PDA

View Full Version : Canninghill Piers sales linked to money laundering suspect stuck in limbo as probe co



New Reporter
08-09-23, 15:41
Suspect’s seized assets in money laundering case include 10 Canninghill Piers units; those charged to be remanded further

Sep 08, 2023

THE 10 foreign nationals charged with their alleged involvement in the high-profile money laundering case – which involves assets of some S$1.8 billion now – will remain in police custody until their next court dates, amid ongoing investigations.

In court on Wednesday (Sep 6), the prosecution brought up affidavits filed by investigating officers, which said the accused should not be granted bail as the offences committed were serious.

There was also a risk of collusion among the accused and witnesses – these include family members of the accused and other persons who are currently overseas.

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Foo Shi Hao said one of the persons on the run – referred to as Subject Y – was a cousin of an accused, Chinese national Wang Baosen. More than S$100 million belonging to Subject Y has been frozen.

DPP Foo argued that granting the accused bail would raise a risk of collusion and witness tampering.

Wang Baosen’s counsel, Adrian Wee of Lighthouse Law, argued for him to be out on bail. He said his client was specifically handed two charges involving assets or cash worth S$396,000, which, although serious, “does not cross the threshold to deny (the accused) bail”.

He also said his client was not a flight risk, as his two passports were seized by the police and his assets of S$18 million have been frozen.

DPP Foo refuted these statements, pointing out that S$396,000 was not a small amount, and that the offences would result in a “serious custodial sentence”.

In the case of Cypriot national Su Haijin, who was injured while allegedly evading arrest, DPP Ng Jean Ting asked for him to be remanded for eight days as the police had been unable to take statements from him for six to seven days.

He was also slapped with a money laundering charge, which referenced about S$4 million in a UOB bank account gained through unlawful remote gambling.

District Judge Brenda Tan granted the prosecution’s remand request, to make up for “lost time”. She also ordered for him to be moved to Changi Medical Centre upon discharge. He will return to court on Sep 13.

DPP Ng noted that Su Haijin and another accused, Cambodian national Su Baolin, possibly have “close financial dealings” as they acquired assets together.

These assets include two properties on Beach Road in Su Haijin’s name, worth S$2.2 million, as well as a yacht bought by both accused and two individuals, and registered to a fifth.

The three other unnamed individuals left Singapore just before or soon after investigations began, said DPP Ng.

These were revealed during the investigating officers’ separate investigations, as Su Baolin was “reticent” with providing information, said the prosecutor. Su Baolin claimed through a Mandarin interpreter that he had been cooperative.

Su Baolin’s lawyer, Sunil Sudheesan of Quahe Woo & Palmer, argued that the possibility of collusion between Su Haijin and Su Baolin was overstated by the prosecution.

He added that Su Baolin was not a flight risk, as his immediate family had settled in Singapore.

Another person named in Su Baolin’s case was Wang Qiming, who is purported to be an ex-employee of Citibank. Su Baolin and Wang Qiming had allegedly worked together to forge a document to cheat Standard Chartered Bank.

Wang Qiming has been under investigation since 2021, noted Sudheesan, but no charges have been levied against him.

DPP Ng countered that the evidence of Wang Qiming and Su Baolin’s conspiracy related to this case was only recently revealed.

A Citi spokesperson said the individual has not been employed by the bank since April 2022. “We do not comment on matters that are before the courts,” the spokesperson added.

District Judge Tan denied bail to both Wang Baosen and Su Baolin, as she was satisfied there was a “real and high flight risk” in both cases, due to both accused having the means to abscond. Both will return to court on Oct 4.

Turkish national Vang Shuiming is scheduled to return to court on Sep 14, after his High Court bid to be released on bail on Tuesday was dismissed.

On Tuesday, it was found that he had around S$128.2 million parked with four financial institutions – Julius Baer, Credit Suisse, RHB and UOB Kay Hian. The sum has since been seized.

He also had assets worth about S$200 million in Singapore, including four properties and three vehicles valued at around S$29 million collectively, S$962,000 in cash and 11 units in condominiums still under construction.

These condominium units refer to 10 at Canninghill Piers in Clarke Quay and one at Park Nova on Tomlinson Road.

Meanwhile, the remaining six accused will return to court on Oct 18 for bail review.

Some lawyers made requests to allow the family members of the accused to visit or make phone calls. They were directed to write to the prosecution.

One accused, Chinese national Zhang Ruijin, requested to see a psychiatrist, as he told the court he had anxiety and could only sleep one to two hours each night.

“I feel pain all over my body,” he said in Mandarin.

His counsel, Loo Choon Chiaw of Loo & Partners, said Zhang has clinical depression.

District Judge Tan said he could seek medical help from the prison doctor, and further aid would be provided if needed.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/banking-finance/suspects-seized-assets-money-laundering-case-include-10

New Reporter
08-09-23, 15:45
Canninghill Piers sales linked to money laundering suspect stuck in limbo as probe continues

Status of uncompleted transactions and payments is in doubt, with properties frozen by court order

Sep 08, 2023

Updated Sep 11, 2023

INVESTIGATIONS into a wide-reaching money laundering syndicate have thrown partially paid transactions for 10 Canninghill Piers luxury properties into a state of limbo, including payments collected by developers so far.

