PDA

View Full Version : The Dawn of the Super-Empowered Singaporean - An Open Letter to the People of Singapo



minority
12-06-14, 17:17
The Dawn of the Super-Empowered Singaporean - An Open Letter to the People of Singapore (and Catherine Lim too)
June 10, 2014 at 4:42pm
June 7th, 2014The Dawn of the Super-Empowered Singaporean - An Open Letter to the People of Singapore (and Catherine Lim too)

I had thought to keep quiet during this period of Singapore's transition. But what is happening has perturbed me as an ordinary Singaporean. Indeed it should perturb Singaporeans of all political stripes and ideological colours. Free speech and dignity is under threat.

Dear all (including Catherine Lim),I agree with you that there is a crisis of trust. Many people no longer trust the institutions of society, whether it is the government, the civil service and the judiciary. It's a problem for other public sector servants too: our teachers, nurses, doctors and policemen.

How did we come to this sad situation? Is it because of politicians suing each other for libel? PAP politicians' legal actions are well known: JB Jeyaretnam and Tang Liang Hong and so on. Even Mr Chiam See Tong in the 1980s sued Minister S. Dhanabalan [1] for what was said at an election rally. Dhanabalan made a public apology and settled out of court.Or is it something deeper than lawsuits?Is there now a climate of poison and hate in public discourse? Extreme partisans on different sides painting each other as unwilling to listen or incapable of caring.

We must debate and discuss where our country is going, especially with all the big changes happening around us: America, China and Japan jostling for influence in Asia. Russia invading Ukraine and changing the tone for how small countries face off with big powers. Indonesia and Malaysia in transition.

But how we debate issues matters too because that sets the tone for our democracy.I don't want Singapore to become a false democracy of demonisation where hate is whipped up because it makes for good online viewership and better advertising revenue.Today people are talking past each other, not with each other. Truth and facts become a casualty when what matters is perception and public relations rather than finding out what really happened.

Fiction in literature wins prizes and awards. A writer with flair and imagination can take us beyond the bounds of reality, to worlds that live only in fantasy.Critical debate is part and parcel of democracy. A well written critique opens the mind to new angles and builds public awareness of important issues. It can shape discourse among the intelligentsia including the civil service.But writing outright lies about other people, as some commentators have done, is a different matter.Would Catherine Lim be as sanguine if somebody accused her of wanton plagiarism in her writing? Or of embezzling money from her publisher? Would she be as conciliatory were her own author's integrity under public attack?Perhaps such things do not matter to Catherine Lim. But they matter to every public servant doing their duty, every hardworking Singaporean earning an honest living.We may not earn big salaries but each of us is born with dignity and the right to a rightful reputation.Should a nurse be told to keep quiet in the name of "freedom of expression and open debate", if a member of the public makes a false allegation that she was stealing morphine from the hospital pharmacy? Or would we support her in defending her reputation, even if it means going to court, even if the false accuser is a well-connected famous blogger with rich supporters?

The problem is not that PM Lee is taking blogger Roy Ngerng to court over a false allegation. If anything, we need the authorities to support more public servants in defending their reputations against unjust, false accusations.Otherwise the day will come when every one of us has to kowtow to super-empowered individuals who can destroy a worker's reputation at a stroke of a pen or the click of a mouse.

[1] Online article on S. Dhanabalanhttp://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_1727_2011-09-26.html
The letter was circulating in the email.

meow123
12-06-14, 18:19
plainly nonsense.


if you are so unhappy about the state of singapore,

do consider migrating.


if you can't, you can take a leaf from roy, the nurse-boy in CDC, make an ass of yourself, then seek asylum.


in summary, just take action, instead of living in your own pocket of illusion.

Arcachon
12-06-14, 18:22
http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_1727_2011-09-26.html

https://www.facebook.com/notes/fabrications-about-the-pap/the-dawn-of-the-super-empowered-singaporean-an-open-letter-to-the-people-of-sing/674692532586758

riverfish
13-06-14, 13:59
Europe has chosen the model of high personal taxes & high public spending on cradle-to-grave public welfare system.Certain Nordic countries can sustain this model because they have rich natural resources. Others incur budget deficit year after year, squandering the wealth of the future generations who will have to confront reality & pay for it one day.

Pros - greatly mitigates income inequality and results in more equal society, reduces social tension btw the haves & have-nots. Cons:- disincentive to slog hard. You can see individuals choosing to stay unemployed whilst claiming state benefits.

The billion-dollar question is whether such European model is sustainable in the long term. Can individual European countries stay competitive with such model with the rise of Asia? I have my doubts.

Singapore has chosen the pure capitalism low personal & corporate taxes model, to stay competitive. This model inevitably results in sharp division btw the successful & rich v the poor & unsuccessful ones, giving rise to social tension btw these groups with opposing interests. Singapore govt tries to mitigate this sharp income inequality by using taxes to pay for subsidies, workfare scheme, rebates etc for the poor. But given the global trend where the rich possessing information, knowledge, land & hard assets, will only get richer, whilst the poor stuck in low-value added jobs (increasingly being replaced by ever more sophisticated & human-like A.I robots) will only get poorer - Spore govt's aid for the poor will do little to eliminate the increasingly sharp conflict of interests btw the haves & have-nots in Singapore.

This is amply reflected in the CPF saga, the stand-off btw Roy supporters, versus those supporting govt's CPF policies. Relenting to the demands of these Roy supporters will do little to improve their lot. After the initial euphoria (of having won the battle with PAP) dies away, these have-nots will find that economically, they are no better off or their lives in fact end up worse off. Inflation, the inability to climb up the value-add & wage ladder will condemn them to a life of poverty. The little CPF monies (which they are allowed to withdrawal in full at 55 - having gloriously won the CPF Roy battle) they have on hand will melt away like sand as inflation bites, & the financial illiteracy plaguing many in this group will only make matters worse.