PDA

View Full Version : Now low interest rate, next negative interest, later TOTAL CASHLESS



indomie
30-10-15, 10:48
People in Sweden are hiding cash in their microwaves because of a fascinating — and terrifying — economic experiment

Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | Email

Business Insider
Thursday, Oct. 29, 2015


Björn Eriksson, former head of Sweden’s national police and now head of Säkerhetsbranschen, a lobbying group for the security industry, told The Local, “I’ve heard of people keeping cash in their microwaves because banks won’t accept it.” Fotolia

Sweden is shaping up to be the first country to plunge its citizens into a fascinating — and terrifying — economic experiment: negative interest rates in a cashless society.


The Swedish central bank held its benchmark interest rate at -0.35% today, the level it has been at since July.

Although retail banks have yet to pass on that negative to rate to Swedish consumers, the longer it’s held there the more financial pressure there is for banks to pass the costs onto their customers. That’s a problem because Sweden is the closest country on the planet to becoming an all-electronic cashless society.

Remember, Sweden is the place where, if you use too much cash, banks call the police because they think you might be a terrorist or a criminal. Swedish banks have started removing cash ATM machines from rural areas, annoying old people and farmers. Credit Suisse says the rule of thumb in Scandinavia is: “If you have to pay in cash, something is wrong.”

Here’s a chart from Quartz demonstrating how serious the Swedes are about getting rid of cash:

Quartz

If banks charge customers negative rates of interest in a cashless society, those customers are not able to withdraw their money as cash to shield it, under their putative mattresses. Consumers’ only choice in such a scenario is to spend it or let the bank take it. (The theory is that by forcing people to spend cash rather than save it, you can spur economic growth.)

Rather than going further into negative territory — a move that carries political risks the more negative it becomes — the Riksbank chose instead to do another round of quantitative easing (a forced bond buying program that flushes more central bank cash into the economy).

But the pressure for negative interest rates to drive cash out of bank deposits and into the economy is building. Switzerland, for instance, has negative central policy rates that cost its banks $1 billion a year. Those costs haven’t yet been passed down to consumers. But how much longer will banks eat that before adding fees and charges to Swiss accounts to defray the cost?

We reported at the weekend how central bankers and investment bank analysts are increasingly discussing when this might happen. And yesterday, Italy sold a two-year bond at an interest rate of -0.023%, which means investors have to pay to lend Italy money rather than receive interest on their loans. (Why would you buy such a bond? Well, if you believe that you’ll get even worse terms in the future from other creditors — hello, Sweden! — then suddenly -0.023% starts to look pretty good.)

So two trends are converging on Sweden at the same time:

Sweden is using less and less cash.
Sweden is a negative interest rate environment.
And that means many Swedes have no way to “hide” their money.

So Sweden may become the first country where its citizens may have to accept negative interest rates (probably in the form of higher bank charges or fees) or be forced to spend their money in order to “save” it from those rates.

A resistance is forming, and some people are protesting the impending extinction of cash. Björn Eriksson, former head of Sweden’s national police and now head of Säkerhetsbranschen, a lobbying group for the security industry, told The Local, “I’ve heard of people keeping cash in their microwaves because banks won’t accept it.”

Kelonguni
30-10-15, 11:09
Today I asked Google a question - who does US owe their 18 trillions to? The results were fascinating and mind-boggling.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/12/chart-who-does-the-u-s-govt-owe-17-trillion-to/

http://people.howstuffworks.com/5-united-states-debt-holders.htm

And then, I came across this National Debt Clock updated as of yesterday.

http://www.davemanuel.com/us-national-debt-clock.php

Kelonguni
30-10-15, 11:24
And then I asked if we have a Singapore debt clock.

Yes we do, just that we do not borrow externally.

http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/singapore

Arcachon
30-10-15, 13:53
And then I asked if we have a Singapore debt clock.

Yes we do, just that we do not borrow externally.

http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/singapore

We will soon have to join them.

If I tell you I borrow money to become rich and you work to become poor, what will you do.

What the US can do, others can do better. Just look at South China Sea.

China made Island, US send Warship.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/30/us-and-china-agree-to-cooperate-despite-tensions-over-south-china-sea

Kelonguni
30-10-15, 14:50
If we borrow internally enough why need to borrow externally? It's not as if we can upgrade so many infrastructures internally.

SG no way to borrow and become rich - it's too unstable for a small country like us. Why we prosper I feel is because a huge majority of us spend the majority of our fruitful working years here, and we attract other talents (and non-talents) to contribute their skills and useful years here.

SG can never afford the patterns of the huge countries, and I am happy for that sustainability.


We will soon have to join them.

If I tell you I borrow money to become rich and you work to become poor, what will you do.

What the US can do, others can do better. Just look at South China Sea.

China made Island, US send Warship.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/30/us-and-china-agree-to-cooperate-despite-tensions-over-south-china-sea

Citizen
18-11-15, 07:33
Now many European countries and USA need to increase their security spending budget. Dun know whether they will squeeze their own people ( increase taxation ) or choose easy way ( create money from the thin air) sighs

Kelonguni
18-11-15, 09:13
Now many European countries and USA need to increase their security spending budget. Dun know whether they will squeeze their own people ( increase taxation ) or choose easy way ( create money from the thin air) sighs

Increased employment for the security departments? I like the idea!

But also there is an impact on confidence in the economy as well as spending.

When economy and spending goes down globally what are the likely consequences?