With the police probe uncovering new information by the day, more uncompleted properties may soon be caught in the web. The value of seized assets has gone up from an initial S$1 billion reported on Aug 16 to S$1.8 billion on Sep 5.

One of the 10 suspects caught in the massive police dragnet, Vang Shuiming, has been verified in court documents to have financed the purchase of 10 residential units at Canninghill Piers. The project is a luxury integrated development coming up on the former Liang Court site in River Valley. The 10 properties identified in court have been issued with prohibition-of-disposal orders by the police.

One issue arising is whether the developers, City Developments (CDL) and CapitaLand Development, will be able to keep part of the sizeable funds collected so far in payment for these units. As the project is still under construction, payments would have been made according to a standard progressive-payment schedule.

It is also unclear if the developers will be able to recover the units now frozen by court order to eventually resell them.

“After payment is made to a developer pursuant to a sale-and-purchase agreement, the money belongs to the developer. Therefore, consideration must be from the perspective of the developer, and, given the circumstances of each case, how much knowledge the developer had surrounding the proceeds they have received,” said Denise Teo, director of disputes resolution practice group at Yuen Law.

“The procedure is such that once property (in this case, the payments for the property) is seized (or simply frozen by a prohibition order, if not physically taken), it is likely to remain seized until the conclusion of the criminal case, when the court will make an order on how the property is to be dealt with,” she added.

When a confiscation order is made by the court, the bank or developer must hand over monies collected to the authorities, Teo said.

In response to queries from The Business Times (BT), CDL and CapitaLand Development said they were unable to comment as investigations are ongoing.

According to the standard payment schedule for uncompleted properties, an initial 20 per cent would have been paid upfront when the sale-and-purchase agreement was signed.

The balance is paid progressively, in line with stages of construction of the project. The final payments, totalling 40 per cent of the purchase price, are made when the development receives its temporary occupation permit (TOP) and certificate of statutory completion.

In the case of the 10 Canninghill Piers units now confirmed to be under probe, Vang would have paid possibly 30 per cent to 40 per cent of the purchase price for these units since the purchase, with a significant balance yet to be collected by the developers.

Canninghill Piers was launched for sale in November 2021. Prices ranged from S$1.16 million for a one-bedroom unit to over S$8 million for five-bedroom units, to S$50 million for a penthouse. Based on estimates, the 10 units linked to Vang, who was arrested on Aug 15, could have cost a total sum of between S$30 million and S$50 million.

Vang is also named in connection with an uncompleted property in Park Nova, a high-end freehold project on Tomlinson Road being built by Hong Kong developer Shun Tak. Launched in May 2021, Park Nova apartments were sold at between S$6.8 million and S$34.4 million during the month, according to BT’s checks on caveats data.

Under the Housing Developers Rules, a developer can treat the sale-and-purchase agreement as repudiated by the purchaser if any part of payment is unpaid for more than 14 days after it is due.

The developer is then entitled to annul the agreement. It has the right to resell the property and keep 20 per cent of the amount paid, refunding the balance to the purchaser.

With police investigations ongoing, these contract terms are now in doubt and any outcome will depend on court orders, said Tris Xavier, associate director of integrated property practice group at Yuen Law.

New guidelines for developers to combat money laundering and terrorism financing in the Singapore property market kicked in on Jun 28, 2023. The guidelines, issued by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), require developers to conduct checks on prospective buyers. They also spell out high-risk scenarios – such as unusually large transactions – that should be flagged to the authorities.

URA’s guidelines further require ongoing monitoring of transactions. “Developers must, before issuing the notice of payment for TOP and for completion of sale, review the adequacy of the information and documents obtained” as a result of customer due diligence checks, to take into account new information on the buyer, their income, risk profile and source of funds.

BT understands that since the new guidelines took effect on Jun 28, the Canninghill Piers transactions now under investigation may not have been subject to requirements.

Previous media reports have said that a single buyer from Fujian, China, had purchased 20 units at Canninghill Piers for more than S$85 million.

It is believed that the current prohibition orders cover 10 of those units.

According to previous reports, the 20 apartments sold to a single buyer included 10 three-room units priced between S$3.1 million and S$3.3 million; the rest were four-room units priced between S$5.3 million and S$5.6 million.

Latest caveats data as at Sep 8 shows that 680 units – or 98 per cent of the project – have been sold. The most recent sales lodged for Canninghill Piers over the last three months were for two five-room units transacted at about S$8.6 million each.

Over the 99-year leasehold project’s launch weekend in November 2021, 538 units were sold at an average price of around S$3,000 per square foot.

Joint developers CDL and CapitaLand Development chalked up total sales of S$1.18 billion over that weekend, and moved 77 per cent of the project’s 696 units.

The project is expected to be completed in 2025.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/property/canninghill-piers-sales-linked-money-laundering-suspect-stuck-limbo-probe-continues