you think that the opposition finally has a chance to win a GRC during this election and why so or why not?

    I do not know but I sure hope the opposition wins!

    The older generation is savvy about politics but they will not vote for the opposition as they fear their vote is not secret. They say that your IC number is recorded and there is a serial number.

    For those who remember what happened, in the night, bogeyman from ISD took Opposition members away and locked them up. The citizens fear this too shall happen to them.


    For the employed, they do not care and they are too busy to care. They feel that the government is unable to do anything anyway and most will save hard to migrate when the time comes.


    For the younger generation, they are so used to seeing PAP win election after election that they just give up: “What’s the point of voting Opposition? PAP will still win in the end.”


    4. What are the pertinent issues that affect you during these past few years?

    Unemployment is the biggest issue. I remember when I was a child and my mum brought me up singlehandedly. She worked two jobs a day to support us.

    Then, jobs were plentiful and you will be comfortable as long as you are hard-working. Now, even if you are willing to work two jobs or ask for less pay, you can’t!

    Jobs for the low-skilled go to PRCs because they do not mind getting $800 a month.

    A barista in Koufu earns only $1100. For people in white-collared jobs in the offices, it is extremely common to work 12 hours to 14 hours in a day.

    When my foreign friend came to Singapore to visit me, he witnessed how crowded the trains are at 10pm.

    We could not get on the crowded trains and my friend remarked incredulously, “Singaporeans work until 10p.m?”


    The CPF minimum sum scheme affects me and my family deeply.

    Heeding the government’s call to upgrade, my mum bought a new flat at a higher price and with a new loan, preparing to downgrade and use the excess funds for her retirement when I marry and move out.

    Out of the blue, the CPF minimum sum scheme was foisted upon us all. Together with unemployment, this is a double whammy for my mum and me. We do not know what to do now.

    Our problems can be summarized thus:

    My problem: No work = no money = not qualified to take loan and no money in CPF = cannot buy flat.

    My mum’s problem: No work and No CPF = no money = cannot retire = must sell flat

    When combined, we both have no jobs and no money. Very soon, we will have no flat and no place to live too.

    SARCASTIC RANT: Thank you PAP for holding on to our hard-earned cash! You have our best interests at heart as it is true ALL the elderly WILL spend the money on PRC hookers, even our women will too!

    We definitely need you to manage our funds for us, never mind that Ho Ching lost $100 billion and can claim that she has ‘no regrets’.


    5. Do you think that Singapore will be better off with a few more opposition parties in Parliament?

    Infinitely better. With more voices, we get to learn alternatives. From alternatives, perhaps better, more innovative solutions can be forged.


    6. You have told me that you are unsure yet about which party to vote for – what will be the one crucial thing that will affect your decision during polling day?

    If any opposition party will stand up and say to Singaporeans “You should not pay me millions! You should pay me only $400,000 a year.

    The rest of the money will go to a welfare fund for the handicapped, the sick, the single mothers, the poor children and all charity shows on TV will be banned.

    No one will have to sell tissue paper in the streets anymore!”

    IF only someone would dare to say that. I think that party will win the unified support of each and every Singaporean.


    7. Do you think that the current crop of opposition party candidates are credible and qualified enough to win the votes of the general population?


    No idea. Not enough information disseminated through newspapers to know anything about opposition candidates.

    For now, it seems like Vincent from SDP and Gerald from WP are excellently eloquent speakers. Kenneth seems to be deeply unpopular. That basically summarizes all the news you can obtain from traditional media.


    8. What do you think that the opposition parties can do more to campaign effectively during this election?


    I am not sure if they are allowed to advertise on TV. Banners will be good for awareness, so that citizens are more familiar with Opposition members’ faces.

    I do not know if Opposition parties are allowed to rent halls in community centers to speak to the audience or not, but I will definitely attend such sessions.

    As more Singaporeans, including aunties, become internet-savvy, I think Opposition parties can distribute some small gifts like pens, or tissue papers or shopping bags with a namecard (stating Party name, website, facebook, Twitter, Hotline) to residents.

    Is it viable for Opposition to advertise on taxis and buses? Opposition members must give out their personal handphone numbers to the public.


    9. Why do you think that all along the opposition parties had fared poorly in the past few general elections?


    Tight control over traditional media keeps me and my family ignorant about who the opposition is and what they stand for.

    PAP keeps expounding on how difficult it is to manage a country, to formulate policies, that the opposition have no way to do it well etc. We are kept fearful and doubt the Opposition.


    10. Finally, will you vote for the Opposition?

    Yes.

    End of interview.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    437

    Default

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singa...03607-865.html

    Decomposing body found near resort world and dead china national near marina bay..both coincidentally near casinos is it e work of ah long? Guess dis is one of e big social Ill of casino

    And Also e china hawker couple who attack singaporeans .. Please what foreign talent is dis? Why r we allowing such people here much less to open stall? Singaporeans do not want to be hawkers?

