![Quote](images/SultanThemeVB4R/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Wild Falcon
The problem with all these property experts is, they lack critical thinking skills and that is why they have been consistently wrong. Their preference for 9,10,11 is or luxury is not supported by any fundamentals other than:-
1) Foreign hot speculative money is coming - seriously? Foreign hot money so keen on something with pathetic 5%-8% potential upside as predicted? No hot money will come for 5% upside - it's pathetic.
2) It has not reached previous peak (which is ridulous because there is no law of physics that says Orchard Residence should exceed previous peak of $5200psf.).
3) Suburban oversupply - 9,10,11 is only 3 small districts. There are 25 other districts over 700sqkm. So even if there are say annual supply of 10k units spread across the entire country with 25 districts, is it seriously an oversupply? Perhaps one should look at the completion per sqkm in each district to put everything on the same denominator and see which district has the greatest oversupply?
And I don't see how any district can keeping "huating" while others crash. And I really wished for the day these experts can come up with more convincing and compelling reasons other than (i) Foreign hot money will make a bigger bubble in 9,10,11 (ii) Must exceed previous peak. And looking at the TOP projects in Orchard, I don't think they will hit >$5000psf any time soon, as predicted by this JLL "Chua"expert in 2007 (why is he still being interviewed when he has no credibility?). Many of the record breaking deals are fluke in the first place - transaction was not completed.
And I really think this is not a good time to enter the market - whatever district, esp new launches. There might be value in resale though.