Freehold vs lease hold 99 after the recent news
In the past when I asked around, most told me that freehold or leasehold doesn't matter, what matters is location. Since my hubby and I are buying for own stay rather than investment, we chose to buy freehold. we own a HDB 5 room flat which we bought for only $240K, so we will use that as an investment for rental instead. 20 to 30 years later, we will sell our freehold unit and move back to our HDB. When we heard the recent news regarding developer retaining freehold land selling as leasehold, we were glad that our decision to choose freehold is right since it will become more valuable in future.
However after some thought, it may not be the case. maybe I am wrong. More leasehold property means prices will go down. we bought our FH 2 bedrm penthouse unit at high price of $953K at $983psf. If future prices of leasehold property is low, we may not be able to sell FH unit at high price becos we will always be competing with new leasehold project which is much affordable. So for future buyers, it will not be advisable to buy FH units. Those who bought freehold units in the past may stand to gain.
Yes I do need some enlightenment as I may be wrong :p
Depends on what you use it for
Whether you buy FH or LH depends on the reason for buying the home. If you are looking at it as an investment property, living off it's rental yield and flipping it later, then LH is better. Lower purchase cost.
If you are thinking in terms of giving your children an asset 25 years down the line, FH is the choice.