    And sembawang attempted suicide? Is it due to $ not enough or?

    Are all this due to casinos and or Govt ft policy? Be ur own judge

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    437

    Default

    I just saw dis Chee soon Juan video in which he spoke in hokkien albeit abit broken but I was surprised he actually appeared pretty earnest n sincere. To quote him, but he said in hokkien , they every morning go office come back get 10k in their bank not for a year's work or a month's work but for a day's work

    I think only the top few ministers get dis much lah not all mp

    He probably went to image consultant n change his image cause he look n carry himself pretty well now unlike all e previous silly scandals

    Prob like wat ay123 said pap should also engage an image consultant n not just threaten threaten n threaten people at election with what ifs if pap do not win e election

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Csj delivers party message in hokkien

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVcXY...e_gdata_player


    If he is trying to appeal to the older generation by speaking in hokkien kinda wrong medium? Old folks do not use Internet or YouTube..

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    221

    Default

    wow.. i applaud 26 yr-old rebecca for her candidness.. what she had said strike a chord with every sgporean.. maybe except ms tin PL..

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by romeo
    wow.. i applaud 26 yr-old rebecca for her candidness.. what she had said strike a chord with every sgporean.. maybe except ms tin PL..
    But hor..... How come she is jobless at age of 26yo???

    Her examples such as yng nor engineer earning 25k a mth machiam pluck figure from thin air or simply quote the most extremme examples she noe.....

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,307

    Default

    I can aso quote examples..... Yng 28yo oil trader from middle east earning 100k+ a mth n this yr bonus of 30 mths ..... Y singka slog n earn 2.5k on average????

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    221

    Default

    huh, everyone can be jobless at any point in time mah..

    nvrmind her examples but the point she is driving at r essentially what average sgporeans r facing.. overwork, income low, inflating prices incl houses, no complete access to our retirement fund after retirement ..

    we will toll n toll and may never get to enjoy n relax comfy in sg

    the crux is where is our swiss standard of living.. think now only mps have that.. we r lucky to even have swiss cheese..

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    agree!! Many people work like hell, accumulate money in CPF for retirement and govt still want to control how we use our retirement money, how then does the average singaporean age with dignity? Not only is our CPF money under the control of govt, govt keeps advocating insurance to cover old age medical expenses, but what if the insurance cover is insufficient for major illnesses that require long-term treatment which is common to the aged? Also not many singaporeans can afford a high monthly premium for a substantial cover and many elderly with medical history are also rejected by insurance companies, so how is the government going to deal with this?

  20. #170
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Regulators
    agree!! Many people work like hell, accumulate money in CPF for retirement and govt still want to control how we use our retirement money, how then does the average singaporean age with dignity? Not only is our CPF money under the control of govt, govt keeps advocating insurance to cover old age medical expenses, but what if the insurance cover is insufficient for major illnesses that require long-term treatment which is common to the aged? Also not many singaporeans can afford a high monthly premium for a substantial cover and many elderly with medical history are also rejected by insurance companies, so how is the government going to deal with this?
    Rebecca's friend who join PAP youth is correct.
    "She says you Singaporeans are stupid and lazy. All of your problems are brought on by you. You are poor because of poor financial management."

    funny thing though, she work in the banking industry herself. Since she said she has sales target, how can she advise other people on buying financial products

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    Rebecca's friend who join PAP youth is correct.
    "She says you Singaporeans are stupid and lazy. All of your problems are brought on by you. You are poor because of poor financial management."

    funny thing though, she work in the banking industry herself. Since she said she has sales target, how can she advise other people on buying financial products
    How about Singaporeans are getting poorer due to PAP's poor financial management too ??

    I rather look at her friend's PAP elitist attitude which is Singaporeans as Them and PAP as We.

    This is common among PAP rank and file towards Singaporeans.

    PAP blame Singaporeans for everything. It is impossible as government, PAP does not have a shred of responsibility.

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wenqing
    How about Singaporeans are getting poorer due to PAP's poor financial management too ??
    Yeah..... Blame the govt!!!!
    My frens say give birth to ger better.... No nid to serve army.... Can retire 2yrs earlier

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devilplate
    But hor..... How come she is jobless at age of 26yo???

    Her examples such as yng nor engineer earning 25k a mth machiam pluck figure from thin air or simply quote the most extremme examples she noe.....
    She learnt well from PAP when quoting examples. But the example still stands.

    Singaporean quality of life must improve and match PAP's constant boast of First World standard of living.

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devilplate
    Yeah..... Blame the govt!!!!
    My frens say give birth to ger better.... No nid to serve army.... Can retire 2yrs earlier
    Up to individual preference.

    You have a government and most of your expenses are government related expenses and government policies are affecting your livelihood, you do not blame government then blame who ?

    You look down on yourself too much to blame yourself all the time.

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wenqing
    She learnt well from PAP when quoting examples. But the example still stands.

    Singaporean quality of life must improve and match PAP's constant boast of First World standard of living.
    Yeah just blame the govt!!!

  26. #176
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wenqing
    Up to individual preference.

    You have a government and most of your expenses are government related expenses and government policies are affecting your livelihood, you do not blame government then blame who ?

    You look down on yourself too much to blame yourself all the time.
    Wat toking u? Did i say i blame myself? Dun assume ok?

    Dun expect govt to babysit u like a big baby.....

    U goto find ur way out of the rat race

  27. #177
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    If she must blame somebody, blame her older friends for telling lies
    When I was 14 years old, my older friends told me that life is good. They said, “Go to Poly, get a Diploma, be employed as an executive, within a few years you can become a manager.

    Never hear such a thing during my NTU days.

    But really, if she herself is not financially wise, how can she advise people to buy bank products. Furthermore, how can she call herself a banker?? Bank teller also called banker is it?

  28. #178
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,739

    Default

    OOT. Does anybody knows what handbag that Rebecca is holding? Does it match her income level. How come people make a fuss about TPL handbag?

  29. #179
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,571

    Default

    Chiam is implying that PAP manifesto, kinda of encompassing/mirroring SPP's..., or in other words, copycat some of his party's...

    http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...123334/1/.html

    GE: Some points of PAP's manifesto mirror SPP's manifesto, says Chiam
    By Evelyn Choo | Posted: 17 April 2011 1826 hrs

    SINGAPORE : The Singapore People's Party (SPP) on Sunday said that some of the points raised in the People's Action Party's (PAP) manifesto are similar to its own.

    The comments were made after its members visited Bishan on Sunday morning.

    And appearing in force in Bishan was its newly-finalised five-member line-up set to contest the Group Representation Constituency (GRC).

    Its party campaign is slated to address a few issues, including public housing and transport, the ageing population, the foreign immigrant influx, and public accountability.

    As preparations intensify for the upcoming polls, various parties have unveiled their manifestos - including the PAP on Sunday.

    The SPP's Secretary-General, Chiam See Tong, said the six points in the PAP's manifesto mirror those of his party's.

    He added: "We will be happy to dialogue with the PAP on those points."

    Members of the party said they were encouraged that similar concerns were brought up, such as more help for the lower-income group, senior citizens, as well as the need to get Singaporeans involved in shaping their own future. But they differed in some aspects.

    Benjamin Pwee, a member of the SPP, said: "If you notice our manifesto and the key points we have raised, education is not one that we will be speaking largely into, partly because many of our other colleagues of other opposition parties will be taking it up.

    "But we do want to come from the angle of public accountability, to the entire policy formulation process, and that would definitely include policies surrounding education as well."

    Besides Bishan-Toa Payoh, the SPP has announced it would defend its Potong Pasir ward and contest the single-member constituency of Hong Kah North.

    The party has said that it will not be contesting Ang Mo Kio GRC. One of its members, Alex Tan, had expressed interest in being fielded there.

    Mr Pwee said: "Mr Alex Tan represents a younger group of Singaporeans that are passionate and want to be involved in the political scene and we are very encouraged by that. We have discussed and considered this internally and the decision is 'no' for this particular General Election.

    "As Mr Chiam has said publicly last week, we want to focus our resources and attention on Potong Pasir, on Hong Kah North, and on Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC."

    - CNA/ms

  30. #180
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,841

    Default

    If you make a lot more money than your aged parents or grandparents, does it mean your parents or grandparents are stupid and lazy as well? Different people differ in background and opportunities in life so cannot make sweeping statements like that. Some parents also sacrifice their own opportunities in life to give their children a better education and future so is it fair to call them stupid and lazy if they don't do better than their children financially? Maybe if your parents or grandparents are in that category, you call them stupid and lazy, but definitely not the majority of people here.
    Quote Originally Posted by hopeful
    Rebecca's friend who join PAP youth is correct.
    "She says you Singaporeans are stupid and lazy. All of your problems are brought on by you. You are poor because of poor financial management."

    funny thing though, she work in the banking industry herself. Since she said she has sales target, how can she advise other people on buying financial products

Similar Threads

  1. Election 2015
    By Kelonguni in forum Coffeeshop Talk
    Replies: 0
    -: 25-08-15, 15:42
  2. Replies: 0
    -: 19-01-14, 17:44
  3. Replies: 36
    -: 15-09-11, 00:16
  4. Replies: 561
    -: 02-06-11, 18:57
  5. Replies: 368
    -: 11-05-11, 08:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •